Toward a single-cell account for binocular disparity tuning: An energy model may be hiding in your dendrites

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems

Volumn , Issue , 1998, Pages 208-214

  Mel, Bartlett W ^a   Ruderman, Daniel L ^b   Archie, Kevin A ^c  

^a Department of Biomedical Engineering University of Southern California ^*  (United States)

^b SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINOCULARS; CELLS; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS;

BINOCULAR DISPARITY; BIOPHYSICAL MODEL; HIERARCHICAL MODEL; NONLINEAR INTERACTIONS; PREFERRED ORIENTATIONS; RECEPTIVE FIELDS; VISUAL CORTEXES; VISUAL-PROCESSING;

CYTOLOGY;

EID: 0039194534     PISSN: 10495258     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Adelson, E., & Bergen, J. (1985). Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. J. Opt. Soc. Amer., A 2, 284-299.
2. Hines, M. (1989). A program for simulation of nerve equations with branching geometries. Int. J. Biomed. Comput., 24 55-68.
3. Hubel, D., & Wiesel, T. (1962). Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J. Physiol, 160, 106-154.
4. Koch, C., & Poggio, T. (1987). Biophysics of computation: Neurons, synapses, and membranes. In Edelman, G., Gall, W., k Cowan, W. (Eds.), Synaptic function, pp. 637-697. Wiley, New York.
5. Mel, B. (1992a). The clusteron: Toward a simple abstraction for a complex neuron. In Moody, J., Hanson, S., & Lippmann, R. (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 4, PP- 35-42. Morgan Kaufmann, Sari Mateo, CA.
6. Mel, B. (1992b). NMDA-based pattern discrimination in a modeled cortical neuron. Neural Computation, 4, 502-516.
7. Mel, B. (1993). Synaptic integration in an excitable dendritic tree. J. Neurophysiol, 70(3), 1086-1101.
8. Mel, B., Ruderman, D., & Archie, K. (1997). Complex-cell responses derived from center-surround inputs: The surprising power of intradendritic computation. In Mozer, M., Jordan, M., & Petsche, T. (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 9, pp. 83-89. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
9. Movshon, J., Thompson, I., & Tolhurst, D. (1978). Receptive field organization of complex cells in the cat's striate cortex. J. Physiol, 283, 79-99.
10. Nishihara, H., & Poggio, T. (1984). Stereo vision for robotics. In Brady, & Paul (Eds.), Proceedings of the First International Symposium of Robotics Research, pp. 489-505. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
11. Ohzawa, I., DeAngelis, G., & Freeman, R. (1990). Stereoscopic depth discrimination in the visual cortex: Neurons ideally suited as disparity detectors. Science, 249, 1037-1041.
12. Ohzawa, I., DeAngelis, G., & Freeman, R. (1997). Encoding of binocular disparity by complex cells in the cat's visual cortex. J. Neurophysiol, June.
13. Orban, G. (1984). Neuronal operations in the visual cortex. Springer Verlag, New York.
14. Pettigrew, J., Nikara, T., & Bishop, P. (1968). Responses to moving slits by single units in cat striate cortex. Exp. Brain Res., 6, 373-390.
15. Pollen, D., & Ronner, S. (1983). Visual cortical neurons as localized spatial frequency filters. IEEE Trans. Sys. Man Cybern., 13, 907-916.
16. Stuart, G., & Sakmann, B. (1994). Active propagation of somatic action potentials into neocortical pyramidal cell dendrites. Nature, 367, 69-72.