Actually, there's more to it than meets the eye

English Language and Linguistics

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 1-16

  Taglicht, Josef ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040362771     PISSN: 13606743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/s1360674301000119     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Aijmer, K. (1986). Why is actually so popular in spoken English? In Tottie, G. & I. Bäcklund (eds.), English in speech and writing. Studia Anglistica Upsaliensia 60: 119-29.
2. Blakemore, D. (1987). Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.
3. Bolinger, D. (1977). Meaning and form. London: Longman.
4. Borsley, R. D. (1996). Modern phrase structure grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
5. Clift, R. (1999). Grammar in interaction: the case of'actually'. Essex Research Projects in Linguistics 26: 1-53.
6. Greenbaum, S. (1969). Studies in English adverbial usage. London: Longman.
7. Halliday, M. A. K. & R. Hasan (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
8. Hickey, L. (1991). Surprise, surprise, but do so politely. Journal of Pragmatics 15: 367-72.
9. Huddleston, R. (1984) Introduction to the grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Keller, F. (1995). Towards an account of extraposition in HPSG. In Proceedings of the Seventh Meeting of the European ACL. 301-6.
11. Lenk, U. (1998). Marking discourse coherence: functions of discourse markers in spoken English. Tübingen: Günter Narr.
12. Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. McCawley, J. (1982). Parentheticals and discontinuous constituent structure. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 91-106.
14. McCawley, J. (1989). Individuation in and of syntactic structures. In Baltin, M. R. & A. S. Kroch (eds.), Alternative conceptions of phrase structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 117-38.
15. Oh, S.-Y. (2000). Actually and in fact in American English: a data-based analysis. English Language and Linguistics 4: 243-68.
16. Partridge, E. (1947). Usage and abusage. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin.
17. Pollard, C. & I. A. Sag (1994). Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Chicago: CSLI.
18. Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech & J. Svartvik (1972). A grammar of contemporary English. London: Longman.
19. Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech & J. Svartvik (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
20. Schwenter, S. A. & E. C. Traugott (2000). Invoking scalarity: the development of in fact. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1: 7-25.
21. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Smith, N. & D. Wilson (1979). Modern linguistics: the results of Chomsky's revolution. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
23. Svartvik, J. & R. Quirk (1980). A corpus of English conversation. Lund: Gleerup.
24. Taglicht, J. (1998). Constraints on intonational phrasing in English. Journal of Linguistics 34: 181-211.
25. Tognini-Bonelli, E. (1993). Interpretative nodes in discourse: actual and actually. In Baker, M., G. Francis & E. Tognini-Bonelli (eds.), Text and technology: in honour of John Sinclair. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 193-212.
26. Wilson, D. & D. Sperber (1993). Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua 90: 1-25.