Discussion content and perception of deliberation in Western European versus American juries

Psychology, Crime and Law

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 247-463

  Martin, Ana M ^a   Kaplan, Martin F ^b   Alamo, Jose M ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE LA LAGUNA   (Spain)

^b Bell Tower Building   (United States)

Author keywords

Cultural differences; Factions; Groups; Influence processes; Juries; Status

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041743136     PISSN: 1068316X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1068316021000038786     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Arce, R., Fariña, F., Vila, C. and Real, S. (1996). Empirical assessment of the escabinato jury system. Psychology, Crime and the Law, 2, 175-183.
2. Berger, J., Webster, M., Jr. Ridgeway, C. and Rosenholtz, S. J. (1986). Status cues, expectations, and behavior. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.). Advances in Group Processes, vol. 3 (pp. 1-22). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
3. Brandstätter, H., Bleckwenn, M. and Kette, G. (1984). Decision-making of industrial tribunals as described by professional and lay judges. International Reviews of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 137-159.
4. Cajal-Blanco, B. (1994). El cambio de veredicto en el jurado: influencia de variables psicosociales. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Spain.
5. Deutsch, M. and Gerard, H. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgments. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629-639.
6. French, J. R. P. and Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in Social Power (pp. 150-167). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
7. Gómez-Colomer, J. L. (1999). Aplicación paráctica a la Ley del Jurado. In J. Montero-Aroca and J. L. Gómez-Colomer (Eds), Comentarios a la Ley del Jurado (pp. 1159-1180). Pamplona: Aranzadi.
8. Hansen, K. L., Schaefer, E. G. and Lawless, J. J. (1993). Temporal pattern of normative, informational, and procedural-legal discussion in jury deliberations. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 14, 33-46.
9. Hastie, R., Penrod, S. and Pennington, N. (1983). Inside the Jury, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10. Insko, C. A., Smith, R. H., Alicke, M. D., Wade, J. and Taylor, S. (1985). Conformity and group size: the concern with being right and the concern with being liked. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 41-50.
11. Kaplan, M. F. (1989). Task, situational, and personal determinants of influence processes in group decision making. In E. J. Lawler and B. Markovsky (Eds), Advances in Group Processes (pp. 87-105), vol. 6. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
12. Kaplan, M. F. and Martin, A. (1999). Effects of differential status of group members on process and outcome of deliberation. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 2, 347-364.
13. Kaplan, M. F. and Martin, A. (2000). The influence of expert and non-expert members of juries: the Spanish jury as an illustration. In S. Nagel (Ed.), Handbook of Golbal Legal Policy (Chapter 12, pp. 209-222). New York: Marcel Dekker.
14. Kaplan, M. F. and Miller, C. (1987). Group decision making and normative versus informational influence: effects of type of issue and assigned decision rule. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 306-313.
15. Kaplan, M. F., Schaefer, E. G. and Zinkiewicz, L. (1994). Member preferences for discussion content in anticipated group decisions: effects of type of issue and group interactive goal. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 15, 489-508.
16. Kelly, Jackson, J.W. and Hutson-Comeaux, S.L. (1997). The effect of time pressure and task differences on influence modes and accuracy in problem-solving groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 10-22.
17. Kerr, N. L. (1982). Social transition schemes: model, method and applications. In H. Brandstatter, J. H. Davis, and G. Stocker-Kreichgauer (Eds), Group Decision Making (pp. 59-79). London: Academic Press.
18. Kerr, N. L. and MacCoun, R. J. (1985). The effect of jury size and polling method on the process and product of jury deliberation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 349-363.
19. Laughlin, P. and Ellis, A. (1986). Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 177-189.
20. Montero-Aroca, J. and Gómez-Colomer, J. L. (Eds) (1999). Comentarios a la Ley del Jurado. Pamplona: Aranzadi.
21. Munday, R. (1993). Jury trial, continental style. Legal Stud., 13, 205-224.
22. Nemeth, C. J. (1985). Procesos de grupo y de jurado: Estados Unidos y Francia. In S. Moscovici (Ed.), Psicología Social, vol. 2 (pp. 279-305). Barcelona: Paidós [Original work published in 1984].
23. Ohtsubo, Y., Fujita, M. and Kameda, T. (2001). How can psychology contribute to designing a mixed jury system in Japan?: Ongoing debates and a thought experiment. Unpublished manuscript, Hokkaido University.
24. Padawer-Singer, A. M., Singer, A. N. and Singer, R. S. L. (1977). An experimental study of twelve- vs. six-member juries under unanimous vs. nonunanimous decisions. In B. D. Sales (Ed.), Psychology in the Legal Process (pp. 77-86). New York: Spectrum.
25. Palmer, A. (1988). El Jurado y la Psicologia Social. Barcelona: PPU.
26. Planchadell-Gargallo, A. (1999a). El sistema mixto austriaco. In J. Montero-Aroca and J. L. Gómez-Colomer (Eds.), Comentarios a la Ley del Jurado (pp. 113-116). Pamplona: Aranzadi.
27. Planchadell-Gargallo, A. (1999b). El escabinato portugues. In J. Montero-Aroca and J. L. Gómez-Colomer (Eds), Comentarios a la Ley del Jurado (pp. 109-113). Pamplona: Aranzadi.
28. Rugs, D. and Kaplan, M. F. (1993). Effectiveness of informational and normative influences in group decision making depends on group interactive goal. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 147-158.
29. Saks, M. J. (1977). The Role of Group Size and Social Decision Rule. Lexington, MA: Heath.
30. Thaman, S. (2001). Europe's new jury systems: the cases of Spain and Russia. In N. Vidmar (Ed.), World Jury Systems (pp. 319-351). Oxford, UK.: Oxford University Press.
31. Tanford, S. and Penrod, S. (1986). Jury deliberation: discussion content and influence processes in jury decision making. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 4, 322-347.
32. Toharia, J. (1993). Actitudes de los españoles ante la Administracion de Justicia. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociologicas.
33. Vidmar (2001) (Ed.), World Jury Systems. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.