Defining rules and roles in instructional contexts: A preliminary assessment of student perceptions

International Journal of Phytoremediation

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 403-412

  Shelton, Michael W ^a   Lane, Derek R ^a   Waldhart, Enid S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039586330     PISSN: 15226514     EISSN: 15497879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08824099909388742     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Cohen, J., 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20: 37-46.
2. Comadena, M. E., Semlak, W., and Escort, M. D., 1992. Communicator style and teacher effectiveness: Adult learners versus traditional undergraduate students. Communication Research Reports, 9: 57-63.
3. Comeaux, P., and Neer, M., 1995. A comparison of two instructional formats in the basic hybrid course on oral and test performance. The Southern Communication Journal, 60: 257-265.
4. Condon, J. C., 1986. “ The ethnocentric classroom ”. In Communicating in college classrooms, Edited by: Civikly, J. M., 11-20. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Cooper, P. J., Stewart, L. P., and Gudykunst, W. B., 1982. Relationship with instructor and other variables influencing student evaluations of instructor. Communication Quarterly, 30: 308-315.
6. Fleiss, J. L., 1971. Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, 76: 378-382.
7. Frey, L. R., Anderson, S., and Friedman, P. G., 1998. The status of instruction in qualitative communication research methods. Communication Education, 47: 246-260.
8. Galvin, K. M., 1999. “ Classroom roles of the teacher ”. In Teaching Communication: Theory, Research, and Methods, 2nd ed., Edited by: Vangelisti, A.L., Daly, J. A., and Friedrich, G. W., 243-255. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Hindess, B., 1973. The use of official statistics in sociology, London: Macmillan.
10. Johnson, G. M., Staton, A. Q., and Jorgensen-Earp, C. R., 1995. An ecological perspective on the tradition of new university freshmen. Communication Education, 44: 336-352.
11. Jorgensen-Earp, C. R., and Staton, A. Q., 1993. Student metaphors for the college freshman experience. Communication Education, 42: 123-141.
12. Kougl, K., 1997. Communicating in the classroom, Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
13. Lane, D. R., 1996. The Use of Permanent Learning Teams in Teaching Introductory Communication Courses: Assessing the Impact of Communication on Human Learning, Norman, OK: The University of Oklahoma. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation.
14. Lindsay, J. S., 1990. Classroom discourse analysis: A review of the literature with implications for educational evaluation. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 23: 107-116.
15. McKeachie, W. J., ed. 1999. Teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers., 10th ed., Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
16. Miller, W. L., and Crabtree, B. F., 1994. “ Clinical research ”. In Handbook of qualitative research, Edited by: Denzin, N. K., and Lincoln, G., 340-352. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Neer, M., 1987. The development of an instrument to measure classroom apprehension. Communication Education, 36: 154-166.
18. Nussbaum, J. F., and Scott, M. D., 1980. “ Student learning as a relational outcome of teacher-student interaction ”. In Communication Yearbook, Edited by: Nimmo, D., Vol. 4, 553-579. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.
19. Powell, R. G., and Arthur, R., 1985. Perceptions of affective communication and teaching effectiveness at different times in the semester. Communication Quarterly, 34: 254-261.
20. Richmond, V. P., and McCroskey, J. C., 1995. Communication apprehension, avoidance, and effectiveness., 4th ed., Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
21. Rosenfeld, L. B., 1983. Communication climate and coping mechanisms in the college classroom. Communication Education, 32: 157-174.
22. Scott, M. D., and Wheeless, L. R., 1977. “ Instructional communication theory and research: An overview ”. In Communication Yearbook, Edited by: Ruben, B. D., Vol. 1, 496-511. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.
23. Shelton, M. W., 1997. The meaning exercise: A focus on denotation and connotation. The Speech Communication Teacher, 12: 7
24. Shelton, M. W., Lane, D. R., and Waldhart, E. S., 1999. A review and assessment of national educational trends in communication instruction. Communication Education, 48: 228-237.
25. Shelton, M. W., and Waldhart, E. S., Classroom tensions: A rationale for ‘sculpting’ a new perspective on the communication classroom. Paper presented to the Southern States Communication Association. San Antonio, TX. April.
26. Shelton, M. W., and Waldhart, E. S., Dreams of fields: The basic communication course as an argument field. Paper presented to the National Communication Association. New York, NY. November.
27. Silverman, D. R., 1993. Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text, and interaction, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Stange, K. C., and Zyzarski, S. J., 1989. Integrating qualitative and quantitative research methods. Family Medicine, 21: 448-451.
29. Staton, A. Q., 1999. “ An ecological perspective on college/university teaching: The teaching/learning environment ”. In Teaching communication: Theory, research, and methods., 2nd ed., Edited by: Vangelisti, A.L., Daly, J. A., and Friedrich, G.W., 31-48. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. West, R., and Pearson, J. C., 1994. Antecedent and consequent conditions of student questioning: An analysis of classroom discourse across the university. Communication Education, 43: 299-311.