Weaving mathematical instructional strategies into inclusive settings

Intervention in School and Clinic

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 206-215

  Karp, Karen S ^a   Voltz, Deborah L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039925209     PISSN: 10534512     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/105345120003500402     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Ball, D. L. (1992). Magical hopes: Manipulatives and the reform of math education. American Educator, 3, 14-18, 46-48.
2. Bjorklund, D. (Ed.). (1989). Children's thinking: Developmental function and individual differences. Pacific Grove, CA: Brookes/Cole.
3. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
4. Carnine, D. (1992). Expanding the notion of teachers' rights: Access to tools that work. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis: Monograph Number 7 - The Education Crisis: Issues, Perspectives, Solutions, 25, 1-2.
5. Cawley, J., & Reines, R. (1996). Mathematics as communication using the interactive unit. Teaching Exceptional Children, 28(2), 29-34.
6. Dewey, J. (1969). The school and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1899)
7. Driver, R. (1989). The construction of scientific knowledge. In R. Millar (Ed.), Doing science: Images of science in science education (pp. 83-106). Philadelphia: Falmer.
8. Englert, C. S., Tarrant, K. L., & Mariage, T. V. (1992). Defining and redefining instructional practice in special education: Perspectives on good teaching. Teacher Education and Special Education, 15, 62-86.
9. Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1996). Memo to constructivists: Skills count, too. Educational Leadership, 53(5), 26-29.
10. Harris K. R., & Pressley, M. (1991). The nature of cognitive strategy instruction: Interactive strategy construction. Exceptional Children, 57, 392-404.
11. Leinhardt, G., Putnam, R., Stein, M., & Baxter, J (1991). Where subject knowledge matters. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 2, pp. 87-113). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
12. Mercer, C. D., & Miller, S. P. (1992). Teaching students with learning problems in math to acquire, understand, and apply basic math facts. Remedial and Special Education, 13(3), 19-35, 61.
13. Myren, C. (1995). Posing open-ended questions in the primary classroom. San Leandro, CA: Teaching Resource Center.
14. Palincsar, A. S., Brown, A., & Campione, J. (1989, April). Discourse as a mechanism for acquiring process and knowledge. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
15. Pearson, P. D., & Gallagher, M. C. (1983). The instruction of reading comprehension. Educational Psychology, 8, 317-344.
16. Piaget, J. (1980). Opening the debate: The psychogenesis of knowledge and its epistemological significance, In M. Piattelli-Palmarini (Ed.), Language and learning (pp. 23-34). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17. Pressley, M., Woods, E., Woloshyn, V., Martin, V., King, A., & Menke, D. (1992). Encouraging mindful use of prior knowledge: Attempting to construct explanatory answers facilitates learning. Educational Psychologist, 27, 91-109.
18. Reid, D., & Stone, C. (1991). Why is cognitive instruction effective? Underlying learning mechanisms. Remedial and Special Education, 12(3), 8-19.
19. Resnick, L., & Klopfer, L. (Eds.). (1989). Toward the thinking curriculum: Current cognitive research. Baltimore: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
20. Shulman, L. (1986). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 3-36). New York: Macmillan.
21. Vaughn, S., Bos, C. S., & Schumm, J. S. (1997). Teaching mainstreamed, diverse, and at-risk students in the general education classroom. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.