Comparison of contrast-enhanced T1-weighted and 3D constructive interference in steady state images for predicting outcome after hearing-preservation surgery for vestibular schwannoma

Neuroradiology

Volumn 45, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 476-481

  Kocaoglu, M ^a   Bulakbasi, N ^a   Ucoz, T ^a   Ustunsoz, B ^a   Pabuscu, Y ^b   Tayfun, C ^a   Somuncu, I ^a  

^a GULHANE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Turkey)

^b CELAL BAYAR UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Magnetic resonance imaging; Pulse sequences; Surgery; Vestibular schwannoma

Indexed keywords

GADODIAMIDE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FACIAL NERVE; FACIAL NERVE PARALYSIS; FEMALE; HEARING; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERNAL AUDITORY CANAL; MALE; NEURILEMOMA; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; STEADY STATE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUMOR VOLUME; VESTIBULAR NERVE;

ADULT; CONTRAST MEDIA; EAR, INNER; FACIAL NERVE; FACIAL NERVE INJURIES; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HEARING DISORDERS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEUROMA, ACOUSTIC; OTOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; WEIGHTS AND MEASURES;

EID: 0041630919     PISSN: 00283940     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00234-003-1006-0     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Davidson HC (2001) Imaging evaluation of sensorineural hearing loss. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI 22: 229-249
2. Portier F, Herman P, Lot G, Tran Ba Huy P (2002) Contribution and cost-effectiveness of ABR and MRI in acoustic neuroma screening. Retrospective study of 151 cases. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac 119: 67-72
3. Valvassori GE, Palacios E (2000) Magnetic resonance imaging of the internal auditory canal. Top Magn Reson Imaging 11: 52-65
4. Allen RW, Harnsberger HR, Shelton C, et al (1996) Low-cost high-resolution fast spin-echo MR of acoustic schwannoma: an alternative to enhanced conventional spin-echo MR? AJNR 17: 1205-1210
5. Enzmann DR, O'Donohue J (1987) Optimizing MR imaging for detecting small tumors in the cerebellopontine angle and internal auditory canal. AJNR 8: 99-106
6. Schmalbrock P, Chakeres DW, Monroe JW, Saraswat A, Miles BA, Welling DB (1999) Assessment of internal auditory canal tumors: a comparison of contrast-enhanced T1-weighted and steady-state T2-weighted gradient-echo MR imaging. AJNR 20: 1207-1213
7. Stuckey SL, Harris AJ, Mannolini SM (1996) Detection of acoustic schwannoma: use of constructive interference in steady state three-dimensional MR. AJNR 17: 1219-1225
8. Donnelly MJ, Cass AD, Ryan L (1994) False-positive MRI in the diagnosis of small intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas. J Laryngol Otol 108: 986-988
9. Maeta M, Saito R, Nameki H (2001) False-positive magnetic resonance image in the diagnosis of small acoustic neuroma. J Laryngol Otol 115: 842-844
10. Sartoretti-Schefer S, Kollias S, Valavanis A (2000) Spatial relationship between vestibular schwannoma and facial nerve on three-dimensional T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR images. AJNR 21: 810-816
11. Iwayama E, Naganawa S, Ito T, et al (1999) High-resolution MR cisternography of the cerebellopontine angle: 2D versus 3D fast spin-echo sequences. AJNR 20: 889-895
12. Casselman JW, Kuhweide R, Deimling M, Ampe W, Dehaene I, Meeus L (1993) Constructive interference in steady state-3DFT MR imaging of the inner ear and cerebellopontine angle. AJNR 14: 47-57
13. Lemmerling M, De Praeter G, Caemaert J, et al (1999) Accuracy of single-sequence MRI for investigation of the fluid-filled spaces in the inner ear and cerebellopontine angle. Neuroradiology 41: 292-299
14. Kurucay S, Schmalbrock P, Chakeres DW, Keller PJ (1997) A segment-interleaved motion-compensated acquisition in the steady state (SIMCAST) technique for high-resolution imaging of the inner ear. J Magn Reson Imaging 7: 1060-1068
15. Shigematsu Y, Korogi Y, Hirai T, et al (1999) Contrast-enhanced CISS MRI of vestibular schwannomas: phantom and clinical studies. J Comput Assist Tomogr 23: 224-231
16. American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (1995) Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma (vestibular schwannoma). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 113: 179-180
17. Dubrulle F, Ernest O, Vincent C, Vaneecloo FM, Lejeune JP, Lemaitre L (2000) Cochlear fossa enhancement at MR evaluation of vestibular schwannoma: correlation with success at hearing-preservation surgery. Radiology 215: 458-462
18. Louis E, Lejeune JP, Vaneecloo FM, Vincent C, Angot A, Christiaens JL (1997) Results of hearing preservation in surgery of vestibular schwannoma: value of combined retrosigmoid and middle fossa approaches. Neurochirurgie 43: 8-14
19. Koos WT, Spetzler RF, Bock FW, Salah S (1976) Microsurgery of cerebellopontine angle tumors. In: Koos WT, Bock FW, Spetzler RF (eds) Clinical microneurosurgery. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 91-112
20. Shin YJ, Fraysse B, Cognard C, et al (2000) Effectiveness of conservative management of acoustic neuromas. Am J Otol 21: 857-862
21. Walsh RM, Bath AP, Bance ML, Keller A, Tator CH, Rutka JA (2000) The role of conservative management of vestibular schwannomas. Clin Otolaryngol 25: 28-39
22. Niemczyk K, Vaneecloo FM, Lemaitre L, et al (1999) The growth of acoustic neuromas in volumetric radiologic assessment. Am J Otol 20: 244-248
23. Vokurka EA, Herwadkar A, Thacker NA, Ramsden RT, Jackson A (2002) Using Bayesian tissue classification to improve the accuracy of vestibular schwannoma volume and growth measurement AJNR 23: 459-467
24. Glasscock ME, Hays JW, Minor LB, Haynes DS, Carrasco VN (1993) Preservation of hearing in surgery for acoustic neuromas. J Neurosurg 78: 864-870
25. Haines SJ, Levine SC (1993) Intracanalicular acoustic neuroma: early surgery for preservation of hearing. J Neurosurg 79: 515-520
26. Wade PJ, House WF (1984) Hearing preservation in patients with acoustic neuromas via the middle fossa approach. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 92: 184-193
27. Brackmann DE, Owens RM, Friedman RA, et al (2000) Prognostic factors for hearing preservation in vestibular schwannoma surgery. Am J Otol 21: 417-424
28. Somers T, Casselman J, de Ceulaer G, Govaerts P, Offeciers E (2001) Prognostic value of magnetic resonance imaging findings in hearing preservation surgery for vestibular schwannoma. Otol Neurotol 22: 87-94
29. Hampton SM, Adler J, Atlas MD (2000) Evaluating the role of magnetic resonance imaging scans in the surgical management of acoustic neuromas. Laryngoscope 110: 1194-1197
30. Moriyama T, Fukushima T, Asaoka K, Roche PH, Barrs DM, McElveen JT Jr (2002) Hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma surgery: importance of adhesion between the cochlear nerve and the tumor. J Neurosurg 97: 337-340
31. Selesnick SH, Rebol J, Heier LA, Wise JB, Gutin PH, Lavyne MH (2001) Internal auditory canal involvement of acoustic neuromas: surgical correlates to magnetic resonance imaging findings. Otol Neurotol 22: 912-916
32. Lapsiwala SB, Pyle GM, Kaemmerle AW, Sasse FJ, Badie B (2002) Correlation between auditory function and internal auditory canal pressure in patients with vestibular schwannomas. J Neurosurg 96: 872-876
33. Satar B, Jackler RK, Oghalai J, Pitts LH, Yates PD (2002) Risk-benefit analysis of using the middle fossa approach for acoustic neuromas with > 10 mm cerebellopontine angle component. Laryngoscope 112: 1500-1506
34. Okubo T, Yoshioka N, Hayashi N, et al (2000) Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the cranial nerves in patients with acoustic schwannoma: correlation with surgical findings. Acta Otolaryngol [Suppl. 542]: 13-17