Why mutual analysis failed: The case of ferenczi and rn

Contemporary Psychoanalysis

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 115-132

  Maroda, Karen ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032341525     PISSN: 00107530     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00107530.1998.10746351     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Aron, L. &Harris, A., eds. (1993). The legacy of Sandor Ferenczi. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press. t
2. Balint, M. (1968). The basic fault. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
3. Bollas, C. (1987). The shadow of the object: Psychoanalysis of the unthought known. New York: Columbia University Press.
4. DuPont, J. (1993). Michael Balint: Analysand, pupil, friend, and successor to Sandor Ferenczi. In: The legacy of Sandor Ferenczi, ed. L. Aron &A. Harris. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press, pp. 145-157.
5. Ferenczi, S, (1928). The elasticity of psycho-analytic technique. In: Final contributions to the problems and methods of psycho-analysis ed. J. Richman, trans. E. Mosbacher. London: Kamac Books, 1980, pp. 87-101.
6. Ferenczi, S. (1931). Child analysis in the analysis of adults. In: Final contributions to the problems and methods of psycho-analysis, ed. J. Richman, trans. E. Mosbacher. London: Kamac Books, 1980, pp. 126-142.
7. Ferenczi, S. (1988). The clinical diary of Sandor Ferenczi, ed. J. DuPont, trans. M. Balint &N. Jackson. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Fortune, C. (1993). The case of MRN”: Sandor Ferenczi’s radical experiment in psychoanalysis. In: The legacy of Sandor Ferenczi, ed. L, Aron &A. Harris. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press, pp. 101-120.
9. Frank, A. (1992). The therapeutic alliances of borderline patients. In: Borderline personality disorder: Clinical and empirical perspectives, ed. J. Clarkin, E. Marziali &H. Munroe-Blum. New York: Guilford, pp. 220-247.
10. Frankel, J. (1993). Collusion and intimacy in the analytic relationship. In: The legacy of Sandor Ferenczi, ed. L. Aron &A. Harris. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press, pp. 227-247.
11. Friedman, J. (1995). Ferenczi’s Clinical Diary. On loving and hating. International journal of Psycho-Analysis, 76:957-975.
12. Fromm-Reichmann, F. (1959). Psychoanalysis and psychotherapy: Selected papers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. Gabbard, G. (1994). Management of countertransference with borderline patients. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
14. Gedo, J. (1986). Ferenczi: Psychoanalysis’ first dissident. In: Conceptual issues in psychoanalysis: Essays in history and method. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press, pp. 36-50.
15. Greenberg, J. (1991). Countertransference and reality. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 1:52-73.
16. Greenberg, J. (1995). Self-disclosure: Is it psychoanalytic? Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 31:193-246.
17. Hoffer, A. (1993). Ferenczi’s relevance to contemporary psychoanalytic technique: Commentary on Andre Haynal’s “Ferenczi and the origins of psychoanalytic technique.” In: The legacy of Sandor Ferenczi, ed. L. Aron &A. Harris. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press, pp. 75-80.
18. Kohut, H. (1977). The restoration of the self New York: International Universities Press.
19. Levenson, E. (1996). Aspects of self-revelation and self-disclosure. Contemporary Psychoanalysis; 32:237-248.
20. Maroda, K. (1991). The power of countertransference. New York: John Wiley &Sons.
21. Mitchell, S. (1988). Relational concepts in psychoanalysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Newman, K. (1992). Abstinence, neutrality, gratification: New trends, new climates, new implications. The Annual of Psychoanalysis, 20:131-144. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
23. Searles, H. (1973). Concerning therapeutic symbiosis. The Annual of Psychoanalysis, 1:247-262. New York: International Universities Press.
24. Searles, H. (1975). The patient as therapist to his analyst. In: Tactics and techniques in psychotherapy, vol II, ed. P. Giovacchini-New York: Aronson, pp. 95-151.
25. Searles, H. (1979). Countertransference and related subjects. New York: International Universities Press.
26. Silverman, M. (1985). Countertransference and the myth of the perfectly analyzed analyst. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 54:175-199.
27. Stem, D. (1988). Not misusing empathy. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 24:598-609.
28. Stern, D. (1989). The analyst’s unformulated experience of the patient. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 25:1-33.
29. Stewart, H. (1993). Clinical aspects of malignant regression. In: The legacy of Sandor Ferenczi, ed. L. Aron &A. Harris. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press, pp. 249-264.
30. Terman, D. (1988). Optimum frustration: Structuralization and the therapeutic process. In: Learning from Kohut: Progress in self psychology, vol. 4, ed. A. Goldberg. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press, pp. 113-125.
31. Winnicott, D. (1949). Hate in the countertransference. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 30:69-74.
32. Winnicott, D. (1958). Masud Khan’s introduction to Through paediatrics to psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books.