Indestructibility, strongness, and level by level equivalence

Fundamenta Mathematicae

Volumn 177, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 45-54

  Apter, Arthur W ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Level by level equivalence between strong compactness and supercompactness; Strong cardinal; Strongly compact cardinal; Supercompact cardinal

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041411194     PISSN: 00162736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4064/fm177-1-3     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. A. Apter, Some remarks on indestructibility and Hamkins' lottery preparation, Arch. Math. Logic, to appear.
2. A. Apter and J. Cummings, Identity crises and strong compactness II: strong cardinals, Arch. Math. Logic 40 (2001), 25-38.
3. A. Apter and J. D. Hamkins, Indestructibility and the level-by-level agreement between strong compactness and supercompactness, J. Symbolic Logic 67 (2002), 820-840.
4. A. Apter and S. Shelah, On the strong equality between supercompactness and strong compactness, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 349 (1997), 103-128.
5. M. Gitik and S. Shelah, On certain indestructibility of strong cardinals and a question of Hajnal, Arch. Math. Logic 28 (1989), 35-42.
6. J. D. Hamkins, A generalized version of the Gap Forcing Theorem, in preparation.
7. _, Destruction or preservation as you like it, Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 91 (1998), 191-229.
8. _, Gap forcing, Israel J. Math. 125 (2001), 237-252.
9. _, Gap forcing: generalizing the Lévy-Solovay theorem, Bull. Symbolic Logic 5 (1999), 264-272.
10. _, The lottery preparation, Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 101 (2000), 103-146.
11. A. Kanamori, The Higher Infinite, Springer, Berlin, 1994.
12. J. Ketonen, Strong compactness and other cardinal sins, Ann. Math. Logic 5 (1972), 47-76.
13. R. Laver, Making the supercompactness of κ indestructible under κ-directed closed forcing, Israel J. Math. 29 (1978), 385-388.
14. A. Lévy and R. Solovay, Measurable cardinals and the continuum hypothesis, Israel J. Math. 5 (1967), 234-248.