A multichannel automated chamber system for continuous measurement of forest soil CO2 efflux

Tree Physiology

Volumn 23, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 825-832

  Liang, Naishen ^a   Inoue, Gen ^a   Fujinuma, Yasumi ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES   (Japan)

Author keywords

AsiaFlux; Flux chamber; Pinus densiflora; Soil temperature; Spatial variation

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON FLUX; FOREST SOIL; MEASUREMENT METHOD; SOIL TEMPERATURE; SPATIAL VARIATION;

PINUS DENSIFLORA;

EID: 0041854533     PISSN: 0829318X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/treephys/23.12.825     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Baldocchi, D.D., C.A. Vogel and B. Hall. 1997. Seasonal variation of carbon dioxide exchange rates above and below a boreal jack pine forest. Agric. For. Meteorol. 83:147-170.
2. Biscoe, P.V., R.K. Scott and J.L. Monteith. 1975. Barley and its environment. III. Carbon budget of the stand. J. Appl. Ecol. 12:269-291.
3. Conen, F. and K.A. Smith. 2000. An explanation of linear increases in gas concentration under closed chambers used to measure gas exchange between soil and the atmosphere. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 51:111-117.
4. 2 efflux from the surface of soil. Funct. Ecol. 10:297-305.
5. 2 efflux measurement. Funct. Ecol. 12:319-325.
6. Goulden, M.L., S.C. Wofsy, J.W. Harden et al. 1998. Sensitivity of boreal forest carbon balance to soil thaw. Science 279:214-217.
7. Healy, R.W., R.G. Striegl, T.F. Russell, G.L. Hutchinson and G.P. Livingston. 1996. Numerical evaluation of static-chamber measurements of soil-atmosphere gas exchange: identification of physical processes. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 60:740-747.
8. 2 efflux: an in situ comparison of four techniques. Tree Physiol. 20:23-32.
9. 2 flux as an index of soil respiration in situ: a comparison of two chamber methods. Soil Biol. Biochem. 28:1297-1306.
10. Kelliher, F.M., J. Lloyd, A. Arneth et al. 1999. Carbon dioxide efflux density from the floor of a central Siberian pine forest. Agric. For. Meteorol. 94:217-232.
11. Kirita, H. 1971. Re-examination of the absorption method of measuring soil respiration under field conditions. IV. An improved absorption method using a disc of plastic sponge as absorbent holder. Jpn. J. Ecol. 21:119-127.
12. Kutsch, W.L., A. Staack, J. Wötzel, U. Middelhoff and L. Kappen. 2001. Field measurements of root respiration and total soil respiration in an alder forest. New Phytol. 150:157-168.
13. 2 fluxes in a ponderosa pine forest. Agric. For. Meteorol. 94:171-188.
14. Law, B.E., F.M. Kelliher, D.D. Baldocchi, P.M. Anthoni, J. Irvine, D. Moore and S. van Tuyl. 2001. Spatial and temporal variation in respiration in a young ponderosa pine forest during a summer drought. Agric. For. Meteorol. 110:27-43.
15. 2 efflux in a beech forest: comparison of two closed dynamic systems. Plant Soil 214:125-132.
16. 2 efflux. In Extended Abstracts: 6th International Carbon Dioxide Conference. Organizing committee of the 6th International Carbon Dioxide Conference, Sendai, Japan, pp 325-328.
17. Liang, N., Y. Tang and T. Okuda. 2001. Is elevation of carbon dioxide concentration beneficial to seedling photosynthesis in the understory of tropical rain forests? Tree Physiol. 21:1047-1055.
18. 2 efflux in a northern larch (Larix kaempferi Sarg.) forest by in situ comparison of four techniques. Agric. For. Meteorol. In press.
19. Loftfield, N.S., R. Brumme and F. Beese. 1992. Automated monitoring of nitrous oxide and carbon dioxide flux from forest soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56:1147-1150.
20. 2. Global Change Biol. 5:269-281.
21. McGinn, S.M., O.O. Akinremi, H.D.J. McLean and B. Ellert. 1998. An automated chamber system for measuring soil respiration. Can. J. Soil Sci. 78:573-579.
22. Nakadai, T., M. Yokozawa, H. Ikeda and H. Koizumi. 2002. Diurnal changes of carbon dioxide flux from bare soil in agricultural field in Japan. Appl. Soil Ecol. 19:161-171.
23. Nakayama, F.S. 1990. Soil respiration. Remote Sensing Rev. 5:311-321.
24. 2 efflux demonstrated with a laboratory apparatus. Ecology 75:2460-2463.
25. Norman, J.M., C.J. Kucharik, S.T. Gower, D.D. Baldocchi, P.M. Grill, M. Rayment, K. Savage and R.G. Striegl. 1997. A comparison of six methods for measuring soil-surface carbon dioxide fluxes. J. Geophys. Res. 102:28,771-28,777.
26. 2 efflux. Eur J. Soil Sci. 51:107-110.
27. 2 effluxes in the field. J. Geophys. Res. 102:28,779-28,784.
28. 2 efflux in a Canadian boreal forest. Soil Biol. Biochem. 32:35-45.
29. Rochette, P., R.L. Desjardins and E. Pattey. 1991. Spatial and temporal variability of soil respiration in agricultural fields. Can. J. Soil Sci. 71:189-196.
30. Rochette, P., E.G. Gregorich and R.L. Desjardins. 1992. Comparison of static and dynamic closed chambers for measurement of soil respiration under field conditions. Can. J. Soil Sci. 72:605-609.
31. 2 efflux from the soil of a deciduous forest. Can. J. For. Res. 26:1142-1148.
32. Valentini, R., G. Matteucci, A.J. Dolman et al. 2000. Respiration as the main determinant of carbon balance in European forests. Nature 404:861-865.
33. 2 efflux and its spatial and temporal variations in a young ponderosa pine plantation in northern California. Global Change Biol. 7:667-677.
34. 2 and water vapor profiles within and above plant canopies over short periods. Agric. For. Meteorol. 94:1-12.