Requirements determination: An information systems specialist perspective of process quality

Requirements Engineering

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 220-236

  Havelka, Douglas ^a  

^a MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Information systems; Project management; Requirements determination

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041364106     PISSN: 09473602     EISSN: 1432010X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/PL00010361     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Yadav SB. Determining an organization's information requirements: a state of the art survey. Data Base 1983;14(3):3-20
2. Yadav SB. Classifying an organization to identify its information requirements: a comprehensive framework. J Manage Inform Syst 1985;2(1):39-59
3. Chatzoglou PD, Soteriou AC. A DEA framework to assess the efficiency of the software requirements capture and analysis process. Decision Sci 1999;30(2):503-531
4. Ahituv N, Munro M, Wand Y. The value of information in information analysis. Inform Manage 1981;4(3):143-150
5. Grudnitski G. Eliciting decision-makers' information requirements: application of the Rep Test methodology. J Manage Inform Syst 1984;1(1):11-32
6. Moody JW, Blanton JE, Cheney PH. A theoretically grounded approach to assist memory recall during information requirements determination. J Manage Inform Syst 1998;15(1):79-98
7. Munro MC, Davis GB. Determining management information needs. MIS Quarterly 1977;1(2):55-67
8. Rockart JF. Chief executives define their own data needs. Harvard Business Rev 1979;March-April:81-93
9. Wetherbe JC. Executive information requirements: getting it right. MIS Quarterly 1991;15(1):51-65
10. Byrd TA, Cossick KL, Zmud RW. A synthesis of research on requirements analysis and knowledge acquisition techniques. MIS Quarterly 1992;16(1):117-138
11. Colter MA. A comparative analysis of systems analysis techniques. MIS Quarterly 1984;8(1):51-66
12. Taggart WM Jr, Tharp MO. A survey of information requirements analysis techniques, Comput Surveys 1977;9(4):273-290
13. Guinan PJ, Cooprider JG, Faraj S. Enabling software development team performance during requirements definition: a behavioral versus technical approach. Inform Syst Res 1998;9(2):101-125
14. Ocker R, Fjermestad J, Hiltz SR, Johnson K. Effects of modes of group communication on the outcome of software requirements determination. J Manage Inform Syst 1998;15(1):99-118
15. Agarwal R, Sinha AP, Tanniru M. Cognitive fit in requirements modeling: a study of object and process methodologies. J Manage Inform Syst 1996;13(2):137-162
16. Hunton JE. Involving information system users in defining system requirements: the influence of procedural justice perceptions on user attitudes and performance. Decision Sci 1996;27(4):647671
17. Vessey I, Conger S. Learning to specify information requirements: the relationship between application and methodology. J Manage Inform Syst 1993; 10(2):177-201
18. DeBrabander B, Edstrom A. Successful information systems development projects. Manage Sci 1977;24(2):191-199.
19. DeBrabander B, Thiers G. Successful information system development in relation to situational factors which affect effective communication between MIS-users and EDP-specialists. Manage Sci 1984;30(2):137-155
20. Cerrulo MJ. Information system success factors. J Syst Manage 1980;10-19
21. Juergens HF. Attributes of information system development. MIS Quarterly 1977;31-41
22. Scharer L. Pinpointing requirements. Datamation 1981; April:139-151
23. Ravichandran T, Rai A. Total quality management in information systems development: key constructs and relationships. J Manage Inform Syst 1999-2000;16(3):119-155
24. Delbecq AL, Van de Ven AH, Gustafson DH. Group techniques for program planning. Scott-Foresman, Glenview, IL, 1975
25. Delbecq AL, Van de Ven AH, Gustafson DH. Guidelines for conducting NGT meetings. In: Hampton DR, Summer CE, Webber RA (eds). Organizational behavior and the practice of management (4th edn). Scott, Foresman, Glenview, IL, 1982, pp 279-298
26. Sutton SG. Toward an understanding of the factors affecting audit quality. Decision Sci 1993;January-February:88-105
27. Sutton SG, Lampe JC. Monitoring quality in a knowledge-work environment: integrating structured group processes with decision support system design. Productivity Manage Frontiers 1989; (2):365-372
28. Van de Ven AH. Group decision-making effectiveness. Kent State University Center for Business and Economic Research Press, Kent, Ohio, USA, 1974
29. Van de Ven AH, Delbecq AF. Nominal versus interacting group processes for committee decision-making effectiveness, Acad Manage J 1971;14(2):203-212
30. Van de Ven AH, Delbecq AF. The effectiveness of nominal, Delphi, and interacting group decision making processes. Acad Manage J 1974;17(4):605-621
31. Aubrey CA, Eldridge LA. Banking on high quality. Quality Progress 1981;14(12):14-19
32. Sutton SG, Lampe JC. A framework for evaluating process quality for audit engagements. Accounting Business Res 1991;Summer:275-288
33. Theby S. Group productivity performance measurement McDonald Douglas Corporation CSW Productivity Council Measurement and Reporting Group, St Louis, MO, 1981
34. Hershauer JC, St Louis RD, Green GI. Measurement of systems development productivity. Technical Report 84-7, Arizona State University Decision Systems Research Center, Tempe, AZ, 1984
35. Hampton DR, Summer CE, Webber RA. Organizational behavior and the practice of management (4th edn). Scott, Foresman, Glenview, IL, 1982
36. Simon JL, Burstein P. Basic research methods in social science (3rd edn). Random House, New York, 1985
37. Conover WJ. Practical nonparametric statistics (2nd edn). Wiley, New York, 1980
38. Marakas GM, Elam J. Semantic structuring in analyst acquisition and representation of facts in requirements analysis. Inform Syst Res 1998;9(1):37-63
39. Stanley FJ. Establishing a project management methodology. J Inform Syst Manage 1988;5(4):15-24
40. Doll WJ, Torkzadeh G. The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction. MIS Quarterly 1988;12(2):259-274
41. Doll WJ, Torkzadeh G. A discrepancy model of end-user computing involvement. Manage Sci 1989;35(10):1151-1171
42. Doll WJ, Torkzadeh G. A congruence construct of user involvement. Decision Sci 1991; 22(2):443-453