The evolution of the laterophysic connection with a revised phylogeny and taxonomy of butterflyfishes (Teleostei: Chaetodontidae)

Cladistics

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 287-306

  Smith, Wm Leo ^a,b,c   Webb, Jacqueline F ^c   Blum, Stanley D ^d  

^a DIVISION OF INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY   (United States)

^b Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^c VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLADISTICS; FISH; MORPHOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; TAXONOMY;

AMPHICHAETODON; CHAETODON; CHAETODONTIDAE; FORCIPIGER; PARACHAETODON OCELLATUS; PROGNATHODES; TELEOSTEI;

EID: 0041738990     PISSN: 07483007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2003.tb00374.x     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Allen, G.R., 1980. Butterfly and Angelfishes of the World. Wiley, New York.
2. Allen, G.R., Steene, R., Allen, M., 1998. A Guide to Angelfishes and Butterflyfishes. Odyssey Publishing, El Cajon, CA.
3. Bleeker, P., 1873. Mémoire sur la faune ichthyologique de Chine. Neder. Tijdschr. Dierk. 4, 113-154.
4. Bleeker, P., 1877. Révision des espéces insulindiennes de la famille des Chétodontoïdes. Versl. Akad. Amsterdam 17 (Ser. 2), 1-174.
5. Blum, S.D., 1988. The osteology and phylogeny of the Chaetodontidae (Teleostei: Perciformes). Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Hawaii, Honolulu. Available from 〈 http://www.calacademy.org/research/informatics/sblum/pub/〉.
6. Blum, S.D., 1989. Biogeography of the Chaetodontidae: an analysis of allopatry among closely related species. Environ. Biol. Fish. 25, 9-31.
7. Bremer, K., 1994. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10, 295-304.
8. Brooks, D.R., McLennan, D.A., 1991. Phylogeny, Ecology, and Behavior: A Research Program in Comparative Biology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
9. Burgess, W.E., 1978. Butterflyfishes of the World. Tropical Fish Hobbyist, Neptune City, NJ.
10. Burgess, W.E., 2001. Prognathodes brasiliensis, a new species of butterflyfish (Teleostei: Chaetodontidae) from southern Brazil. Trop. Fish Hobbyist 49, 55-63.
11. Coddington, J., 1988. Cladistic tests of adaptational hypotheses. Cladistics 4, 3-22.
12. Farris, J.S., 1989. The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. Cladistics 5, 417-419.
13. Farris, J.S., Albert, V.A., Källersjö, M., Lipscomb, D., Kluge, A.G., 1996. Parsimony jackknifing outperforms neighbor-joining. Cladistics 12, 99-124.
14. Farris, J.S., Kluge, A.G., Eckardt, M.J., 1970. A numerical approach to phylogenetic systematics. Syst. Zool. 19, 172-189.
15. Ferry-Graham, L.A., Wainwright, P.C., Hulsey, C.D., Bellwood, D.R., 2001. Evolution and mechanics of long jaws in butterflyfishes (family Chaetodontidae). J. Morphol. 248, 120-143.
16. Findley, J.S., Findley, M.T., 2001. Global, regional, and local patterns in species richness and abundance of butterflyfishes. Ecol. Monogr. 71, 69-91.
17. Gill, A.C., 1999. Subspecies, geographic forms and widespread Indo-Pacific coral-reef fish species: a call for change in taxonomic practice. In: Séret, B., Sire, J.Y. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Indo-Pac. Fish Conf. (Noumea, 3-8 November 1997). Société Française d'Ichtyologie and Inst. Res. Dévelop, Paris, pp. 79-87.
18. Goloboff, P.A., 1995. A revision of the South American spiders of the family Nemesiidae (Araneae, Mygalomorphae). Part I: Species from Peru, Chile, Argentina, and Uruguay. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. N. Y. 224, 1-189.
19. Goloboff, P.A., 1999. NONA ver. 2.0. Program and documentation. Fundación e Instituto Miguel Lillo, Tucumán, Argentina.
20. Hauser, D.L., Presch, W., 1991. The effect of ordered characters on phylogenetic reconstruction. Cladistics 7, 243-265.
21. Hourigan, T.F., 1989. Environmental determinants of butterflyfish social systems. Environ. Biol. Fish. 25, 61-78.
22. Jordan, D.S., 1963. The Genera of Fishes and a Classification of Fishes (reprint). Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
23. Kearney, M., 2002. Fragmentary taxa, missing data, and ambiguity: mistaken assumptions and conclusions. Syst. Biol. 51, 369-381.
24. Kluge, A.G., Farris, J.S., 1969. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Syst. Zool. 18, 1-32.
25. Kluge, A.G., Wolf, A.J., 1993. Cladistics: what's in a word? Cladistics 9, 183-199.
26. Kuiter, R.H., 1995. Chaetodon lunulatus, a sibling species of C. trifasciatus, with observations on other sibling species of butterflyfishes (Chaetodontidae). Rev. Fr. Aquariol. 21, 105-106.
27. Kuiter, R.H., Debelius, H., 1999. Description of a new butterflyfish, Chaetodon andamanensis, from the eastern Indian Ocean. Senckenb. Biol. 79, 231-235.
28. Leis, J.M., 1989. Larval biology of butterflyfishes (Pisces, Chaetodontidae): what do we really know? Environ. Biol. Fish. 25, 87-100.
29. Leviton, A.E., Gibbs Jr., R.H., Heal, E., Dawson, C.E., 1985. Standards in herpetology and ichthyology: Part I. Standard symbolic codes for institutional resource collections in herpetology and ichthyology. Copeia 1985, 802-832.
30. Lipscomb, D.L., 1992. Parsimony, homology and the analysis of multistate characters. Cladistics 8, 45-65.
31. Mabee, P.M., 1988. Supraneural and predorsal bones in fishes: development and homologies. Copeia 1998, 827-838.
32. Maddison, W.P., 1993. Missing data versus missing characters in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42, 576-581.
33. Maugé, A., Bauchot, R., 1984. Les genres et sous-genres de chaetodontides estudies par une methode d'analyse numerique. Bull. Mus. Natn. Hist. nat., Paris, ser. 4.6, Sec. a. 2. 453-485.
34. McMillan, W.O., Palumbi, S.R., 1995. Concordant evolutionary patterns among indo-west pacific butterflyfishes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. (B Biol. Sci.). 260, 229-236.
35. McMillan, W.O., Palumbi, S.R., 1997. Rapid rate of control-region evolution in pacific butterflyfishes (Chaetodontidae). J. Mol. Evol. 45, 473-484.
36. McMillan, W.O., Weigt, L.A., Palumbi, S.R., 1999. Color pattern evolution, assortative mating, and genetic differentiation in brightly colored butterflyfishes (Chaetodontidae). Evolution 53, 247-260.
37. Mickevich, M.F., 1982. Transformation series analysis. Syst. Zool. 31, 461-478.
38. Nalbant, T.T., 1971. On butterfly fishes from the Atlantic, Indian and Pacific Oceans (Pisces, Perciformes, Chaetodontidae). Steenstrupia 1, 207-228.
39. Nalbant, T.T., 1973. Studies on chaetodontid fishes with some remarks on their taxonomy (Pisces, Perciformes, Chaetodontidae). Trav. Mus. Nat. Grigore Antipa. 13, 303-331.
40. Nalbant, T.T., 1974. Some osteological characters in butterflyfishes with special reference to their phylogeny and evolution (Pisces: Perciformes. Chaetodontidae). Trav. Mus. Nat. Grigore Antipa. 15, 303-319.
41. Nalbant, T.T., 1984. Studies on chaetodont fishes. 2. Heminigellus, a new genus of butterfly fishes (Pisces, Chaetodontidae). Trav. Mus. Nat. Grigore Antipa. 26, 239-240.
42. Nalbant, T.T., 1986. Studies on chaetodont fishes. III. Redescription of the genus Roaops Maugé & Bauchot, 1984, and some problems of the phylogeny and evolution of butterflyfishes (Pisces, Chaetodontidae). Trav. Mus. Nat. Grigore Antipa. 28, 163-176.
43. Nalbant, T.T., 1991. Studies on chaetodont fishes 4. A new deep-water butterflyfish genus from the indo-west-pacific (Pisces: Perciformes, Chaetodontidae). Trav. Mus. Nat. Grigore Antipa. 31, 421-426.
44. Nalbant, T.T., 1995. The genus Prognathodes (Pisces: Chaetodontidae) in eastern Pacific Ocean (Baja California Galápagos) with a discussion on the phylogeny of the group. Trav. Mus. Nat. Grigore Antipa. 35, 497-526.
45. Nixon, K.C., 1999. WinClada (beta) ver. 0.9.9. Published by the author, Ithaca, NY.
46. Pimentel, R.A., Riggins, R., 1987. The nature of cladistic data. Cladistics 3, 201-209.
47. Pothoff, T., 1984. Clearing and staining techniques. In: Moser, H.G., Richards, W.J., Cohen, D., Fahay, M.P., Kendall, A.W., Richardson, S.L. (Eds.), Ontogeny and Systematics of Fishes: The Elbert H. Ahlstrom Memorial Symposium. Allen Press. Lawrence, KS. pp. 35-37.
48. Pyle, R., 2001. Chaetodontidae: butterflyfishes. In: Carpenter, K.E., Niem, V.II. (Eds.), Species Identification Guide for Fishery Purposes. The Living Marine Resources of the Western Central Pacific. Bony fishes part 3 (Menidae to Pomacentridae). Food and Agricultural Organization. Rome. pp. 3224-3265.
49. Reese, E.S., 1975. A comparative field study of the social behavior and related ecology of reef fishes of the family Chaetodontidae. Z. Tierpsychol. 37, 37-61.
50. Salm, R.V., Mee, J.K.L., 1989. Chaetodon dialeucos sp. nov. A new species of shallow water butterflyfish from the northwest Atlantic Ocean. Freshwater Mar. Aquar. 12, 8-9, 11, 131.
51. Sano, M., 1989. Feeding habits of Japanese butterflyfishes (Chaetodontidae). Environ. Biol. Fish. 25, 195-203.
52. Smith, W.L., 2001. Variation in the morphology of the laterophysic connection in butterflyfishes of the genus Chaetodon. M.Sc. Thesis, Villanova University, Villanova, PA.
53. Tyler, J.C., Johnson, G.D., Nakamura, I., Collette, B.B., 1989. Morphology of Luvarus imperialis (Luvaridae), with a phylogenetic analysis of the Acanthuroidei (Pisces). Smithson, Contrib. Zool. 485, 1-78.
54. Webb, J.F., 1998. Laterophysic connection: a unique link between the swimbladder and the lateral-line system in Chaetodon (Perciformes: Chaetodontidae). Copeia 1998, 1032-1036.
55. Webb, J.F., Blum, S.D., 1990. A swimbladder-lateral-line connection in the butterflyfish genus Chaetodon (Perciformes: Chaetodontidae). Am. Zool. 30, 90A.
56. Webb, J.F., Smith, W.L., 2000. The laterophysic connection in chaetodontid butterflyfish: morphological variation and speculations on sensory function. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. (B Biol. Sci.) 355, 1125-1129.
57. Wenzel, J.W., 1997. When is a phylogenetic test good enough? In: Grandcolas (Ed.). The Origin of Biodiversity in Insects: Phylogenetic Tests of Evolutionary Scenarios. Mém. Mus. Natn. Hist. nat. Paris, France, pp. 31-45.
58. Wilkinson, M., 1992. Ordered versus unordered characters Cladistics 8, 375-385.
59. Yabuta, S., 2002. Uncertainty in partner recognition and the tail-up display in a monogamous butterflyfish. Anim. Behav. 63, 165-173.