Relating bottom quark mass in DR̄ and MS̄ regularization schemes

Physical Review D

Volumn 66, Issue 7, 2002, Pages

  Baer, Howard ^a   Ferrandis, Javier ^b   Melnikov, Kirill ^c   Tata, Xerxes ^b  

^a Florida State University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^c SLAC NATIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ELEMENTARY PARTICLE; MASS COMMUNICATION; MODEL; NUCLEAR PHYSICS;

EID: 4243801773     PISSN: 05562821     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.66.074007     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. For recent reviews, see e.g., S. Martin, in Perspectives on Supersymmetry, edited by G. Kane (World Scientific, Singapore, 1998), hep-ph/9709356;
2. M. Drees, hep-ph/9611409;
3. J. Bagger, hep-ph/9604232;
4. X. Tata, in Proc. IX J. Swieca Summer School, edited by J. Barata, A. Malbousson, and S. Novaes, hep-ph/9706307;
5. S. Dawson, in Proc. TASI 97, edited by J. Bagger, hep-ph/9712464.
6. Some examples include D. Pierce et al., Nucl. Phys. B491, 3 (1997);
7. E-Proc. RADCOR 2000, edited by H. Haber, http://www.slac.stanford.edu/ econf/C000911/;
8. Radiative Corrections: Application of Quantum Field Theory to Phenomenology, Proc. RADCOR 98, edited by J. Sola (World Scientific, Singapore, 1999);
9. Quantum Effects in the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model, Proc. Int. Workshop on the MSSM, Barcelona, Spain, 1997, edited by J. Sola (World Scientific, Singapore, 1997);
10. J. Sola, Pramana 51, 239 (1998);
11. W. Hollik and C. Schappacher, Nucl. Phys. B545, 98 (1999);
12. D. Garcia and J. Sola, Phys. Lett. B 357, 349 (1995);
13. D. Garcia, J. Jiminez, and J. Sola, Phys. Lett. B 347, 309 (1995);
14. D. Garcia, J. Jiminez, and J. Sola, Phys. Lett. B 347, 321 (1995).
15. Some representative examples include M. Díaz and D. Ross, hep-ph/0205257;
16. J. Gausch, W. Hollik, and J. Sola, Phys. Lett. B 510, 211 (2001);
17. T. Blank and W. Hollik, hep-ph/0011092;
18. R. Hopker, M. Spira, and P.M. Zerwas, Nucl. Phys. B492, 51 (1997);
19. W. Beenakker, R. Hopker, and P.M. Zenvas, Phys. Lett. B 378, 159 (1996);
20. E. Berger, M. Klasen, and T. Tait, Phys. Rev. D 62, 095014 (2000);
21. M. Berger, B. Harris, M. Klasen, and T. Tait, hep-ph/9903237;
22. W. Beenakker et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3780 (1999);
23. M.A. Diaz, S.F. King, and D.A. Ross, Nucl. Phys. B529, 23 (1998);
24. H. Eberl, A. Bartl, and W. Majerotto, Nucl. Phys. ibid. B472, 481 (1996).
25. R. Hempfling, Phys. Rev. D 49, 6168 (1994);
26. L. Hall, R. Rattazzi, and U. Sarid, Phys. Rev. D ibid. 50, 7048 (1994);
27. M. Carena et al., Nucl. Phys. B426, 269 (1994);
28. R. Rattazzi and U. Sarid, Phys. Rev. D 53, 1553 (1996).
29. H. Baer et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 986 (1997);
30. H. Baer et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 642 E (1998);
31. H. Baer et al., Phys. Rev. D 58, 075008 (1998);
32. H. Baer et al., Phys. Rev. D ibid. 59, 055014 (1999).
33. V. Barger, M. Berger, and P. Ohmann, Phys. Rev. D 49, 4908 (1994);
34. M. Carena and C. Wagner, CERN-TH-7321, 1994;
35. H. Murayama, M. Olechowski, and S. Pokorski, Phys. Lett. B 371, 57 (1996).
36. Y. Fukuda et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2644 (1999);
37. S. Fukuda et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. ibid. 85, 3999 (2000).
38. H. Baer et al., Phys. Rev. D 61, 111701 R (2000);
39. H. Baer et al., Phys. Rev. D ibid. 63, 015007 (2001);
40. H. Baer and J. Ferrandis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 211803 (2001).
41. T. Blazek, R. Dermisek, and S. Raby, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 111804 (2002);
42. Phys. Rev. D 65, 115004 (2002), and references therein.
43. W. Siegel, Phys. Lett. 84B, 193 (1979).
44. K. Melnikov and A. Yelkhovsky, Phys. Rev. D 59, 114009 (1999);
45. A.H. Hoang, Phys. Rev. D ibid. 61, 034005 (2000);
46. M. Beneke and A. Signer, Phys. Lett. B 471, 233 (1999);
47. A.A. Penin and A.A. Pivovarov, Nucl. Phys. B549, 217 (1999).
48. Particle Data Group, D.E. Groom et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 15, 1 (2000).
49. See, e.g., V. Giménez, L. Giusti, G. Martinelli, and F. Rapuano, J. High Energy Phys. 03, 018 (2000);
50. see also S. Ryan, Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 106, 86 (2002), and references therein.
51. MS̄ is evaluated at the scale equal to the running mass; i.e., we drop the superscript MS on the argument of the function.
52. See, for instance, H. Arason et al., Phys. Rev. D 46, 3945 (1992);
53. Pierce et al. [2];
54. Hall et al. [4].
55. R. Tarrach, Nucl. Phys. B183, 384 (1981).
56. N. Gray, D.J. Broadhurst, W. Grafe, and K. Schilcher, Z. Phys. C 48, 673 (1990).
57. J. Fleischer, F. Jegerlehner, O.V. Tarasov, and O.L. Veretin, Nucl. Phys. B539, 671 (1999);
58. J. Fleischer, F. Jegerlehner, O.V. Tarasov, and O.L. Veretin, Nucl. Phys. B571, 511 E (2000).
59. K.G. Chetyrkin and M. Steinhauser, Nucl. Phys. B573, 617 (2000).
60. K.G. Chetyrkin, J.H. Kuhn, and M. Steinhauser, Comput. Phys. Commun. 133, 43 (2000).
61. K. Melnikov and T.v. Ritbergen, Phys. Lett. B 482, 99 (2000).
62. L.V. Avdeev and M.Y. Kalmykov, Nucl. Phys. B502, 419 (1997).
63. O.V. Tarasov, A.A. Vladimirov, and A.Y. Zharkov, Phys. Lett. 93B, 429 (1980).
64. K.G. Chetyrkin, Phys. Lett. B 404, 161 (1997).
65. J.A. Vermaseren, S.A. Larin, and T. van Ritbergen, Phys. Lett. B 405, 327 (1997).
66. K.G. Chetyrkin, B.A. Kniehl, and M. Steinhauser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2184 (1997).
67. I. Antoniadis, C. Kounnas, and K. Tamvakis, Phys. Lett. 119B, 377 (1982).
68. Analogous reasoning also provides an understanding why log(m/μ) terms appear in the relations between the pole mass and short distance masses.
69. G. Rodrigo, M. Bilenky, and A. Santamaria, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 193 (1997);
70. W. Bernreuther, A. Brandenburg, and P. Uwer, Phys. Rev. Lett. ibid. 79, 189 (1997).
71. P. Abreu et al., Phys. Lett. B 418, 430 (1998).
72. This procedure has implicitly been used at the 1-loop level by J.R. Ellis, T. Falk, G. Ganis, K.A. Olive, and M. Srednicki, Phys. Lett. B 510, 236 (2001).