Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: A story of survival

Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey

Volumn 58, Issue 9, 2003, Pages 561-563

  Parer, J T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; DELIVERY; ELECTRONICS; FEMALE; FETUS DISTRESS; FETUS HEART RATE; HEALTH ECONOMICS; HEART AUSCULTATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL CARE; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; NURSING; PATIENT MONITORING; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; REACTION TIME; RESUSCITATION; SEIZURE; SHORT SURVEY; STILLBIRTH;

ELECTRONICS, MEDICAL; FEMALE; FETAL MONITORING; HEART RATE, FETAL; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS;

EID: 0041837230     PISSN: 00297828     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.OGX.0000083540.83751.85     Document Type: Short Survey

References (13)

1. Banta, HD, Thacker SB. Historical controversy in health technology assessment: the case of electronic fetal monitoring. Obstet Gynecol Survey 2001;56:707-719.
2. Morrison JC, Chez BF, Davis ID, et al. Intrapartum fetal heart rate assessment: monitoring by auscultation or electronic means. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;168:63-66.
3. Benson RC, Shubeck F, Deutschberger J, et al. Fetal heart rate as a predictor of fetal distress. Obstet Gynecol 1968;32:259-266.
4. Thacker SB, Stroup DF, Peterson HB. Efficacy and safety of intrapartum fetal monitoring: an update. 1995;86:613-621.
5. Parer JT. Fetal heart rate monitoring. Lancet 1979;2:632-633.
6. Keith RD, Beckley S, Garibaldi JM, et al. A multicenter comparative study of 17 experts and an intelligent computer system for managing labour using the cardiotocogram. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995;102:688-700.
7. Low JA, Pickersgill H, Killen H, et al. The prediction and prevention of Intrapartum fetal asphyxia in term pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184:724-730.
8. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Research Planning Workshop. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: research guidelines for interpretation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:1385-1390 and JOGN Nursing 1997;26:635-640.
9. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Research Planning Workshop. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: research guidelines for interpretation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:1385-1390 and JOGN Nursing 1997;26:635-640.
10. Garite TJ, Dildy GA, McNamara H, et al. A multicenter controlled trial of fetal pulse oximetry in the intrapartum management of nonreassuring fetal heart rate patterns. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;1831049-1058.
11. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee Opinion No. 258. Fetal pulse oximetry. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:523-524.
12. Westgate J, Harris M, Curnow JSH, et al. Plymouth randomized trial of cardiotocogram only versus ST waveform plus cardiotocogram for intrapartum monitoring. 2400 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;169:151-160.
13. Amer-Wahlin I, Hellsten C, Noren H, et al. Cardiotocography only versus cardiotocography plus ST segment analysis of fetal electrocardiogram for intrapartum fetal monitoring. A Swedish randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2001;358:534-538.