Enhancing academic performance in a classroom serving students with serious emotional disturbance: Interdependent group contingencies with randomly selected components

School Psychology Review

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 282-295

  Popkin, Joan ^a   Skinner, Christopher H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041572985     PISSN: 02796015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Baer, G. G., & Richards, H. C. (1980). An interdependent group-oriented contingency for improving academic performance. School Psychology Review, 9, 190-193.
2. Barlow, D. H., & Hersen, M. (1984). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change. New York: Pergamon Press.
3. Bos, C. B., Coleman, M., & Vaughn, S. (2002). Reading and students with E/BD: What do we know and recommend? In K. L. Lane, F. M. Gresham, & T. E. O'Shaughnessy (Eds.), Interventions for children with or at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 87-103). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
4. Bushnell, D., Wrobel, P. A., & Michaelis, M. L. (1968). Applying "group" contingencies to the classroom study behavior of preschool children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 55-61.
5. Cashwell, C. S., Skinner, C. H., Dunn, M., & Lewis, J. (1998). Group reward programs: A humanistic approach. Humanistic Education and Development, 37, 47-53.
6. Englemann, S. (1991). Is the three term contingency trial a predictor of effective instruction? Journal of Behavioral Education, 1, 337-354.
7. Freeland J. T., & Noell, G. H. (1999). Maintaining accurate math response in elementary students: The effects of delayed and intermittent reinforcement and programming common stimuli. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 52, 211-215.
8. Freeland J. T., & Noell, G. H. (2002). Programming for maintenance: An investigation of delayed and intermittent reinforcement and common stimuli to create indiscriminable contingencies. Journal of Behavioral Education, 11, 5-18.
9. Gickling, E., & Thompson, V. (1985). A personal view of curriculum-based assessment. Exceptional Children, 52, 205-218.
10. Greenwood, C. R., Delquadri, J. C., & Carta, J. J. (1997). Together we can! Classwide peer tutoring to improve basic academic skills. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
11. Gresham, F. M., & Gresham, G. N. (1982). Interdependent, dependent, and independent group contingencies for controlling disruptive behaviors. The Journal of Special Education, 16, 101-110.
12. Hall, R. V. (1991). Behavior analysis and education: An unfilled dream. Journal of Behavioral Education, 1, 305-316.
13. Hayes, L. A. (1976). The use of group contingencies for behavior control: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 638-648.
14. Jenson, W. R. (1978). Behavior modification in secondary schools: A review. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 11, 53-63.
15. Kelshaw-Levering, K., Sterling-Turner, H. E., Henry, J. R., & Skinner, C. H. (2000). Randomized interdependent group contingencies: Group reinforcement with a twist. Journal of School Psychology, 37, 523-534.
16. Litow, L., & Pumroy, D. K. (1975). A brief review of classroom group-oriented contingencies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 341-347.
17. Mace, F. C., McCurdy, B., & Quigley, E. A. (1990). The collateral effect of reward predicted by matching theory. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 197-205.
18. Moore, L. A., Waguespack, A. M., Wickstrom, K. F., Witt, J. C., & Gaydos, G. R. (1994). Mystery motivator: An effective and time efficient intervention. School Psychology Review, 23, 106-118.
19. Myerson, J., & Hale, S. (1984). Practical implications of the matching law. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17, 367-380.
20. Pigott, H. E., & Heggie, D. L. (1985). Interpreting the conflicting results of individual versus group contingencies in classrooms: Target behavior as a mediating variable. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 7, 1-15.
21. Rhodes, G., Jenson, W. R., & Reavis, H. K. (1992). The tough kid book: Practical classroom management strategies. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
22. Shapiro, E. S., & Goldberg, R. (1990). In vivo rating of treatment acceptability by children: Group side effects in group contingencies to improve spelling performance. Journal of School Psychology, 28, 233-250.
23. Skinner, C. H., Cashwell, C. S., & Dunn, M. (1996). Independent and interdependent group contingencies: Smoothing the rough waters. Special Services in the Schools, 12, 61-78.
24. Skinner, C. H., Skinner, C. P., Skinner, A. L., & Cashwell, T. H. (1999). Using interdependent contingencies with groups of students: Why the principal kissed a pig. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 804-818.
25. th ed., pp. 817-830). Washington, DC: The National Association of School Psychologists.
26. Slavin, R. E. (1987). Cooperative learning: Where behavioral and humanistic approaches to classroom management meet. The Elementary School Journal, 88, 29-37.
27. Slavin, R. E. (1991). Cooperative learning and group contingencies. Journal of Behavioral Education, 1, 105-115.
28. Speltz, M. L., Shimamura, J. W., & McReynolds, W. T. (1982). Procedural variations in group contingencies: Effects on children's academic and social behaviors. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 533-544.
29. Stage, S. A., & Quiroz, D. R. (1997). A meta-analysis of interventions to decrease disruptive behavior in public education settings. School Psychology Review, 26, 333-368.
30. Stewart, J. P., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1986). Effects of group and individual contingencies on reading performance with Native American junior high school students. Techniques: A Journal for Remedial Education and Counseling, 2, 133-144.
31. Stokes, T. F., & Baer, D. M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 349-367.
32. Sulzar-Azaroff, B., & Mayer, G. R. (1986). Achieving educational excellence: Using behavioral strategies. New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.
33. Sulzbacher, S. I., & Houser, J. E. (1968). A tactic to eliminate disruptive behaviors in the classroom: Group contingent consequences. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 73, 88-90.
34. Tennessee Division of Special Education. (1993). Special education manual: Tennessee Department of Special Education. Nashville, TN: The Division.
35. Theodore, L. A., Bray, M. A., Kehle, T. J., & Jenson, W. R. (2001). Randomization of group contingencies and reinforcers to reduce classroom disruptive behavior. Journal of School Psychology, 3, 279-284.
36. Turyco, T. L., & Elliott, S. N. (1990). Acceptability and effectiveness of group contingencies for improving spelling achievement. Journal of School Psychology, 28, 27-37.