Reproduction within and between generations: The example of nineteenth-century Britain

Historical Methods

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 4-15

  Prandy, Kenneth ^a   Bottero, Wendy ^b  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041029349     PISSN: 01615440     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01615440009598942     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bertaux, D., and I. Bertaux-Wiame. 1997. Heritage and its lineage: A case history of transmission and social mobility over five generations. In Pathways to social class, edited by D. Bertaux and P. Thompson, 62-97. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
2. Blackburn, R. M., and K. Prandy. 1997. The reproduction of social inequality. Sociology 31:491-509.
3. Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
4. Crossick, G. 1978. An artisan elite in Victorian society: Kentish London, 1840-1880. London: Croom Helm.
5. Delger, H., and J. Kok. 1998. Bridegrooms and biases: A critical look at the study of intergenerational mobility on the basis of marriage certificates. Historical Methods 31:113-21.
6. Foster, J. 1974. Class struggle and the Industrial Revolution. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
7. Glass, D. V. 1954. Social mobility in Britain. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
8. Goldthorpe, J. H. 1980. Social mobility and class structure in modern Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Gray, R. Q. 1976. The labour aristocracy in Victorian Edinburgh. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Kaelble, H. 1981. Historical research on social mobility: Western Europe and the USA in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. New York: Columbia University Press.
11. _. 1985. Social mobility in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries: Europe and America in comparative perspective. Leamington Spa, U.K.: Berg.
12. Laumann, E. O., and L. Guttman. 1966. The relative associational contiguity of occupations in an urban setting. American Sociological Review 31:169-78.
13. Lynch, K. 1998. Old and new research in historical patterns of social mobility. Historical Methods 31:93-98.
14. Matthews, J. N. S., et al. 1990. Analysis of serial measurements in medical research. British Medical Journal 300:230-35.
15. Miles, A. 1993. How open was nineteenth-century British society? Social mobility and equality of opportunity, 1839-1914. In Building European society: Occupational change and social mobility in Europe, edited by A. Miles and D. Vincent, 18-39. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
16. Mitch, D. 1993."Inequalities which everyone may remove": Occupational recruitment, endogamy, and the homogeneity of social origins in Victorian England. In Building European society: Occupational change and social mobility in Europe, edited by A. Miles and D. Vincent, 140-64. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
17. Morris, R. J. 1993. Fuller value, questions and contexts: Occupational coding and the historian. In The use of occupations in historical analysis, edited by K. Schurer and H. Diederiks, 5-27. St. Katharinen, Germany: Scripta Mercaturae Verlag.
18. Payne, G. 1987. Mobility and change in modern society. London: Macmillan.
19. Penn, R. 1985. Skilled workers in the class structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Prandy, K., and W. Bottero. 1995. The social analysis of stratification and mobility. Cambridge: Sociological Research Group (working paper no. 18).
21. _. 1998. The use of marriage data to measure the social order in nineteenth-century Britain. Sociological Research Online 3(1).
22. _. Forthcoming. Social reproduction and mobility in Britain and Ireland in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Sociology 33.
23. Stewart, A., K. Prandy, and R. M. Blackburn. 1980. Social stratification and occupations. London: Macmillan.
24. van Leeuwen, M., and I. Maas. 1996. Long-term social mobility: Research agenda and a case study (Berlin, 1825-1957). Continuity and Change 11:399-433.