Assessment of the impact of the journal literature produced by Indian CSIR laboratories using subfield corrected impact

Scientometrics

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 81-92

  Srinivasan, R ^a   Raman, Vidyalakshmi ^a   Meyyappan, N ^a   Pichappan, P ^b  

^a CENTRAL ELECTROCHEMICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (India)

^b ANNAMALAI UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040964832     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02458479     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. A. T. BALABAN, How should citations to articles in high and low impact journals be evaluated, or what is a citation worth? Scientometrics, 37 (1996) 495-498.
2. A. F. J. VAN RAAN, (Ed.), Handbook of Quantitative Studies in Science and Technology, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1988.
3. R. TODOROV, W. GLÄNZEL, Journal citation measures: A concise review, Journal of Information Science, 14 (1988) 47-65.
4. E. GARFIELD, The impact factor, Current Contents, 26 (1994) 3-7.
5. G. DAVIES, P. ROYLE, A Comparison of Australian university output using journal impact factors, Scientometrics, 35 (1996) 45-58.
6. A. J. NEDERHOF, A. F. J. VAN RAAN, A validation study of bibliometric indicators: The comparative performance of cum laude doctorates in chemistry, Scientometrics, 17 (1989) 427-435.
7. H. F. MOED, TH. N. VAN LEEUWEN, Improving the accuracy of Institute for Scientific Information's journal impact factors, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46 (1995) 461-467.
8. T. BRAUN, W. GLÄNZEL, The sweet and sour of journal citation rates, The Chemical Intelligencer (Jan. 1995) 31-32.
9. P. O. SEGLEN, The skewness of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43 (1992) 628-638.
10. P. VINKLER, Bibliometric features of subfields, Scientometrics, 14 (1988) 454.
11. B. K. SEN, Normalised Impact Factor, Journal of Documentation, 48 (1992).
12. G. VAN HOOYDONCK, R. GEVAERT, G. MILLS-PROSST, H. VAN DE SOMPEL, K. DEBACKERE, A bibliotheconomic analysis of the impact factors of scientific disciplines, Scientometrics, 30 (1984) 65-81.
13. L. EGGHE, R. ROUSSEAU, Average and global impact factors of scientific disciplines, Scientometrics, 36 (1996) 97-107.
14. L. EGGHE, R. ROUSSEAU, Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data, Journal of Information Science, 22 (1996) 165-170.
15. R. ROUSSEAU, A scientometric study of the scientific publications of LUC: period 1981-1993. Report.
16. R. E. DE BRUIN, A. KINT, M. LUWEL, H. F. MOED, A study of research evaluation and planning: the university of Ghent, Research Evaluation, 3 (1993) 24-41.
17. P. PICHAPPAN, Identification of mainstream journals of science: A method using the discipline-contribution score, Scientometrics, 27 (1993) 199-213.
18. P. PICHAPPAN, N. K. KHATRI, An iterative approach in finding the core of information, Information Services & Use, (1995) 27-32.
19. R. MILLER, A. MANSEAU, Bibliometric indicators and the competitive environment of R&D laboratories, Scientometrics, 36 (1996) 421-433.
20. A. F. J. VAN RAAN, Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises, Scientometrics, 36 (1996) 397-420.