Perception of epenthetic stops

Journal of Phonetics

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 53-87

  Warner, Natasha ^a,b   Weber, Andrea ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039326093     PISSN: 00954470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jpho.2001.0129     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ali L., Daniloff R., Hammarberg R. Intrusive stops in nasal-fricative clusters: an aerodynamic and acoustic investigation. Phonetica. 36:1979;85-97.
2. Anderson S. R. Nasal consonants and the internal structure of segments. Language. 52:1976;326-344.
3. Baayen H., Piepenbrock R., Rijn H. van. The CELEX Lexical database (CD-ROM). 1993;Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
4. Barnitz J. G. Bloom-p-field, Chom-p-sky, and phonetic epen-t-thesis. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences. 4:1974;1-13.
5. Blankenship B. What TIMIT can tell us about epenthesis. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics. 81:1992;17-25.
6. Booij G. The phonology of Dutch. 1995;Clarendon Press, Oxford.
7. Clements G. N. Phonological feature representation and the description of intrusive stops. Proceedings of the parasession on autosegmental and metrical phonology. 1987;Chicago Linguistic Society. p. 29-51.
8. Collins B., Mees J. The sounds of English and Dutch. 1981;Leiden University Press, The Hague.
9. Connine C. M., Titone D. Phoneme monitoring. Grosjean F., Frauenfelder U. H. A guide to spoken word recognition paradigms. 1997;635-645 Psychology Press, Hove.
10. Cutler A. The comparative perspective on spoken-language processing. Speech Communication. 21:1997;3-15.
11. Cutler A. The recognition of spoken words with variable representations. Proceedings of the workshop sound patterns of spontaneous speech. 1998;83-92.
12. Cutler A., Dahan D., Donselaar W. van. Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: a literature review. Language and Speech. 40:1997;141-201.
13. Cutler A., Otake T. Assimilation of place in Japanese and Dutch. Proceedings of the international conference on spoken language processing. 1998.
14. Donselaar W. van, Kuijpers C., Cutler A. Facilitatory effects of vowel epenthesis on word processing in Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language. 41:1999;59-77.
15. Dupoux E., Kakehi K., Hirose Y., Pallier C., Mehler J. Epenthetic vowels in Japanese: a perceptual illusion? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 25:1999;1568-1578.
16. Fourakis M., Port R. Stop epenthesis in English. Journal of Phonetics. 14:1986;197-221.
17. Frauenfelder U. H., Segui J. Phoneme monitoring and lexical processing: evidence for associative context effects. Memory & Cognition. 17:1989;134-140.
18. Fujimura O., Macchi M. J., Streeter L. A. Perception of stop consonants with conflicting transitional cues: a cross-linguistic study. Language and Speech. 21:1978;337-346.
19. Gaskell M. G., Marslen-Wilson W. D. Phonological variation and inference in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 22:1996;144-158.
20. Hume E., Johnson K., Seo M., Tserdanelis G. A cross-linguistic study of stop place perception. Proceedings of the international congress of phonetic sciences. 1999;2069-2072.
21. Jun J. Place assimilation as the result of conflicting perceptual and articulatory constraints. Camacho J., Choueiri L., Watanabe M. The proceedings of the 14th West Coast conference on formal linguistics. 1996;221-237 CSLI, Stanford.
22. Kakehi K., Kato K., Kashino M. Phoneme/syllable perception and the temporal structure of speech. Otake T., Cutler A. Phonological structure and language processing. 1996;126-143 Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.
23. Keyser S. J., Stevens K. N. Feature geometry and the vocal tract. Phonology. 11:1994;207-236.
24. Kuijpers, C. Donselaar, W. van. Phonological variation and phoneme identification in Dutch.
25. Lisker L. Perceiving final voiceless stops without release: effects of preceding monophthongs versus nonmonophthongs. Phonetica. 56:1999;44-55.
26. Marslen-Wilson W. D., Nix A., Gaskell M. G. Phonological variation in lexical access: abstractness, inference and English place assimilation. Language and Cognitive Processes. 10:1998;285-308.
27. Murray R. W. On epenthesis. Folia Linguistica. 23:1967;293-316.
28. Norušis M. J. SPSS professional statistics 6.1. 1994;SPSS Inc. Chicago.
29. Ohala J. Experimental historical phonology. Anderson J. M., Jones C. Historical linguistics. 1974;353-389 North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.
30. Ohala J. J. A probable case of clicks influencing the sound patterns of some European languages. Phonetica. 52:1995;160-170.
31. Ohala J. J. Emergent stops: diachronic and phonetic data. Proceedings of Seoul international conference on linguistics. 1997;Linguistic Society of Korea, Seoul. p. 84-91.
32. Otake T., Yoneyama K., Cutler A., van der Lugt A. The representation of Japanese moraic nasals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 100:1996;3831-3842.
33. Picard M. On the general properties of consonant epenthesis. Canadian Journal of Linguistics. 32:1987;133-142.
34. Picard M. Consonant epenthesis as a regular sound change. Diachronica. 6:1989;223-236.
35. Piggott G. L., Singh R. The phonology of epenthetic segments. Canadian Journal of Linguistics. 30:1985;415-451.
36. Stevens K. N. Acoustic phonetics. 1998;MIT Press, Cambridge.
37. Weber, A. Help or hindrance: how violation of different assimilation rules affects spoken-language processing, Language and Speech.
38. Wetzels W. L. The historical phonology of intrusive stops: a non-linear description. Canadian Journal of Linguistics. 30:1985;285-333.