Wetland vegetation monitoring in cootes paradise: Measuring the response to a fishway/carp barrier

Ecological Restoration

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 145-154

  Smith, Tyler ^a   Lundholm, Jeremy ^b   Simser, Len ^a  

^a Royal Botanical Gardens   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYPRINUS CARPIO;

EID: 0039740054     PISSN: 15434060     EISSN: 15434079     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Chow-Fraser, P., V. Lougheed, V. Le Thiec, B. Crosbie, L. Simser, and J. Lord. 1998. Long-term response of the biotic community to fluctuating water levels and changes in water quality in Cootes Paradise Marsh, a degraded coastal wetland of Lake Ontario. Wetlands Ecology and Management 6:19-42.
2. Chow-Fraser, P. and L. Lukasik. 1995. Cootes Paradise Marsh: Community participation in the restoration of a Great Lakes coastal wetland. Restoration and Management Notes 13(2):183-189.
3. Hahn, D. 1997. Passive Fishwaste Composting PCB Destruction Project. Ontario Ministry of Energy and Environment, Waste Reduction Branch, April 29, 1997. Memorandum on file at RBG.
4. Judd, W.W. 1950. Plants collected in the Dundas Marsh, Hamilton, Ont., 1946. Canadian Field-Naturalist 65:127-129.
5. Keddy, P.A. and A.A. Reznicek. 1986. Great Lakes vegetation dynamics: the role of fluctuating water levels and buried seeds. Journal of Great Lakes Research 12(1):25-36.
6. Lavender, B. 1987. Historical Geography of Cootes Paradise, Ontario. Senior Honours Thesis, Department of Geography, Faculty of Environmental Resource Studies, University of Waterloo. Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
7. Lougheed, V.L., B. Crosbie and P. Chow-Fraser. 1998. Predictions on the effect of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) exclusion on water quality, Zooplankton, and submergent macrophytes in a Great Lakes wetland. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55:1189-1197.
8. Lundholm, J.T. and W.L. Simser. 1999. Regeneration of submerged macrophyte populations in a disturbed Lake Ontario coastal marsh. Journal of Great Lakes Research 25 (2):395-400.
9. Painter, D.S., K.J. McCabe and W.L. Simser. 1989. Past and present limnological conditions in Cootes Paradise affecting aquatic vegetation. Royal Botanical Gardens Technical Bulletin No. 13. Hamilton, Ontario: Royal Botanical Gardens.
10. Pomfret, B. and J. Benkhuysen. 1993. Royal Botanical Gardens Ecology Department Progress Report 1993 Wildlife and Vegetation Monitoring Results. Unpublished report on file at Royal Botanical Gardens, Hamilton, Ontario.
11. Simser, W.L. 1982. Changes in the aquatic biota of Cootes Paradise marsh. Royal Botanical Gardens Technical Bulletin No. 12. Hamilton, Ontario: Royal Botanical Gardens.
12. Trotter, K., J.D. Hall and V. Cairns. 1998. Fish & wildlife habitat restoration project general information fact sheet. The fish & habitat restoration project. Hamilton, Ontario.
13. van der Valk, A.G. 1981. Succession in wetlands: A Gleasonian approach. Ecology 62(3): 688-696.
14. Van Horn, M. and K. Van Horn. 1996. Quantitative photomonitoring for restoration projects. Restoration and Management Notes 14(1):30-34.
15. Westcott, K., T.H. Whillans and M.G. Fox. 1997. Viability and abundance of seeds of submerged macrophytes in the sediment of disturbed and reference shoreline marshes in Lake Ontario. Canadian Journal of Botany 75:451-456.
16. Whillans, T.H. 1996. Historic and comparative perspectives on rehabilitation of marshes as habitat for fish in the lower Great Lakes basin. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53(Suppl. 1):58-66.
17. Wragg, L.E. 1949. The Muskrat in Southern Ontario. M.A. Thesis, University of Toronto. 148 pp.