Evaluating the role of magnetic resonance imaging scans in the surgical management of acoustic neuromas

Laryngoscope

Volumn 110, Issue 7, 2000, Pages 1194-1197

  Hampton, Susanne M ^a   Adler, Julian ^b   Atlas, Marcus D ^c,d  

^a ROYAL VICTORIA HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b Sydney Imaging Group   (Australia)

^c ST VINCENT S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^d SIR CHARLES GAIRDNER HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

Acoustic neuroma; Fast spin echo; Magnetic resonance imaging

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC NEURINOMA; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TUMOR LOCALIZATION;

EID: 0033923047     PISSN: 0023852X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200007000-00024     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Jackler RK, Pitts LH. Selection of surgical approach to acoustic neuroma. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1992;25:361-387.
2. Haberkamp TJ, Meyer GA, Fox M. Surgical exposure of the fundus of the internal auditory canal: anatomic limits of the middle fossa versus the retrosigmoid transcanal approach. Laryngoscope 1998;108:1190-1194.
3. Blevins NH, Jackler RK. Exposure of the lateral extremity of the internal auditory canal through the retrosigmoid approach: a radioanatomic study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994;111(1):81-90.
4. Colletti V, Fiorino FG, Carner M, Tonoli G. Mechanisms of auditory impairment during acoustic neuroma surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;117:596-605.
5. Telischi FF, Lo WM, Arriaga MA, De la Cruz A. Lateral extent of internal auditory canal involvement by acoustic neuromas: a surgical-radiological correlation. Am J Otol 1993;14(5):446-450.
6. Matthies C, Madjid S, Krebs S. Management of vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): radiological features in 202 cases - their value for diagnosis and their predictive importance. Neurosurgery 1997;40(3):469-481.
7. Cohen NL, Hammerschlag P, Berg H, Ransohoff J. Acoustic neuroma surgery: an eclectic approach with emphasis on preservation of hearing. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1986; 95:21-27.
8. Atlas M, Fagan P. The value of hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma surgery. Aust J Otolaryngol 1993;1:223-225.
9. Slattery WH, Brackmann DE, Hitselberger W. Middle fossa approach for hearing preservation with acoustic neuromas. Am J Otol 1997;18(5):596-601.
10. Tatagiba M. Samii M, Matthies C, Al Azm M, Schonmayr R. The significance for post-operative hearing of preserving the labyrinthine acoustic neuroma surgery. J Neurosurg 1992;77:677-684.
11. Yokoyama T, Uemura K. Ryu H, Hinokuma K, Nishizawa S, Yamamoto S, Endo M, Sugiyama K. Surgical approach to the internal auditory meatus in acoustic neuroma surgery: significance of preoperative high resolution computed tomography. Neurosurgery 1996;39(5):965-969.
12. Thedinger BS, Whittacker K, Leutje CM. Recurrent acoustic tumour after suboccipital removal. Neurosurgery 1991;29: 681-687.
13. Kartush JM, Telian SA, Graham MD, Kemink JL. Anatomic basis for labyrinthine preservation during posterior fossa acoustic tumour surgery. Laryngoscope 1986;96: 1024-1028.
14. Arriaga MA, Chen DA, Fukushima T. Individualising hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma surgery. Laryngoscope 1997;107:1043-1047.