The phonology of epenthetic stops: Implications for the phonetics-phonology interface in optimality theory

Linguistics

Volumn 40, Issue 377, 2002, Pages 1-27

  Warner, Natasha ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039490188     PISSN: 00243949     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/ling.2002.004     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Alderete, John (1997). Dissimilation as local conjunction. In Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 27, Kiyomi Kusumoto (ed.), 17-31. Montreal: McGill University.
2. Ali, Latif; Daniloff, Ray; and Hammarberg, Robert (1979). Intrusive stops in nasal-fricative clusters: an aerodynamic and acoustic investigation. Phonetica 36, 85-97.
3. Anderson, Stephen R (1976). Nasal consonants and the internal structure of segments. Language 52, 326-344.
4. Anttila, Arto (1997). Deriving variation from grammar. In Variation, Change and Phonological Theory, Frans Hinskens et al. (eds.), 35-68. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
5. _; and Cho, Young-mee Yu (1998). Variation and change in optimality theory. Lingua 104, 31-56.
6. Barnitz, John G. (1974). Bloom-p-field, Chom-p-sky, and phonetic epen-t-thesis. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 4(2), 1-13.
7. Blankenship, Barbara (1992). What TIMIT can tell us about epenthesis. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 81, 17-25.
8. Boersma, Paul (1998). Functional phonology: formalizing the interactions between articulatory and perceptual drives. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Amsterdam. (LOT dissertation series 11.)
9. Booij, Geert (1995). The Phonology of Dutch. Oxford: Clarendon.
10. Clements, G. Nick (1987). Phonological feature representation and the description of intrusive stops. In Parasession on Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology, A. Bosch et al. (eds.), 29-51. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
11. Cohn, Abigail C. (1998). The phonetics-phonology interface revisited: where's phonetics? In Texas Linguistic Forum 41: Exploring the Boundaries Between Phonetics and Phonology, Amanda R. Doran et al. (eds.), 25-40. Austin: Department of Linguistics, University of Texas at Austin.
12. Flemming, Edward (1995). Auditory representations in phonology. Unpublished dissertation, UCLA.
13. _(i.p.). Scalar and categorical phenomena in a unified model of phonetics and phonology. Phonology.
14. Fourakis, Marios; and Port, Robert (1986). Stop epenthesis in English. Journal of Phonetics 14, 197-221.
15. Gussenhoven, Carlos (1998). Can phonological constraints and phonetic constraints appear in the same grammar? Handout, CNRS-LOT Phonology Workshop, Nijmegen, 28-29 October.
16. _; and Jacobs, Haike (1998). Understanding Phonology. London: Arnold.
17. Guy. Gregory (1997). Competence, performance, and the generative grammar of variation. In Variation, Change and Phonological Theory, Frans Hinskens et al. (eds.), 125-143. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
18. Kingston, John; and Diehl, Randy L. (1994). Phonetic knowledge. Language 70(2), 419-454.
19. Kirchner, Robert (1997). Contrastiveness and faithfulness. Phonology 14, 83-111.
20. Lombardi, Linda (1998a). Coronal epenthesis and markedness. Unpublished manuscript, Rutgers Optimality Archive #245-0298.
21. _(1998b). Restrictions on direction of voicing assimilation. Unpublished manuscript, Rutgers Optimality Archive #246-0298.
22. McCarthy, John; and Prince, Alan (1995). Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. Unpublished manuscript, Rutgers Optimality Archive #60-0000.
23. Myers, Scott (1995). Expressing phonetic naturalness in phonology. In Derivations and Constraints in Phonology, Iggy Roca (ed.), 125-152. Oxford: Clarendon.
24. Nagy, Naomi; and Reynolds, Bill (1997). Optimality theory and variable word-final deletion in Faetar. Language Variation and Change 9, 37-55.
25. Ohala, John J. (1975). Phonetic explanations for nasal sound patterns. In Nasalfest: Papers from a Symposium on Nasals and Nasalization, C. A. Ferguson, Larry M. Hyman, and John J. Ohala (eds.), 289-316. Stanford: Language Universals Project.
26. _(1995). A probable case of clicks influencing the sound patterns of some European languages. Phonetica 52, 160-170.
27. _(1997). Emergent stops: diachronic and phonetic data. In Proceedings of the Seoul International Conference on Linguistics, 84-91. Seoul: Linguistic Society of Korea.
28. _(i.p.). Emergent obstruents: diachronic and phonetic data. In Studies in Sound Change, Didier Demolin and M. Dominicy (eds.). Amsterdam: Benjamms.
29. Pater, Joe (1996). Austronesian nasal substitution and other NC effects. In The Prosody Morphology Interface, Rene Kager et al. (eds.), 310-343. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Pierrehumbert, Janet (1994). Knowledge of variation. In Papers from the 30th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Parasession on Variation in Linguistic Theory, Katharine Beals et al. (eds.), 232-451. Chicago: CLS.
31. Piggott, Glyne L.; and Singh, Rajendra (1985). The phonology of epenthetic segments. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 30, 415-451.
32. Silverman, Daniel (1996). Voiceless nasals in auditory phonology. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Jan Johnson et al. (eds.), 364-374. Berkeley: BLS.
33. Smolensky, Paul (1995). On the internal structure of the constraint component Con of UG. Handout, UCLA, April 7. Rutgers Optimaliry Archive #86-0000.
34. Sproat, Richard; and Fujimura, Osamu (1993). Allophonic variation in English /1/ and its implications for phonetic implementation. Journal of Phonetics 21, 291-311.
35. Steriade, Donca (2001). The phonology of perceptibility effects: the P-map and its consequences for constraint organization. Unpublished manuscript, UCLA. http://www.linguistics.ucla.edu/people/steriade/steriade.htm.
36. Warner, Natasha; and Weber, Andrea (2001). Perception of epenthetic stops. Journal of Phonetics 29, 53-87.
37. Wetzels, W. Leo (1985). The historical phonology of intrusive stops: a non-linear description. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 30, 285-333.