|
Volumn 56, Issue 11, 2001, Pages 707-719
|
Historical controversy in health technology assessment: The case of electronic fetal monitoring
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
CEREBRAL PALSY;
CESAREAN SECTION;
DIAGNOSTIC VALUE;
FETUS HEART;
FETUS MONITORING;
FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT;
HUMAN;
REVIEW;
TECHNOLOGY;
ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL;
AUSCULTATION;
BIRTH INJURIES;
CESAREAN SECTION;
CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCES, NIH;
FEMALE;
FETAL MONITORING;
HUMANS;
MALPRACTICE;
MASS MEDIA;
META-ANALYSIS;
OBSTETRICS;
PREGNANCY;
PUBLIC POLICY;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS;
RESEARCH;
SOCIETIES, MEDICAL;
TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL;
UNITED STATES;
|
EID: 0035195304
PISSN: 00297828
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1097/00006254-200111000-00023 Document Type: Review |
Times cited : (37)
|
References (74)
|