How clinical social workers evaluate practice

Smith College Studies in Social Work

Volumn 71, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 419-439

  Drisko, James Winship ^a  

^a SMITH COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039770505     PISSN: 00377317     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00377310109517638     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Anastas, J. (March 1999). Realism: An epistemology to support the teaching of qualitative research. Paper presented at the annual program meeting of the Council for Social Work Education, San Francisco, CA.
2. Anastas, J., & MacDonald, M. (1994). Research design for social work and the human services. New York: Lexington Books.
3. Bloom, M., & Fischer, J. (1982). Evaluating practice: Guidelines for the accountable professional. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4. Blythe, B., & Briar, S. (1985). Developing empirically based models of practice. Social Work, 30(6), 483-488.
5. Briar, S. (1990). Empiricism in clinical practice: Present and future. In L. Videka-Sherman & W. Reid (Eds.), Advances in clinical social work research (pp. 1-7). Silver Spring, MD: NASW.
6. Burnette, D. (Ed.). (1998). Teaching qualitative research: A compendium of model syllabī. Alexandria, VA: Council on Social Work Education.
7. Dean, R. G. (1994). Commentary: A practitioner's perspective on qualitative single case evaluation. In E. Sherman & W. Reid (Eds.), Qualitative research in social work (pp. 279-284). New York: Columbia.
8. Drisko, J. (1997). Strengthening qualitative studies and reports: Standards to enhance academic integrity. Journal of Social Work Education, 33, 185-197.
9. Drisko, J. (1993). Personality and gender differences: Comparing clinicians and researchers. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 62(2), 147-162.
10. Edelson, M. (1992). Can psychotherapy research answer this psychotherapist's questions? Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 28(1), 118-151.
11. Elks, M., & Kirkhart, K. (1993). Evaluating effectiveness from the practitioner perspective. Social Work, 38(5), 554-563.
12. Elliot, R., & Anderson, C. (1994). Simplicity and complexity in psychotherapy research. In R. Russell (Ed.), Reassessing psychotherapy research (pp. 65-133). New York: Guilford.
13. Epstein, I., & Sainz, A. (January 1999). Using available clinical information in practice-based research: Strategies for data collection, analysis and interpretation. Paper presented at the Society for Social Work and Research Conference, Austin, TX.
14. Fischer, J. (1978). The revolution in social work. Social Work, 26, 199-207.
15. Franklin, C. (1999). Editorial. Research on practice: Better than you think? Social Work in Education, 21(1), 3-9.
16. Gilgun, J. (1994). A case for case studies in social work research. Social Work, 39, 371-380.
17. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.
18. Hepworth, D., Rooney, R., & Larsen, J. (1997). Direct social work practice. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks-Cole.
19. Hill, C. (1994). From an experimental to an exploratory naturalistic approach to studying psychotherapy process. In R. Russell (Ed.) Reassessing psychotherapy research (pp. 144-165). New York: Guilford.
20. Jordan, C., & Franklin, C. (1995). Clinical assessment for social workers: Quantitative and qualitative methods. Chicago: Lyceum.
21. Kazi, M. (1998). Practice research in England. Paper presented at the Society for Social Work and Research, Miami, FL.
22. Klein, W., & Bloom, M. (1995). Practice wisdom. Social Work, 40(6), 799-807.
23. Loneck, B., & Way, B. (1997). Using a focus group of clinicians to develop a research project on therapeutic process for clients with dual diagnoses. Social Work, 42(1), 107-111.
24. Meyer, C. (1996). My son the scientist. Social Work Research, 20(2), 101-104.
25. Miller, R. (1998). Practitioners as privilege evaluators of their own practice. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 69(1), 78-83.
26. Muhr, T. (1994). ATLAS/ti: Computer aided text interpretation and theory building [manual] (2nd ed.). Berlin: Author.
27. NASW. (1996). Code of Ethics. Washington, DC: Author.
28. Padgett, D. (1998). Does the glove really fit? Qualitative research and clinical social work practice. Social Work, 43(4), 373-381.
29. Penka, M. & Kirk, S. (1990). Practitioner involvement in clinical evaluation. Unpublished manuscript available from Dr. Kirk.
30. Pharis M. (1976). Ten reasons why I am not bothered by outcome studies which claim psychotherapy is ineffective. Clinical Social Work, 4(1), 58-60.
31. Reinherz, H., Regan, J., & Anastas, J. (1983). A research curriculum for future clinicians: A multimodel strategy. Journal of Education for Social Work, 19(2), 35-41.
32. Shaw, I., & Shaw, A. (1997). Game plans, buzzes and sheer luck: Doing well in social work. Social Work Research, 21, 69-79.
33. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34. Thyer, B. (1996). Forty years of progress toward empirical clinical practice? Social Work Research, 20(2), 77-82.
35. Ventimiglia, J., Marschke, J., Carmichael, P., & Loew, R. (2000). How do clinicians evaluate their practice effectiveness? A survey of clinical social workers. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 70(2), 287-306.
36. Videka-Sherman, L., & Reid, W. (1990). Time to take stock. In L. Videka-Sherman & W. Reid (Eds.), Advances in clinical social work research (pp. xi-xiii). Silver Spring, MD: NASW.
37. Wakefield, J., & Kirk, S. (1996). Unscientific thinking about scientific practice: Evaluating the scientist-practitioner model. Social Work Research, 20(2), 83-96.