Achieving access to the general curriculum for students with mental retardation: A curriculum decision-making model

Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 327-342

  Wehmeyer, Michael L ^a   Lattin, Dana ^b   Agran, Martin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039567618     PISSN: 10793917     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Agran, M. (1997). Student-directed learning: Teaching self-determination skills. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/ Cole.
2. Agran, M., Alper, S., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2000). Access to the general curriculum for students with significant disabilities: What it means to teachers. Manuscript submitted for publication.
3. nd Ed., pp. 409-473). Denver: Love Publishing.
4. Committee on Appropriate Test Use (1999). High staken. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
5. Committee on Goals 2000 and the Inclusion of Students with Disabilities (1997). Educating one and all: Students with disabilities, and standards-based reform. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
6. Center for Applied Special Technology (1998-1999). The National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum [On-line]. Available: http://www.cast.org/ initiatives/natianal_center.html
7. nd Ed.). Denver: Love Publishing.
8. th Ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
9. Elliott, J. L., Erickson, R. N., Thurlow, M. L., & Shriner, J. G. (2000). State-level accountability for the performance of students with disabilities: Five years of change? The Journal of Special Education, 34, 39-47.
10. Federal Register (1999, March 12). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
11. Feldman, R., Saletsky, R., Sullivan, J., & Theiss, A. (1983). Student locus of control and response to expectations about self and teacher. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 27-32.
12. Field, S., Hoffman, A., & Spezia, M. (1999). Self-determination strategies for adolescents in transition. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
13. Field, S., Martin, J., Miller, R., Ward, M., & Wehmeyer, M. (1998). A practiced guide to teaching self-determination. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
14. Kavale, K. A., & Forness, S. R. (1999). Efficacy of special education and related services. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
15. Knowlton, E. (1998). Considerations in the design of personalized curricular supports for students with developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 33, 95-107.
16. Moon, M. S., Hart, D., Komissar, C., & Friedlander, R. (1995). Making sports and recreation activities accessible: Assistive technology and other accommodation strategies. In K. F. Flippo, K.J. Inge, & M. Barcus (Eds.), Assistive technology: A resource for school, work, and community (pp. 223-244). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
17. Orkwis, R., & McLane, K. (1998). A curriculum every student can use: Design principles for student access. ERIC/OSEP Topical Brief, Fall, 1998. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
18. Polloway, E. A., Patton, J. R., Epstein, M. H., & Smith, T. E. C. (1989). Comprehensive curriculum for students with mild handicaps. Focus on Exceptional Children, 27(8), 1-12.
19. Rolison, M. A., & Medway, F. J. (1985). Teachers' expectations and attributions for student achievement: Effects of label, performance pattern, and special education intervention. American Educational Research Journal, 22, 561-573.
20. Rosenthal-Malek, A., & Bloom, A. (1998). Beyond acquisition: Teaching generalization for students with developmental disabilities. In A. Hilton & R. Ringlaben (Eds.), Best and promising practices in developmental disabilities (pp. 139-155). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
21. Sands, D. J., Adams, L., & Stout, D. M. (1995). A statewide exploration of the nature and use of curriculum in special education. Exceptional Children, 62, 68-83.
22. Schunk, D. (1994). Self-regulation of self-efficacy and attributions. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 75-99). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23. Sykes, G., & Plastrik, P. (1993). Standards setting as educational reform. Eric Clearinghouse on Teacher Education, Trends and Issues Paper, No. 8. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
24. th Cong. (1995), http://www.ed.gov/ Speeches/06-1995/idea-1.html.
25. th Ed.). Denver: Love Publishing.
26. Wehmeyer, M. L. (1998). National survey of the use of assistive technology by adults with mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 36, 44-51.
27. Wehmeyer, M. L. (1999). Assistive technology and students with mental retardation: Utilization and barriers. Journal of Special Education Technology, 14, 50-60.
28. Wehmeyer, M. L., Agran, M., & Hughes, C. (1998). Promoting self-determination for students with disabilities: Basic skills for successful transition. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
29. Wehmeyer, M. L., Palmer, S., Agran, M., Mithaug, D., & Martin, J. (2000). Promoting causal agency: The Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction. Exceptional Children, 66, 439-453.
30. Whitman, T. L. (1990). Self-regulation and mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 94, 347-362.
31. Zimmerman, M. A. (1990). Toward a theory of learned hopefulness: A structural model analysis of participation and empowerment. Journal of Research in Personality, 24, 71-86.