Mass predictions based on a supersymmetric SU(5) fixed point

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 68, Issue 1, 2003, Pages

  Ferrandis, Javier ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ELEMENTARY PARTICLE; MASS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PHYSICS;

EID: 0041885515     PISSN: 15507998     EISSN: 15502368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.68.015001     Document Type: Article

References (136)

1. Particle Data Group, D. E. Groom, Eur. Phys. J. C 15, 1 (2000).
2. H. Georgi and S. L. Glashow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 438 (1974).
3. Supersymmetric extensions of the standard model provide a natural solution to the gauge hierarchy problem 4 and predict correctly the weak mixing angle, i.e. they incorporate the unification of gauge couplings.
4. M. J. Veltman, Acta Phys. Pol. B 12, 437 (1981);
5. R. K. Kaul, Phys. Lett. 109B, 19 (1982).
6. M. B. Einhorn and D. R. Jones, Nucl. Phys. B196, 475 (1982);
7. Nucl. Phys.J. R. Ellis, D. V. Nanopoulos, and S. Rudaz, B202, 43 (1982);
8. B. Ananthanarayan, G. Lazarides, and Q. Shafi, Phys. Rev. D 44, 1613 (1991);
9. Phys. Rev. DH. Arason, D. J. Castano, B. Keszthelyi, S. Mikaelian, E. J. Piard, P. Ramond, and B. D. Wright, 46, 3945 (1992);
10. Phys. Rev. DV. D. Barger, M. S. Berger, and P. Ohmann, 47, 1093 (1993);
11. Phys. Rev. DP. Langacker and N. Polonsky, 49, 1454 (1994);
12. M. Carena, M. Olechowski, S. Pokorski, and C. E. Wagner, Nucl. Phys. B426, 269 (1994);
13. H. Baer, M. A. Diaz, J. Ferrandis, and X. Tata, Phys. Rev. D 61, 111701(R) (2000);
14. H. Baer and J. Ferrandis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 211803 (2001);
15. Phys. Rev. Lett.T. Blazek, R. Dermisek, and S. Raby, 88, 111804 (2002);
16. T. BlazekR. DermisekS. RabyPhys. Rev. D 65, 115004 (2002).
17. The more complicated problem of the first- and second-generation fermion masses and mixing angles has also been addressed. Several Yukawa textures, in the context of different unified groups, have been studied in the literature. In these extended versions of the theory the high energy couplings must also be adjusted simultaneously to fit the low-energy data. In doing so one can ascertain the dominant operator contributions at the unification scale. See for instance: S. Raby, Introduction to Theories of Fermion Masses, 1994 Summer School in High Energy Physics and Cosmology (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995);
18. S. Raby“Testing theories of fermion masses,” talk at SUSY2001, Dubna, Russia, 2001, hep-ph/0110203, and references therein.
19. B. Pendleton and G. G. Ross, Phys. Lett. 98B, 291 (1981).
20. J. Bagger, S. Dimopoulos, and E. Masso, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1450 (1985);
21. Phys. Rev. Lett.J. BaggerS. DimopoulosE. Masso55, 920 (1985);
22. J. BaggerS. DimopoulosE. MassoPhys. Lett. 156B, 357 (1985);
23. J. BaggerS. DimopoulosE. MassoNucl. Phys. B253, 397 (1985).
24. M. Lanzagorta and G. G. Ross, Phys. Lett. B 349, 319 (1995).
25. I. Masina, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 16, 5101 (2001), see chapter (3) and references therein.
26. E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B188, 513 (1981).
27. N. Sakai, Z. Phys. C 11, 153 (1981).
28. S. Dimopoulos and H. Georgi, Nucl. Phys. B193, 150 (1981).
29. N. Polonsky and A. Pomarol, Phys. Rev. D 51, 6532 (1995);
30. N. PolonskyA. PomarolPhys. Rev. Lett. 73, 2292 (1994).
31. R. Barbieri, L. J. Hall, and A. Strumia, Nucl. Phys. B445, 219 (1995);
32. Nucl. Phys.P. Ciafaloni, A. Romanino, and A. Strumia, B458, 3 (1996).
33. J. Bagger, J. L. Feng, and N. Polonsky, Nucl. Phys. B563, 3 (1999).
34. B. C. Allanach and S. F. King, Phys. Lett. B 407, 124 (1997).
35. P. Langacker, Phys. Rep. 72, 185 (1981);
36. S. Dimopoulos, S. Raby, and F. Wilczek, Phys. Lett. 112B, 133 (1982);
37. R. Arnowitt and P. Nath, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 725 (1992);
38. P. Nath and R. Arnowitt, Phys. Lett. B 287, 89 (1992);
39. J. Hisano, H. Murayama, and T. Yanagida, Nucl. Phys. B402, 46 (1993);
40. R. Dermisek, A. Mafi, and S. Raby, Phys. Rev. D 63, 035001 (2001);
41. Phys. Rev. DH. Murayama and A. Pierce, 65, 055009 (2002);
42. Phys. Rev. DB. Bajc, P. F. Perez, and G. Senjanovic, 66, 075005 (2002).
43. H. Arason, D. J. Castano, B. Keszthelyi, S. Mikaelian, E. J. Piard, P. Ramond, and B. D. Wright, Phys. Rev. D 46, 3945 (1992).
44. B. D. Wright, “Yukawa coupling thresholds: Application to the MSSM and the minimal supersymmetric SU(5) GUT,” hep-ph/9404217.
45. H. Baer, J. Ferrandis, K. Melnikov, and X. Tata, Phys. Rev. D 66, 074007 (2002).
46. I. Antoniadis, C. Kounnas, and K. Tamvakis, Phys. Lett. 119B, 377 (1982).
47. R. Tarrach, Nucl. Phys. B183, 384 (1981).
48. L. V. Avdeev and M. Y. Kalmykov, Nucl. Phys. B502, 419 (1997).
49. K. Melnikov and T. v. Ritbergen, Phys. Lett. B 482, 99 (2000);
50. K. G. Chetyrkin and M. Steinhauser, Nucl. Phys. B573, 617 (2000);
51. K. G. Chetyrkin, J. H. Kuhn, and M. Steinhauser, Comput. Phys. Commun. 133, 43 (2000).
52. I. Jack, D. R. Jones, S. P. Martin, M. T. Vaughn, and Y. Yamada, Phys. Rev. D 50, 5481 (1994);
53. I. Jack and D. R. Jones, Phys. Lett. B 333, 372 (1994);
54. Y. Yamada, Phys. Rev. D 50, 3537 (1994);
55. Phys. Rev. DS. P. Martin and M. T. Vaughn, 50, 2282 (1994);
56. Phys. Rev. DV. D. Barger, M. S. Berger, and P. Ohmann, 47, 1093 (1993).
57. We use two-loop RGEs for the MSSM couplings as implemented in ISASUGRA. For additional information you can visit ISAJET homepage at http://www.bnl.gov/isajet. ISAJET manual is available in the arXiv.org eprint archive, see H. Baer, F. E. Paige, S. D. Protopopescu, and X. Tata, “ISAJET 7.48: A Monte Carlo event generator for p p, anti-p p, and e+e-reactions,” hep-ph/0001086.
58. D. M. Pierce, J. A. Bagger, K. T. Matchev, and R. j. Zhang, Nucl. Phys. B491, 3 (1997).
59. K. Inoue, A. Kakuto, H. Komatsu, and S. Takeshita, Prog. Theor. Phys. 67, 1889 (1982);
60. L. E. Ibanez and C. Lopez, Nucl. Phys. B233, 511 (1984).
61. R. Hempfling, Z. Phys. C 63, 309 (1994);
62. L. J. Hall, R. Rattazzi, and U. Sarid, Phys. Rev. D 50, 7048 (1994);
63. M. Carena, M. Olechowski, S. Pokorski, and C. E. Wagner, Nucl. Phys. B426, 269 (1994);
64. T. Blazek, S. Raby, and S. Pokorski, Phys. Rev. D 52, 4151 (1995).
65. L. Girardello and M. T. Grisaru, Nucl. Phys. B194, 65 (1982).
66. L. F. Li, Phys. Rev. D 9, 1723 (1974);
67. A. J. Buras, J. R. Ellis, M. K. Gaillard, and D. V. Nanopoulos, Nucl. Phys. B135, 66 (1978);
68. M. Magg and Q. Shafi, Z. Phys. C 4, 63 (1980);
69. F. Buccella, H. Ruegg, and C. A. Savoy, Nucl. Phys. B169, 68 (1980).
70. N. V. Dragon, Phys. Lett. 113B, 288 (1982);
71. N. Dragon, Z. Phys. C 15, 169 (1982);
72. F. Buccella, J. P. Derendinger, S. Ferrara, and C. A. Savoy, Phys. Lett. 115B, 375 (1982).
73. I. Jack and D. R. Jones, Phys. Lett. B 443, 177 (1998).
74. It has also been pointed out by I. Jack and D. R. T. Jones that, under certain conditions for the dimensionless couplings, there are RG-invariant universal forms for the soft paramaters, and that these may also constitute an IR fixed point that may be approached closely at the unification scale. I. Jack, D. R. Jones, and K. L. Roberts, Nucl. Phys. B455, 83 (1995);
75. P. M. Ferreira, I. Jack, and D. R. Jones, Phys. Lett. B 357, 359 (1995).
76. M. Lanzagorta and G. G. Ross, Phys. Lett. B 364, 163 (1995).
77. G. Amelino-Camelia, “Simple GUTs,” talk given at 9th International Seminar on High-energy Physics: Quarks 96, Yaroslavl, Russia, 1996, hep-ph/9610298.
78. There have been previous attempts to understand the SU(5) spontaneous symmetry-breaking pattern as a possible result of the renormalization group flow. B. C. Allanach, G. Amelino-Camelia, O. Philipsen, O. Pisanti, and L. Rosa, Nucl. Phys. B537, 32 (1999);
79. B. C. Allanach, G. Amelino-Camelia, and O. Philipsen, Phys. Lett. B 393, 349 (1997).
80. J. E. Kim and H. P. Nilles, Phys. Lett. 138B, 150 (1984).
81. R. Arnowitt and P. Nath, Phys. Rev. D 46, 3981 (1992).
82. Y. Okada, M. Yamaguchi, and T. Yanagida, Prog. Theor. Phys. 85, 1 (1991);
83. H. E. Haber and R. Hempfling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1815 (1991);
84. J. R. Ellis, G. Ridolfi, and F. Zwirner, Phys. Lett. B 257, 83 (1991);
85. Phys. Lett. BJ. R. EllisG. RidolfiF. Zwirner262, 477 (1991);
86. Phys. Lett. BA. Brignole, J. R. Ellis, G. Ridolfi, and F. Zwirner, 271, 123 (1991).
87. P. Langacker and N. Polonsky, Phys. Rev. D 47, 4028 (1993);
88. M. Carena, S. Pokorski, and C. E. Wagner, Nucl. Phys. B406, 59 (1993);
89. P. Langacker and N. Polonsky, Phys. Rev. D 52, 3081 (1995).
90. S. Dimopoulos, S. Raby, and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. D 24, 1681 (1981);
91. U. Amaldi, W. de Boer, and H. Furstenau, Phys. Lett. B 260, 447 (1991);
92. Phys. Lett. BJ. R. Ellis, S. Kelley, and D. V. Nanopoulos, 260, 131 (1991);
93. P. Langacker and M. X. Luo, Phys. Rev. D 44, 817 (1991).
94. J. R. Ellis, K. Enqvist, D. V. Nanopoulos, and F. Zwirner, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 1, 57 (1986).
95. R. Barbieri and G. F. Giudice, Nucl. Phys. B306, 63 (1988).
96. G. W. Anderson and D. J. Castano, Phys. Lett. B 347, 300 (1995);
97. G. W. AndersonD. J. CastanoPhys. Rev. D 52, 1693 (1995);
98. Phys. Rev. DG. W. AndersonD. J. Castano53, 2403 (1996).
99. K. L. Chan, U. Chattopadhyay, and P. Nath, Phys. Rev. D 58, 096004 (1998).
100. R. Barbieri and A. Strumia, Phys. Lett. B 433, 63 (1998);
101. L. Giusti, A. Romanino, and A. Strumia, Nucl. Phys. B550, 3 (1999);
102. A. Strumia, “Naturalness of supersymmetric models,” hep-ph/9904247;
103. A. Romanino and A. Strumia, Phys. Lett. B 487, 165 (2000);
104. R. Barbieri and A. Strumia, “The ‘LEP paradox’,” hep-ph/0007265;
105. R. BarbieriA. StrumiaPhys. Lett. B 490, 247 (2000).
106. B. de Carlos and J. A. Casas, Phys. Lett. B 309, 320 (1993).
107. G. G. Ross and R. G. Roberts, Nucl. Phys. B377, 571 (1992);
108. Nucl. Phys.P. H. Chankowski, J. R. Ellis, M. Olechowski, and S. Pokorski, B544, 39 (1999);
109. P. H. Chankowski, J. R. Ellis, and S. Pokorski, Phys. Lett. B 423, 327 (1998);
110. Phys. Lett. BG. L. Kane and S. F. King, 451, 113 (1999).
111. J. L. Feng, K. T. Matchev, and T. Moroi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2322 (2000);
112. J. L. Feng and K. T. Matchev, Phys. Rev. D 63, 095003 (2001);
113. S. Dimopoulos and G. F. Giudice, Phys. Lett. B 357, 573 (1995).
114. M. Carena, M. Olechowski, S. Pokorski, and C. E. Wagner, Nucl. Phys. B419, 213 (1994).
115. B. C. Allanach, J. P. Hetherington, M. A. Parker, and B. R. Webber, J. High Energy Phys. 08, 017 (2000);
116. U. Chattopadhyay, A. Datta, A. Datta, A. Datta, and D. P. Roy, Phys. Lett. B 493, 127 (2000);
117. J. L. Feng, K. T. Matchev, and T. Moroi, Phys. Rev. D 61, 075005 (2000).
118. P. H. Chankowski, Z. Pluciennik, and S. Pokorski, Nucl. Phys. B439, 23 (1995);
119. Nucl. Phys.R. Barbieri, P. Ciafaloni, and A. Strumia, B442, 461 (1995).
120. S. P. Martin, Phys. Rev. D 66, 096001 (2002).
121. J. Bagger, K. T. Matchev, and D. Pierce, Phys. Lett. B 348, 443 (1995);
122. Y. Yamada, Z. Phys. C 60, 83 (1993).
123. J. Hisano, H. Murayama, and T. Yanagida, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1014 (1992);
124. Phys. Rev. Lett.K. Hagiwara and Y. Yamada, 70, 709 (1993);
125. M. B. Einhorn and D. R. Jones, Nucl. Phys. B196, 475 (1982).
126. B. Schrempp, Phys. Lett. B 344, 193 (1995).
127. V. D. Barger, M. S. Berger, P. Ohmann, and R. J. Phillips, Phys. Lett. B 314, 351 (1993);
128. Phys. Lett. BW. A. Bardeen, M. Carena, S. Pokorski, and C. E. Wagner, 320, 110 (1994);
129. M. Carena and C. E. Wagner, hep-ph/9407208;
130. M. CarenaC. E. WagnerNucl. Phys. B452, 45 (1995);
131. B. Brahmachari, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 12, 1969 (1997);
132. S. A. Abel and B. Allanach, Phys. Lett. B 415, 371 (1997);
133. J. A. Casas, J. R. Espinosa, and H. E. Haber, Nucl. Phys. B526, 3 (1998);
134. G. K. Yeghian, M. Jurcisin, and D. I. Kazakov, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 14, 601 (1999).
135. S. P. Martin, Phys. Rev. D 65, 035003 (2002).
136. For convenience a few typical SU(5) representations and their Dynkin indices are listed here: (Formula presented) and (Formula presented)