Bibliometric indicators and the competitive environment of R&D laboratories

Scientometrics

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 421-433

  Miller, R ^a   Manseau, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040527497     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02129603     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. A. J. BARBARIE, Evaluating federal R&D in Canada, in B. BOZEMAN, J. MELKERS (Eds), Evaluating R&D Impacts: Methods and Practice, Kluwer Academic Pub., 1993, pp. 155-162.
2. R. W. SCHMITT, The strategic measure of R&D, Research-Technology Management, 34, No. 6 (1991) 13-16.
3. F. ANDERSON, R DALPE, A profile of Canadian coal and petroleum research communities, Scientometrics, 25, No. 3 (1992) 447-463.
4. W. B. BROWN, D. GOBELI, Observation on the measurement of R&D productivity: A case study, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-39, No. 4 (1992) 325-331.
5. B. GOLD, Charting a course to superior technology evaluation, Sloan Management Review, (Fall 1988) 19-27.
6. G. S. SOUZA, E. R. CRUZ, T. R. CRUZ, The measurement and assessment of quality in agricultural research institutions, Scientometrics, 28, No. 2 (1993) 159-182.
7. P. H. ROSSI, H.E. FREEMAN, Evaluation: A Systematic Approach, Sage Pub. Newbury Park, 1989.
8. D. E. CHUBIN, "Grant Peer Review in Theory and Practice", Evaluation Review, Special Issue: Research Impact Assessment, R. N. KOSTOFF (Ed.), Vol. 18, No. 1, Feb. 1994, pp. 20-30.
9. R. SMITH, Problems with peer review and alternative, British Medical Journal, 296(6624) (1988) 774-777.
10. A. H. RUBENSTEIN, Managing Technology in the Decentralized Firm, Wiley, New York, 1989.
11. A. S. BEAN, Why some R&D organizations are more productive than others, Research-Technology Management, (Jan-Feb. 1995) 15-29.
12. Z. GRILICHES, Productivity puzzles and R&D: Another noexplanation, Journal of Economics Perspectives, 2, No. 4 (1988) 9-21.
13. G. K. MORBEY, R. M. REITHNER, How R&D affects sales growth, productivity and profitability, Research-Technology Management, 33, No. 3 (1990) 11-14.
14. B. NIXON et al., Industry and the City: Is R&D the key?, Accountancy, 111, No. 1193 (1993) 102.
15. W. S. BUSH, R. R. COLWELL, Communications and scientific productivity in the marine sciences, Research Evaluation, 1, No. 1 (1991) 11-19.
16. P. J. JAKES, Research evaluation in the US forest service: Opinions of research manager, Research Policy, No. 17 (1988) 283-292.
17. M. M. QURASHI, Dependence of publication-rate on size of some university groups and department in U.K., and Greece, in comparison with N.C.I., USA, Scientometrics, 27, No. 3 (1993) 19-29.
18. H.A. AVERCH, Policy Uses of Evaluation of Research Literature, Office of Technology Assessment (USA), Contractor Report, July 1990.
19. R. N. KOSTOFF, "Research Impact Assessment: Where Are We Now?", Internal Report, Office of Naval Research USA, March 1993.
20. R. MILLER, The influence of primary task on R&D laboratory evaluation: A comparative bibliometric analysis, R&D Management, 22, No.1 (1992) 3-20.
21. F. NARIN, Technology indicators and corporate planning, Review of Business, 14, No. 3 (Spring 1993) 19-23.
22. K. PAVITT, "The Technological Competencies of the World's Largest Firms", Conference 93. II. 18, Hydro-Quebec Chair in Management of Technology, Université du Québec in Montreal, Feb. 1993, 11 p.
23. A. N. LINK, Methods for evaluating the return on R&D investments, in: B. BOZEMAN, J. MELKERS (Eds), Evaluating R&D Impacts: Methods and Practice, Kluwer Academic Pub., 1993, pp. 1-16.
24. W. L. ROBB, Evaluating industrial R&D, Evaluation Review, 18, No. 1 (1994) 89-97.
25. R. MILLER, The new agenda for R&D: Strategy and integration, International Journal of Technology Management, 10, Nos 4/5/6 (1995) 511-524.
26. E. HELANDER, Evaluation activities in the Nordic countries, Scientometrics, 34, No. 3 (1995) 391-400.
27. W. KRULL, The Max Planck experience of evaluation, Scientometrics, 34, No. 3 (1995) 441-450.
28. W. A. SMITH, Evaluating research, technology and development in Canadian industry: Meeting the challenges of industrial innovation", Scientometrics, 34, No. 3 (1995) 527-539.