Impact of reproductive history on in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome: Evidence from the German IVF Registry

Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 80, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 508-516

  Kupka, Markus S ^a,b,c   Dorn, Christoph ^a,c   Richter, Oliver ^a,c   Felberbaum, Ricardo ^a,d   Van Der Ven, Hans ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LÜBECK   (Germany)

Author keywords

Age; ICSI; IVF; Miscarriage; Previous conception; Registry; Reproductive history

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ANAMNESIS; ARTICLE; CONCEPTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYOPRESERVATION; DATA ANALYSIS; DISEASE DURATION; ECTOPIC PREGNANCY; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; FEMALE INFERTILITY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GERMANY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; INDUCED ABORTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPONTANEOUS ABORTION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0041834859     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(03)00760-X     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Dicker D., Goldman J.A., Ashkenazi J., Feldberg D., Shelef M., Levy T. Age and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf. 8:1991;141-144.
2. French National Register on In Vitro Fertilization. Contracept Fertil Sex. 25:1997;503-506.
3. Bassil S., Godin P.A., Gillerot S., Verougstraete J.C., Donnez J. In vitro fertilization outcome according to age and follicle-stimulating hormone levels on cycle day 3. J Assist Reprod Genet. 16:1999;236-241.
4. Baeten S., Bouckaert A., Loumaye E., Thomas K. A regression model for the rate of success of in vitro fertilization. Stat Med. 12:1993;1543-1553.
5. Preutthipan S., Amso N., Curtis P., Shaw R.W. Effect of maternal age on clinical outcome in women undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET). J Med Assoc Thai. 79:1996;347-352.
6. Ashkenazi J., Orvieto R., Gold-Deutch R., Feldberg D., Dicker D., Voliovitch I., et al. The impact of woman's age and sperm parameters on fertilization rates in IVF cycles. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 66:1996;155-159.
7. de Mouzon J., Rossin-Amar B., Bachelot A., Renon C., Devecchi A. FIVNAT. Influence of attempt rank in in vitro fertilization. Contracept Fertil Sex. 26:1998;466-472.
8. Tan S.L., Royston P., Campbell S., Jacobs H.S., Betts J., Mason B., et al. Cumulative conception and live birth rates after in-vitro fertilisation. Lancet. 339:1992;1390-1394.
9. Simon A., Ronit C., Lewin A., Mordel N., Zajicek G., Laufer N. Conception rate after in vitro fertilization in patients who conceived in a previous cycle. Fertil Steril. 59:1993;343-347.
10. Hughes EG, King C, Wood EC. A prospective study of prognostic factors in in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 1989;51:838-834.
11. Tan S.L., Doyle P., Maconochie N., Edwards R.G., Balen A., Bekir J., et al. Pregnancy and birth rates of live infants after in vitro fertilization in women with and without previous in vitro fertilization pregnancies a study of eight thousand cycles at one center . Am J Obstet Gynecol. 170:(1 Pt 1):1994;34-40.
12. De Vries M.J., De Sutter P., Dhont M. Prognostic factors in patients continuing in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment and dropouts. Fertil Steril. 72:1999;674-678.
13. Bouckaert A., Psalti I., Loumaye E., De Cooman S., Thomas K. The probability of a successful treatment of infertility by in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 9:1994;448-455.
14. Sukcharoen N., Keith J., Irvine D.S., Aitken R.J. Prediction of the in-vitro fertilization (IVF) potential of human spermatozoa using sperm function tests the effect of the delay between testing and IVF . Hum Reprod. 11:1996;1030-1034.
15. Van Voorhis B.J., Barnett M., Sparks A.E., Syrop C.H., Rosenthal G., Dawson J. Effect of the total motile sperm count on the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of intrauterine insemination and in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 75:2001;661-668.
16. Minaretzis D., Harris D., Alper M.M., Mortola J.F., Berger M.J., Power D. Multivariate analysis of factors predictive of successful live births in in vitro fertilization (IVF) suggests strategies to improve IVF outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet. 15:1998;365-371.
17. Laverge H., De Sutter P., Van der Elst J., Dhont M. A prospective, randomized study comparing day 2 and day 3 embryo transfer in human IVF. Hum Reprod. 16:2001;476-480.
18. Yovich J.L., Matson P.L. The influence of infertility etiology on the outcome of IVF-ET and GIFT treatments. Int J Fertil. 35:1990;26-33.
19. Stolwijk A.M., Wetzels A.M., Braat D.D. Cumulative probability of achieving an ongoing pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection according to a woman's age, subfertility diagnosis and primary or secondary subfertility. Hum Reprod. 15:2000;203-209.
20. Bates G.W., Ginsburg E.S. Early pregnancy loss in in vitro fertilization (IVF) is a positive predictor of subsequent IVF success. Fertil Steril. 77:2002;337-341.
21. Bulletti C., Flarnigni C., Giacomucci E. Reproductive failure due to spontaneous abortion and recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod Update. 2:1996;118-136.
22. Collins J., Graves G. The economic consequences of multiple gestation pregnancy in assisted conception cycles. Hum Fertil (Camb). 3:2000;275-283.
23. Steinberg E.P., Holtz P.M., Sullivan E.M., Villar C.P. Profiling assisted reproductive technology outcomes and quality of infertility management . Fertil Steril. 69:1998;617-623.
24. Lancaster P.A. Registers of in-vitro fertilization and assisted conception. Hum Reprod. 11:(Suppl 4):1996;89-104.
25. de Mouzon J., Bachelot A., Spira A. Establishing a national in vitro fertilization registry methodological problems and analysis of success rates . Stat Med. 12:1993;39-50.
26. Cohen J. The future of international registries for assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril. 76:2001;871-873.
27. Gesetz zum Schutz von Embryonen (Embryonenschutzgesetz-EschG) BGB1 (1990). 1:2746. Available at http://www.bmgesundheit.de/rechts/genfpm/embryo/embryo.htm.
28. Richtlinien der Bundesärztekammer zur Durchführung der assistierten Reproduktion. Deutsches Ärzteblatt 1998;49:A-3166.
29. Nygren K.G., Andersen A.N. The European IVF-monitoring programme (EIM). Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 1998. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. Hum Reprod. 16:2001;2459-2471.
30. Testart J., Plachot M., Mandelbaum J., Salat-Baroux J., Frydman R., Cohen J. World collaborative report on IVF-ET and GIFT 1989 results . Hum Reprod. 7:1992;362-369.
31. Jones H.W. Jr, Cohen J. IFFS surveillance 01. Fertil Steril. 76:(5 Suppl 2):2001;5-36.
32. Vayena E, Rowe PJ, Griffin PD. Current practices and controversies in assisted reproduction - Report of a meeting on "Medical, Ethical and Social Aspects of Assisted Reproduction." Available at http://www.who.int/reproductive-health/infertility/.
33. Felberbaum R., Dahncke W. The German IVF Registry as a quality assurance tool and for use in patient counseling. Gynäkologe. 33:2000;800-811.
34. Adamson G.D., Lancaster P., de Mouzon J., Nygren K.G., Zegers-Hochschild F. A simple headstone or just eliminate the chads? Fertil Steril. 76:2001;1284-1285.
35. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society of Assisted Reproductive Technology, RESOLVE, 1999 Assisted Reproductive Technology Success Rates. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2002. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/drh/ART99/index99.htm; data set, http://www.sartcors.com/#DataCollect.
36. HFEA Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority Annual Report 2000. Available at http://www.hfea.gov.uk/frame3.htm.
37. FIVNAT 2000 report. French National Register on In Vitro Fertilization. Available at http://perso.wanadoo.fr/fivnat.fr/bilan2000.htm.
38. Deutsches IVF-Register DIR, Jahrbuch 2000, Ärztekammer Schleswig-Holstein, Bad-Segeberg, Germany. Available at http://www.deutsches-ivf-register.de.
39. McCullagh P., Nelder J.A. Generalized linear models. 2nd ed: 1989;Chapman and Hall, London.
40. Spira A. Epidemiology of human reproduction. Hum Reprod. 1:1986;111-115.
41. Templeton A., Morris J.K., Parslow W. Factors that affect outcome of in-vitro fertilisation treatment. Lancet. 348:1996;1402-1406.
42. Eimers J.M., te Velde E.R., Gerritse R., Vogelzang E.T., Looman C.W., Habbema J.D. The prediction of the chance to conceive in subfertile couples. Fertil Steril. 61:1994;44-52.
43. Thonneau P., Quesnot S., Ducot B., Marchand S., Fignon A., Lansac J., et al. Risk factors for female and male infertility results of a case-control study . Hum Reprod. 7:1992;55-58.
44. Engmann L., Maconochie N., Tan S.L., Bekir J. Trends in the incidence of births and multiple births and the factors that determine the probability of multiple birth after IVF treatment. Hum Reprod. 16:2001;2598-2605.
45. 1999 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry. Fertil Steril. 78:2002;918-931.
46. Croucher C.A., Lass A., Margara R., Winston R.M. Predictive value of the results of a first in-vitro fertilization cycle on the outcome of subsequent cycles. Hum Reprod. 13:1998;403-408.
47. Ludwig M., Schopper B., Katalinic A., Sturm R., Al-Hasani S., Diedrich K. Experience with the elective transfer of two embryos under the conditions of the German embryo protection law results of a retrospective data analysis of 2573 transfer cycles . Hum Reprod. 15:2000;319-324.