Recognition of guests bearing donor and acceptor hydrogen bonding groups by heteroditopic calix[4]arene receptors

Tetrahedron

Volumn 59, Issue 38, 2003, Pages 7587-7594

  Arduini, Arturo ^a   Brindani, Elisabetta ^a   Giorgi, Giovanna ^a   Pochini, Andrea ^a   Secchi, Andrea ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PARMA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Calix 4 arenes; Heteroditopic receptors; Molecular recognition; Neutral organic guests

Indexed keywords

17,23 BIS(N PHENYLUREIDO)METHYL 25,26 DIPROPOXY 27,28 MONO(CROWN 4)CALIX[4]ARENE; 5 (N PHENYLUREIDO)METHYL 25,27 DIPROPOXYCALIX[4]ARENE; CALIXARENE; CHLORIDE; DIMETHYL SULFOXIDE; FUNCTIONAL GROUP; HYDROGEN; ORGANIC COMPOUND; RECEPTOR; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; UREA DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CHEMICAL BOND; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ELECTRON TRANSPORT; HYDROGEN BOND; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; RIGIDITY; SYNTHESIS;

ARENE;

EID: 0041829474     PISSN: 00404020     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0040-4020(03)01126-8     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Gutsche C.D. Stoddart J.F. Calixarenes Revisited-Monographs in Supramolecular Chemistry. Vol. 6:1998;The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge.
2. Mandolini L., Ungaro R. Calixarenes in Action. 2000;Imperial College, London.
3. Asfari Z., Böhmer V., Harrowfield J., Vicens J. Calixarenes 2001. 2001;Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.
4. Smirnov S., Sidorov V., Pinkhassik E., Havlicek J., Stibor I. Supramol. Chem. 8:1997;187-196.
5. Pinkhassik E., Sidorov V., Stibor I. J. Org. Chem. 63:1998;9644-9651.
6. Arduini A., McGregor W.M., Paganuzzi D., Pochini A., Secchi A., Ugozzoli F., Ungaro R. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2. 1996;839-846.
7. Arduini A., Giorgi G., Pochini A., Secchi A., Ugozzoli F. Tetrahedron. 57:2001;2411-2417.
8. Arena G., Contino A., Magrì A., Sciotto D., Arduini A., Pochini A., Secchi A. Supramol. Chem. 13:2001;379-386.
9. For a recent article on CH/π interactions see e.g. Takahashi O., Khono Y., Iwasaki S., Ko S., Iwaoka M., Tomoda S., Umezawa Y., Tsuboyama S., Nishio M. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 74:2001;2421-2430. and references therein.
10. Nishio M., Hirota M., Umezawa Y. The CH/π Interaction. 1998;Wiley-VCH, New York.
11. Arduini A., Secchi A., Pochini A. J. Org. Chem. 65:2000;9085-9091.
12. See, e.g. Desiraju G.R., Steiner T. The Weak Hydrogen Bond, IUCr Monographs on Crystallography. Vol. 9:1999;Oxford Science, Oxford. and references therein.
13. For a recent paper on directionality of NH/π interaction see: Tsuzuki S., Honda K., Uchimaru T., Mikami M., Tanabe K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112:2000;11450-11458.
14. To the best of our knowledge, the role played by rigidity of calixarene receptors on their complexation efficiencies in apolar solvents has never been systematically studied. Only a few studies have been reported so far in the literature in which the efficiency vs. rigidity has been taken into account, see e.g. Ref. 5.
15. Zaugg H.E. Synthesis. 1970;49-73.
16. Zaugg H.E. Synthesis. 1984;85-110.
17. For the synthesis of calix[4]arene derivatives using the Tscherniac-Einhorn amidomethylation reaction see van Bommel K.J.C., Westerhof F., Verboom W., Reinhoudt D.N., Hulst R. J. Prakt. Chem. 341:1999;284-290.
18. 3). A tentative explanation of such behavior could derive from the possibility of the two ureido sidearms to mutually interact, hence decreasing their ability to cooperatively act as H-bond donor groups.
19. Job P. Ann. Chim. 9:1928;113-203.
20. Connors K.A. Binding Constants. 1987;Wiley, New York.
21. Wilcox C.S. Schneider H.-J., Dürr H. Frontiers of Supramolecular Organic Chemistry and Photochemistry. 1991;123-143 VCH, Weinheim.
22. For a recent review on determination of association constants using NMR data, see: Fielding L. Tetrahedron. 56:2000;6151-6170. and references therein.
23. Matthews W.S., Bares J.E., Bartmess J.E., Bordwell F.G., Cornforth F.J., Drucker G.E., Margolin Z., McCallum R.J., McCollum G.J., Vanier N.R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 97:1975;7006-7014.
24. Bordwell, F. G. Private communication, see http://www.chem.wisc.edu/areas/reich/pkatable/.
25. Bordwell F.G., Bartmess J.E., Hautalal J.A. J. Org. Chem. 43:1978;3095-3101.
26. Bordwell F.G., Ji G.-Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113:1991;8398-8401.
27. Bordwell F.G., Algrim D. J. Org. Chem. 41:1976;2507-2508.
28. For a review about scales of acidity in DMSO, see Bordwell F.G. Acc. Chem. Res. 21:1988;456-463. and references therein.
29. Abraham M.H. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1993;73-83.
30. Abraham M.H., Platts J.A. J. Org. Chem. 66:2001;3481-3491.
31. See, e.g. Mo H., Pochapsky T.C. Prog. Nuclear Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 30:1997;1-38. and references therein.
32. 1H NMR NOESY experiments were performed at different mixing times for the undoubting assignment of the NOE cross-peaks. A further ROESY experiment confirmed the spatial proximity of DMSO methyl groups with several calix[4]arene aromatic protons as depicted in Figure 5.
33. Allen W.E., Gale P.A., Brown C.T., Lynch V.M., Sessler J.A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118:1996;12471-12472.
34. Deetz M.J., Shang M., Smith B.D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122:2000;6201-6207.
35. Seneque O., Rager M.-N., Giorgi M., Reinaud O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122:2000;6183-6189.
36. Zigeneur G., Voglar K., Pitter R. Montash. Chem. 85:1954;1196-1207.
37. Arduini A., Fabbi M., Mantovani M., Mirone L., Pochini A., Secchi A., Ungaro R. J. Org. Chem. 60:1995;1454-1457.
38. Yamamoto H., Sakaki T., Shinkai S. Chem. Lett. 1994;469-472.