Covariance structure analysis in experimental research: Comparing two word translation models

Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 491-503

  Van Hell, Janet G ^a   Oosterveld, Paul ^a   De Groot, Annette M B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041025534     PISSN: 07433808     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03200538     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. ALWIN, D. F., & TESSLER, R. C. (1985). Causal models, unobserved variables, and experimental data. In H. M. Blalock (Ed.), Causal models in panel and experimental designs (pp. 55-88). New York: Aldine.
2. BAGOZZI, R. P. (1977). Structural equation models in experimental research. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 209-226.
3. BENTLER, P. M. (1980). Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Causal modeling. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 419-456.
4. BENTLER, P. M. (1989). EQS structural equations program manual. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software.
5. BLALOCK, H. M. (1985). Causal models in panel and experimental designs. New York: Aldine.
6. BOLLEN, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
7. BOLLEN, K. A., & STINE, R. A. (1993). Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 111-135). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8. BROWN, R. L. (1986). A comparison of the LISREL and EQS programs for obtaining parameter estimates in confirmatory factor analysis studies. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 18, 382-388.
9. BURNAGE, G. (1990). CELEX: A guide for users. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: SSN.
10. DE GROOT, A. M. B. (1992). Determinants of word translation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 1001-1018.
11. DE GROOT, A. M. B., DANNENBURG, L., & VAN HELL, J. G. (1994). Forward and backward word translation by bilinguals. Journal of Memory & Language, 33, 600-629.
12. DE GROOT, A. M. B., & HOEKS, J. C. J. (1995). The development of bilingual memory: Evidence from word translation by trilinguals. Language Learning, 45, 683-724.
13. GERBING, D. W., & ANDERSON, J. C. (1993). Monte Carlo evaluations of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 40-65). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14. GORDON, B. (1985). Subjective frequency and the lexical decision latency function: Implications for mechanisms of lexical access. Journal of Memory & Language, 24, 631-645.
15. HAYS, W. L. (1963). Statistics. London: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
16. JÖRESKOG, K. G. (1993). Testing structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 294-316). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17. JÖRESKOG, K. G., & SÖRBOM, D. (1988). Lisrel 7: A guide to the program and applications [Computer program manual]. Chicago: SPSS.
18. KIRSNER, K., SMITH, M. C., LOCKHART, R. S., KING, M. L., & JAIN, M. (1984). The bilingual lexicon: Language-specific units in an integrated network. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 23, 519-539.
19. KROLL, J. F. (1993). Accessing conceptual representation for words in a second language. In R. Schreuder & B. Weltens (Eds.) The bilingual lexicon (pp. 53-81). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
20. KROLL, J. F., & SHOLL, A. (1992). Lexical and conceptual memory in fluent and nonfluent bilinguals. In R. J. Harris (Ed.), Cognitive processing in bilinguals (pp. 191-204). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
21. KROLL, J. F., & STEWART, E. (1990, November). Concept mediation in bilingual translation. Paper presented at the 31st annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans.
22. KROLL, J. F., & STEWART, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory & Language, 33, 149-174.
23. LA DU, T. J., & TANAKA, J. S. (1989). Influence of sample size, estimation method, and model specification on goodness-of-fit assessments in structural equation models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 625-635.
24. LA HEIJ, W., HOOGLANDER, A., KERLING, R., & VAN DER VELDEN, E. (in press). Nonverbal context effects in forward and backward word translation: Evidence for concept mediation. Journal of Memory & Language.
25. LOMAX, R. G. (1982). A guide to LISREL-type structural equation modeling. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 14, 1-8.
26. LOMAX, R. G. (1983). A guide to multiple-sampling structural equation modeling. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 15, 580-584.
27. LONG, J. S. (1983). Covariance structure models: An introduction to LISREL. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
28. MARSH, H. W., BALLA, J. R., & MCDONALD, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391-410.
29. ROYCE, J. R. (1977). Guest editorial: Have we lost sight of the original vision for SMEP and MBR? Multivariate Behavioral Research, 12, 135-141.
30. SÁNCHEZ-CASAS, R. M., DAVIS, C. W., & GARCIA-ALBEA, J. E. (1992). Bilingual lexical processing: Exploring the cognate/noncognate distinction. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4, 293-310.
31. TANAKA, J. S. (1987). "How big is big enough?": Sample size and goodness-of-fit in structural equation models with latent variables. Child Development, 58, 134-146.
32. TANAKA, J. S. (1993). Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 10-39). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
33. TANAKA, J. S., & HUBA, G. J. (1985). A fit index for covariance structure models under arbitrary GLS estimation. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 38, 197-201.