Teaching intersubjectivity: Paradox and possibility

Smith College Studies in Social Work

Volumn 69, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 373-387

  Berzoff, Joan ^a   de Lourdes Mattei, María ^b  

^a SMITH COLLEGE   (United States)

^b HAMPSHIRE COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040163636     PISSN: 00377317     EISSN: 15530426     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00377319909517560     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Aron, L. (1992). Interpretation as an expression of the analyst’s subjectivity. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 2(4), 9-37.
2. Aron, L. (1996a). One person and two person psychologies and the method of psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 7,475-485.
3. Aron, L. (1996b). A meeting of the minds. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
4. Beebe, B., Lachman, F., & Jaffe, J. (1997). Mother infant interaction structures and presymbolic self and ego representations. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 7, 133-182.
5. Benjamin, J. (1988). The bonds of love: Psychoanalysis, feminism and the problem of domination. New York: Pantheon.
6. Benjamin, J. (1998). Shadow of the other: Intersubjectivity and gender in psychoanalysis. New York: Routledge.
7. Bion, W. R. (1963). Elements of psychoanalysis. London: Heineman Press.
8. Bollas, C. (1987). The shadow of the object: Psychoanalysis of the unthought known. New York: Columbia University Press.
9. Breuer, J., & Freud, S. (1996). Studies in hysteria. In J. Strachey (Ed. and Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1895.)
10. Burke, W. (1992). Countertransference disclosure and the asymmetry/mutuality dilemma. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 2(2), 241-271.
11. Burke, W., & Tansey, M. (1991). Countertransference disclosure and models of therapeutic action. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 37, 351-384.
12. Chodorow, N. (1978). The reproduction of mothering. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
13. Dunn, J. (1995). Intersubjectivity in psychoanalysis: A critical review. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 76, 723-738.
14. Ehrenberg, D. B. (1994). The intimate edge: Extending the reach of psychoanalytic interaction. New York: W.W. Norton. ■
15. Ferenczi, S. (1988). The clinical diary of Sandor Ferenczi, Ed., J. Dupont, trans. Michael Balint & N. Jackson. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. Foucault, M. (1984). The Foucault reader. (P. Rabinow, Ed.). New York: Pantheon.
17. Freud, S. (1958). On psychotherapy. In J. Strachey (Ed. and Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 7). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1905.)
18. Freud, S. (1960). The dynamics of transference. In J. Strachey (Ed. and Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 12, pp. 99-108). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1912.)
19. Freud, S. (1956). The future of an illusion. In J. Strachey (Ed. and Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 21, pp. 3-56). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1927.)
20. Gerson, S. (1996). Neutrality, resistance and self-disclosure in an intersubjective psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 6(5), 523-545.
21. Greenberg, J. (1995). Psychoanalytic technique and the interactive matrix. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, LXIV, 1-22.
22. Hoffman, I. Z. (1983). The patient as interpreter of the analyst’s experience. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 19, 389-422.
23. Hoffman, I. (1996). The intimate and ironic authority of the psychoanalysts presence. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, LXV, 12-135.
24. Klein, M. (1975). Envy and gratitude and other works. New York: Delacorte. (Original work published 1957.)
25. Levenson, E. (1996). Aspects of self-revelation and self-disclosure. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 32, 237-248.
26. Maroda, K. (1998). Why mutual analysis failed: The case of Ferenczi and RN. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 34(1), 115-132.
27. MacLaughlin, L. (1996). Power, authority and influence in the analytic dyad. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, TXV, 201-235.
28. Mitchell, S. (1997). Influence and autonomy in psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
29. Mitchell, S. (1998). The analyst’s knowledge and authority. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, LXVII, 1-31.
30. Ogden, T. (1979). On projective identification. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 60, 357-373.
31. Ogden, T. (1983). Projective identification and therapeutic technique. New York: Aronson Press.
32. Ogden, T. (1994). The analytic third: Working with intersubjective clinical facts. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 75, 3-19.
33. Renik, O. (1993). Analytic interaction: Conceptualizing technique in light of the analyst’s irreducible subjectivity. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, LXII, 553-571.
34. Rorty, R. (1991). Objectivity, relativism and truth. New York: Cambridge University Press.
35. Sterm, D. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36. Stolorow, R., Atwood, G., & Brandchaft, B. (1987). Psychoanalytic treatment: An intersubjective approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
37. Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: Norton.
38. Winnicott, D. W. (1986). Holding and interpretation. London: Hogarth Press.