Occupational issues of allergic contact dermatitis

International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health

Volumn 76, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 347-350

  Andersen, Klaus E ^a  

^a ODENSE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Allergic contact dermatitis; Contact allergy; Dermatotoxicity; Diagnostic tests; Epidemiology; Local lymph node assay; Occupational skin disease; Patch tests; Skin

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; CONTACT ALLERGEN; COSMETIC; INDUSTRIAL CHEMICAL; NICKEL;

CLINICAL TRIAL; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DRUG IDENTIFICATION; DRUG LABELING; HAZARDOUS WASTE; HOUSEHOLD; HUMAN; INDUSTRIAL AREA; LOCAL LYMPH NODE ASSAY; OCCUPATIONAL ECZEMA; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; OCCUPATIONAL SKIN DISEASE; PATCH TEST; PREVALENCE; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SKIN ALLERGY;

DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; DERMATITIS, OCCUPATIONAL; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, IMMUNOLOGIC; HUMANS; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; PATCH TESTS;

CAVIA PORCELLUS; SUS SCROFA;

EID: 0041464838     PISSN: 03400131     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00420-002-0420-7     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Adams RM (1999) Occupational Skin Disease, 3rd edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, USA
2. Agner T, Flyvholm MA, Menne T (1999) Formaldehyde allergy: A follow-up study. Am J Contact Dermat 10:12-17
3. Allenby CF, Basketter DA (1993) An arm immersion model of compromised skin. II. Influence on minimal eliciting patch test concentrations of nickel. Contact Dermatitis 28:129-133
4. Andersen KE (1998) Multicentre patch test studies: Are they worth the effort? Contact Dermatitis 38:222-223
5. Andersen KE, Rastogi SC, Carlsen L (1996) The allergen bank: A source of extra contact allergens for the dermatologist in practice. Acta Derm Venereol 76:136-140
6. Antoine JL, Lachapelle JM (1988) Variations in the quantities of petrolatum applied in patch testing. Derm Beruf Umwelt 36:191-194
7. Bruze M (2000) Principles of occupational hand eczema. In: Menné T, Maibach HI (eds) Hand Eczema, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 181-194
8. Danish National Board of Industrial Injuries (2000) Årsager til anerkendte erhvervsbetingede kontakteksemer. Nyt om arbejdsskader, 4, April 2000
9. Dean J, Twerdok LE, Andersen KE, Bailey P, Hamilton RG, Haseman J, Hatao J, Løvik M, Maibach HI, Meade BJ, Regal J, Smialowicz R, Thorne P, Ulrich SE (1999) The murine local lymph node assay: A test method for assessing the allergic contact dermatitis potential of chemicals/compounds. The results of an independent peer review evaluation coordinated by the interagency coordinating committee on the validation of alternative methods (ICCVAM) and the national toxicology program center for the evaluation of alternative toxicological methods (NICEATM) NIH Publication 1999, no. 99-4494.
10. Diepgen TL, Coenraads PJ (2000) The epidemiology of occupational contact dermatitis. In: Kanerva L, Elsner P, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Handbook of Occupational Dermatology. Springer, Berlin pp 3-16
11. Fischer T, Maibach HI (1984) Patch test allergens in petrolatum: A reappraisal. Contact Dermatitis 11:224-228
12. Flyvholm M-A, Andersen KE, Baranski B, Sarlo K (eds) (1997) Criteria for classification of skin- and airway-sensitizing substances in the work and general environments. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, EUR/ICP/EHPM 0502
13. Fregert S (1988) Physicochemical methods for detection of contact allergens. Dermatol Clin 6:97-104
14. Hindsén M, Bruze M, Christensen OB (1997) The significance of previous allergic contact dermatitis for elicitation of delayed hypersensitivity to nickel. Contact Dermatitis 37:101-106
15. Kanerva L, Estlander T, Jolanki R, Alanko K (2000a) False negative patch test reactions due to a lower concentration of patch test substance than declared. Contact Dermatitis 42:289-290
16. Kanerva L, Elsner P, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (2000b) Handbook of Occupational Dermatology. Springer, Berlin
17. Kristiansen J, Christensen JM, Henriksen T, Nielsen NH, Menné T (2000) Determination of nickel in fingernails and forearm skin (stratum corneum). Anal Chim Acta 403:265-272
18. Lachapelle JM (1997) A proposed relevance scoring system for positive allergic patch test reactions: Practical implications and limitations. Contact Dermatitis 36:39-43
19. Lidén C, Lundgren L, Skare L, Lidén G, Tornling G, Krantz S (1998) A new whole-body exposure chamber for human skin and lung challenge experiments - The generation of wheat flour aerosols. Ann Occup Hyg 42:541-547
20. Meding B (1990a) Epidemiology of hand eczema in an industrial city. Acta Derm Venereol [Suppl 153]
21. Meding B (1990b) Occupational hand eczema in an industrial city. Contact Dermatitis 22:13-23
22. Menné T, Calvin G (1993) Concentration threshold of non-occluded nickel exposure in nickel sensitive individuals and controls with and without surfactant. Contact Dermatitis 29:180-184
23. Menné T, Dooms-Goossens A, Wahlberg JE, White IR, Shaw S (1992) How large a proportion of contact sensitivities are diagnosed with the European standard series? Contact Dermatitis 26:201-202
24. Nielsen NH, Menne T, Kristiansen J, Christensen JM, Borg L, Poulsen LK (1999) Effects of repeated skin exposure to low nickel concentrations: A model for allergic contact dermatitis to nickel on the hands. Br J Dermatol 141:676-682
25. Rycroft RJG, Menné T, Frosch P, Lepoittevin JP (2001) Textbook of Contact Dermatitis, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin
26. Surakka J, Johnsson S, Rosén G, Lindh T, Fischer T (1999) A method for measuring dermal exposure to multifunctional acrylates. J Environ Monit 1:533-540
27. Van Hemmen JJ, Brouwer DH (1995) Assessment of dermal exposure to chemicals. Sci Total Environ 168:131-141
28. Wahlberg JE (2000) Prevention and rehabilitation. In: Kanerra L, Elsner P, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Handbook of Occupational Dermatology. Springer, Berlin, pp 412-416