Game plans, buzzes, and sheer luck: Doing well in social work

Social Work Research

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 69-79

  Shaw, Ian ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Evidence; Game plan; Practice evaluation; Strategies

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039174043     PISSN: 10705309     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/swr/21.2.69     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Altheide, D., & Johnson, J. (1994). Criteria for assessing interpretive validity in qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 485-499). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
2. Atkinson, P. (1995). Medical talk and medical work. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
3. Biestek, F. (1957). The casework relationship. Chicago: Loyola University Press.
4. Blythe, B., Tripodi, T., & Briar, S. (1995). Direct practice research in human service agencies. New York: Columbia University Press.
5. Bull, R., & Shaw, I. (1992). Constructing causal accounts in social work. Sociology, 26, 635-649.
6. Cook, T., Cooper, H., & Cordray, D. (Eds.). (1992). Metaanalysis for explanation. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
7. Einhorn, H., & Hogarth, R. (1986). Judging probable cause. Psychological Bulletin, 99(1), 3-19.
8. Elks, M., & Kirkhart, K. (1993). Evaluating effectiveness from the practitioner's perspective. Social Work, 38, 554-563.