The Influence of Expert and Non-Expert Members of Juries: The Spanish Jury as an Illustration

Handbook of Global Legal Policy

Volumn , Issue , 2022, Pages 209-222

  Kaplan, Martin F ^a   Martin, Ana M ^b  

^a NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE LA LAGUNA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0043244292     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780429272745-12     Document Type: Chapter

References (29)

1. Berger, J., Rosenholtz, S., and Zelditch, M. (1980). Status organizing processes. Annual Review of Sociology 6, 479-508.
2. Brandstatter, H., Bleckwenn, M., and Kette, G. (1984). Decision making of industrial tribunals as described by professional and lay judges. International Review of Applied Psychology 33, 137-159.
3. Casper, J., and Zeisel, H. (1972). Lay judges in the German criminal courts. Journal of Legal Studies 1, 135-191.
4. Cohen, E. G. (1982). Expectation states and interracial interaction in school settings. Annual Review of Sociology 8, 209-235.
5. De Paul, P. (1995). El tribunal del jurado desde la Psicologia Social. Madrid, Spain: Siglo XXI.
6. Deutsch, M., and Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgments. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 51, 629-639.
7. Diamond, S. (1988). When laypersons set the sentences in criminal courts. Unpublished manuscript. Chicago: University of Illinois.
8. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum.
9. French, J., and Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power, 150-167. In D. Cart-wright (ed.), Studies in social power. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
10. Gisbert, A. (1990). El futuro tribunal popular espanol. Barcelona, Spain: PPU.
11. Kaplan, M. F. (1989). Task, situational, and personal determinants of influence processes in group decision making, 87-105. In E. J. Lawler and B. Markovsky (eds.). Advances in Group Processes. Vol. 6. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
12. Kaplan, M. F., and Krupa, S. (1986). Severe penalties under the control of others can reduce guilt verdicts. Law and Psychology Review 10, 1-18.
13. Kaplan, M. F., and Martin, A. M. (1999). Effects of differential status of group members on process and outcome of deliberation. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 2 (in press).
14. Kaplan, M. F., and Miller, C. E. (1987). Group decision making and normative versus informational influence: Effects of type of issue and assigned decision rule. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 33, 306-313.
15. Kirchler, E., and Davis, J. H. (1986). The influence of member status differences and task type on group consensus and member position change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51, 83-91.
16. Latane, B., and Wolf, S. (1981). The social impact of minorities and majorities. Psychological Review 88, 438-453.
17. Laughlin, P. R., and Ellis, A. L. (1986). Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 22, 177-189.
18. Levinger, G. (1959). The development of perceptions and behavior in newly formed social power relationships, 83-93. In D. Cartwright (ed.), Studies in Social Power. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
19. Mohn, A. D., and Hedley, M. (1991). Gender, power, and social exchange, 157-180. In C. L. Ridgeway and D. Diekema (eds.), Gender, interaction, and inequality. New York, NY: Springcr-Vcrlag.
20. Nemeth, C. J. (1984). Proceso de grupo y jurados: Estados Unidos y Francia, 279-305. In S. Moscovici (ed.), Psicologia social: Volumen 2: Individuos y Grupos. Barcelona, Spain: Paidos.
21. Nemeth, C. J. (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review 93, 23-32.
22. Rubin, J. Z., and Brown, B. R. (1975). The social psychology of bargaining and negotiation. New York: Academic Press.
23. Rugs, D., and Kaplan, M. F. (1993). Effectiveness of informational and normative influences in group decision making depends on group interactive goal. British Journal of Social Psychology 32, 147-158.
24. Sachdev, I., and Bourhis, R. Y. (1991). Power and status differentials in minority and majority group relations. European Journal of Social Psychology 21, 1-24.
25. Sev’er, A. (1989). Simultaneous effect of status and task cues: Combining, eliminating, or buffering? Social Psychology Quarterly 52, 327-335.
26. Soriano, R. (1985). El nuevo jurado espanol. Barcelona, Spain: Ariel.
27. Strodtbeck, F. L., James, R. N., and Hawkins, C. (1957). Sociological status injury deliberation. American Sociological Review 22, 713-719.
28. Tindale, R. S., Davis, J. H., Vollrath, D. A., Nagao, D. H, and Hinsz, V. B. (1990). Asymmetrical social influence in freely interacting groups: A test of three models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58, 438-449.
29. Wood, W., Lundgren, S., Ouelette, J. A., Busceme, S., and Blackstone, T. (1994). Minority influence: A meta-analytic review of social influence processes. Psychological Bulletin 115, 323-345.