Alcohol consumption increases attractiveness ratings of opposite-sex faces: A possible third route to risky sex

Addiction

Volumn 98, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 1069-1075

  Jones, Barry T ^a   Jones, Ben C ^b   Thomas, Andy P ^a   Piper, Jessica ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Alcohol expectancy; Alcohol myopia; Facial attractiveness; Nucleus accumbens; Risky sex

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ARTICLE; CATERING SERVICE; COLLEGE STUDENT; COMPUTER; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEUS ACCUMBENS; RATING SCALE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUALITY; UNIVERSITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALCOHOL DRINKING; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; PHOTOGRAPHY; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 0041703226     PISSN: 09652140     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00426.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Agocha, V. B. & Cooper, M. L. (1999) Risk perceptions and safer-sex intentions: does a partner's physical attractiveness undermine the use of risk-relevant information? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 746-759.
2. Aharon, I., Etcoff, N., Ariely, D., Chabris, C. F., O'Connor, E. O. & Breiter, H. C. (2001) Beautiful faces have variable reward value: fMRI and behavioral evidence. Neuron, 32, 537-551.
3. Boileau, I., Benkelfat, C., Assad, J. M., Leyton, M., Pihl, R. O. & Dagher, A. (2001) Acute ethanol consumption increases synaptic dopamine in ventral striatum: a PET/11C-raclopride study in healthy volunteers. Neuroimage, 13, S1029.
4. Bornstein, R. F. (1989) Exposure and affect - overview and meta-analysis of research 1968-87. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265-289.
5. British Medical Association (2002) Sexually Transmitted Infections, London: British Medical Association Board of Science and Education Report.
6. Bruce, V. & Young, A. (1986) Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 305-327.
7. Buss, D. M. & Schmitt, D. (1993) Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204-232.
8. Cooper, M. L. (2002) Alcohol use and risky sexual behavior among college students and youth: evaluating the evidence. Journal of Studies on Alcohol Supplement, 14, 101-107.
9. Dagher, A., Boileau, I., Small, D., Benkelfat, C., Asaad, J. M., Pihl, R. & Leyton, M. (2002) The effect of natural rewards and abused drugs on the dopamine system: similarities and differences, Neuroimage, 16, 2, S12.
10. Enquist, M., Ghirlanda, S., Lundqvist, D. & Wachtmeister, C. A. (2002) An ethological theory of attractiveness. In: Rhodes, G. & Zebrowitz, L. A., eds. Facial Attractiveness - Evolutionary, Cognitive and Social Perspectives, pp. 127-153. Connecticut: Ablex.
11. Fromme, K., D'Amico, E. J. & Katz, E. C. (1999) Intoxicated sexual risk taking: an expectancy or cognitive impairment explanation? Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 60, 54-63.
12. Furnham, A., Tan, T. & McManus, C. (1997) Waist-to-hip ratio and preferences for body shape: a replication and extension. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 539-549.
13. Gangestad, S. W. & Buss, D. M. (1993) Pathogen prevalence and human mate preferences. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 89-96.
14. Gladue, B. A. & Delaney, H. J. (1990) Gender differences in perception of attractiveness of men and women in bars. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 378-391.
15. Grammar, K. & Thornhill, R. (1994) Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108, 232-242.
16. Halberstadt, J. & Rhodes, G. (2000) The attractiveness of non-face averages: implications for an evolutionary explanation of the attractiveness of average faces. Psychological Science, 11, 285-289.
17. Halpern-Felsher, B. L. Millstein, S. G. & Ellen, J. M. (1996) Relationship of alcohol use and risky sexual behavior: a review and analysis of findings. Journal of Adolescent Health, 19, 331-336.
18. Hume, D. K. & Montgomerie, R. (2001) Facial attractiveness signals different aspects of quality in men and women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 93-112.
19. Huston, J. L. (1973) Ambiguity of acceptance, social desirability anddating choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 9, 32-42.
20. Jones, B. C., Jones, B. T., Blundell, L. & Bruce, G. (2002) Social users of alcohol and cannabis who detect substance-related changes in a change blindness paradigm report higher levels of use than those detecting substance-neutral changes. Psychopharmacology, 165, 93-96.
21. Jones, B. T., Jones, B. C., Smith, H. & Copley, N. (2003) A flicker paradigm for inducing change blindness reveals alcohol and cannabis information processing biases in social users. Addiction, 98, 235-244.
22. Jones, B. C., Little, A. C. & Perrett, D. I. (2003) Why are symmetrical faces attractive? In: Columbus, F., ed. Advances in Psychology Research, New York: Nova Science (in press).
23. Leigh, B. C. (1999) Peril, chance, adventure: concepts of risk, alcohol use and risky behavior in young adults. Addiction, 94, 371-383.
24. Light, L. L., Hollander, S. & Kayra-Stuart, F. (1981) Why attractive people are harder to remember. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 269-276.
25. McKay, D. & Schare, M. L. (1999) Effects of alcohol and alcohol expectancies on subjective reports and physiological reactivity: a meta-analysis. Addictive Behaviors, 24, 633-647.
26. Nicola, S. M., Surmeier, D. J. & Malenka, R. C. (2000) Dopaminergic modulation of neuronal excitability in the striatum and nucleus accumbens. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23, 185-215.
27. Rhodes, G., Halberstadt, J. & Brajkovich, G. (2001) Generalization of mere exposure effects in social stimuli. Social Cognition, 19, 57-70.
28. Rhodes, G., Sumich, A. & Byatt, G. (1999) Are average facial configurations attractive only because of their symmetry? Psychological Science, 10, 52-58.
29. Rhodes, G., Zebrowitz, L., Clark, A., Kalick, S. M., Hightower, A. & McKay, R. (2001) Do facial averageness and symmetry signal health? Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 31-46.
30. Simpson, J. A. & Gangestad, S. W. (1991) Individual differences in sociosexuality: evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 870-883.
31. Sobell, L. C. & Sobell, M. B. (1992) Timeline follow-back: a technique for assessing self-reported alcohol consumption. In: Litten, R. Z. & Allen, J. P., eds. Measuring Alcohol Consumption: Psychosocial and Biochemical Methods, pp. 41-72. Totowa, NJ: Humana.
32. Steele, C. M. & Josephs, R. A. (1990) Alcohol myopia: its prized and dangerous effects. American Psychologist, 45, 921-933.
33. Walster, E., Aronson, V., Abrahams, D. & Rottman, L. (1966) Importance of physical attractiveness in dating behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 508-516.
34. Yim, H. J. & Gonzales, R. A. (2000) Ethanol-induced increases in dopamine extracellular concentration in rat nucleus accumbens are accounted for by increased release and not uptake inhibition. Alcohol, 22, 107-115.
35. Zajonc, R. B. (1968) Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 1-27.