메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn , Issue 119, 2000, Pages 123-131

No: Poor farmers won't reap the benefits

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 0039177973     PISSN: 00157228     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1149536     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (6)

References (17)
  • 1
    • 0003851345 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Ithaca: Comstock Publishing Associates/Cornell University Press
    • Gordon Conway's The Doubly Green Revolution (Ithaca: Comstock Publishing Associates/Cornell University Press, 1997) offers a balanced and well-researched evaluation of both the benefits and shortcomings of the Green Revolution and argues that future efforts to increase food production in the developing world must also safeguard the environment. Two articles that examine the role biotechnology can play in the next Green Revolution are Ismail Serageldin's "Biotechnology and Food Security in the 21st Century" (Science, July 16, 1999) and Charles Mann's "Crop Scientists Seek a New Revolution" (Science, January 15, 1999). Mae-Wan Ho offers a critical assessment of biotechnology in Genetic Engineering: Dream or Nightmare? The Brave New World of Science and Business (Bath: Gateway Books, 1998). Readers can find a review of the book in the Winter 1998-99 issue of FOREIGN POLICY.
    • (1997) The Doubly Green Revolution
    • Conway, G.1
  • 2
    • 0033575393 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Biotechnology and food security in the 21st century
    • July 16
    • Gordon Conway's The Doubly Green Revolution (Ithaca: Comstock Publishing Associates/Cornell University Press, 1997) offers a balanced and well-researched evaluation of both the benefits and shortcomings of the Green Revolution and argues that future efforts to increase food production in the developing world must also safeguard the environment. Two articles that examine the role biotechnology can play in the next Green Revolution are Ismail Serageldin's "Biotechnology and Food Security in the 21st Century" (Science, July 16, 1999) and Charles Mann's "Crop Scientists Seek a New Revolution" (Science, January 15, 1999). Mae-Wan Ho offers a critical assessment of biotechnology in Genetic Engineering: Dream or Nightmare? The Brave New World of Science and Business (Bath: Gateway Books, 1998). Readers can find a review of the book in the Winter 1998-99 issue of FOREIGN POLICY.
    • (1999) Science
    • Serageldin, I.1
  • 3
    • 0033555954 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Crop scientists seek a new revolution
    • January 15
    • Gordon Conway's The Doubly Green Revolution (Ithaca: Comstock Publishing Associates/Cornell University Press, 1997) offers a balanced and well-researched evaluation of both the benefits and shortcomings of the Green Revolution and argues that future efforts to increase food production in the developing world must also safeguard the environment. Two articles that examine the role biotechnology can play in the next Green Revolution are Ismail Serageldin's "Biotechnology and Food Security in the 21st Century" (Science, July 16, 1999) and Charles Mann's "Crop Scientists Seek a New Revolution" (Science, January 15, 1999). Mae-Wan Ho offers a critical assessment of biotechnology in Genetic Engineering: Dream or Nightmare? The Brave New World of Science and Business (Bath: Gateway Books, 1998). Readers can find a review of the book in the Winter 1998-99 issue of FOREIGN POLICY.
    • (1999) Science
    • Mann, C.1
  • 4
    • 0006759872 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Bath: Gateway Books
    • Gordon Conway's The Doubly Green Revolution (Ithaca: Comstock Publishing Associates/Cornell University Press, 1997) offers a balanced and well-researched evaluation of both the benefits and shortcomings of the Green Revolution and argues that future efforts to increase food production in the developing world must also safeguard the environment. Two articles that examine the role biotechnology can play in the next Green Revolution are Ismail Serageldin's "Biotechnology and Food Security in the 21st Century" (Science, July 16, 1999) and Charles Mann's "Crop Scientists Seek a New Revolution" (Science, January 15, 1999). Mae-Wan Ho offers a critical assessment of biotechnology in Genetic Engineering: Dream or Nightmare? The Brave New World of Science and Business (Bath: Gateway Books, 1998). Readers can find a review of the book in the Winter 1998-99 issue of FOREIGN POLICY.
    • (1998) Genetic Engineering: Dream or Nightmare? The Brave New World of Science and Business
    • Ho, M.-W.1
  • 5
    • 0003699745 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Washington: CGIAR
    • One of the best overviews of the global debate over whether genetically modified crops can feed the developing world comes from the proceedings of an October 1999 conference convened by the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) and the U.S. National Academy of Sciences: Agricultural Biotechnology and the Poor (Washington: CGIAR, 2000). The volume's most noteworthy papers include: "Feeding the Developing World in the Next Millennium: A Question of Science?" by Andrew F. McCalla and Lynn R. Brown, "Genetically Modified Crops and Other Organisms: Implications for Agricultural Sustainability and Biodiversity" by Brian Johnson, "Ethical Challenges of Agricultural Biotechnology for Developing Countries" by Klaus M. Leisinger, and "Intellectual Property Protection: Who Needs It?" by David L. Richer. There are also several papers that pro" vide perspectives on biotechnology from countries in Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East.
    • (2000) Agricultural Biotechnology and the Poor
  • 6
    • 0041120899 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • One of the best overviews of the global debate over whether genetically modified crops can feed the developing world comes from the proceedings of an October 1999 conference convened by the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) and the U.S. National Academy of Sciences: Agricultural Biotechnology and the Poor (Washington: CGIAR, 2000). The volume's most noteworthy papers include: "Feeding the Developing World in the Next Millennium: A Question of Science?" by Andrew F. McCalla and Lynn R. Brown, "Genetically Modified Crops and Other Organisms: Implications for Agricultural Sustainability and Biodiversity" by Brian Johnson, "Ethical Challenges of Agricultural Biotechnology for Developing Countries" by Klaus M. Leisinger, and "Intellectual Property Protection: Who Needs It?" by David L. Richer. There are also several papers that pro" vide perspectives on biotechnology from countries in Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East.
    • Feeding the Developing World in the Next Millennium: A Question of Science?
    • McCalla, A.F.1    Brown, L.R.2
  • 7
    • 0039341764 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • One of the best overviews of the global debate over whether genetically modified crops can feed the developing world comes from the proceedings of an October 1999 conference convened by the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) and the U.S. National Academy of Sciences: Agricultural Biotechnology and the Poor (Washington: CGIAR, 2000). The volume's most noteworthy papers include: "Feeding the Developing World in the Next Millennium: A Question of Science?" by Andrew F. McCalla and Lynn R. Brown, "Genetically Modified Crops and Other Organisms: Implications for Agricultural Sustainability and Biodiversity" by Brian Johnson, "Ethical Challenges of Agricultural Biotechnology for Developing Countries" by Klaus M. Leisinger, and "Intellectual Property Protection: Who Needs It?" by David L. Richer. There are also several papers that pro" vide perspectives on biotechnology from countries in Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East.
    • Genetically Modified Crops and Other Organisms: Implications for Agricultural Sustainability and Biodiversity
    • Johnson, B.1
  • 8
    • 0041120898 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • One of the best overviews of the global debate over whether genetically modified crops can feed the developing world comes from the proceedings of an October 1999 conference convened by the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) and the U.S. National Academy of Sciences: Agricultural Biotechnology and the Poor (Washington: CGIAR, 2000). The volume's most noteworthy papers include: "Feeding the Developing World in the Next Millennium: A Question of Science?" by Andrew F. McCalla and Lynn R. Brown, "Genetically Modified Crops and Other Organisms: Implications for Agricultural Sustainability and Biodiversity" by Brian Johnson, "Ethical Challenges of Agricultural Biotechnology for Developing Countries" by Klaus M. Leisinger, and "Intellectual Property Protection: Who Needs It?" by David L. Richer. There are also several papers that pro" vide perspectives on biotechnology from countries in Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East.
    • Ethical Challenges of Agricultural Biotechnology for Developing Countries
    • Leisinger, K.M.1
  • 9
    • 0039934013 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • One of the best overviews of the global debate over whether genetically modified crops can feed the developing world comes from the proceedings of an October 1999 conference convened by the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) and the U.S. National Academy of Sciences: Agricultural Biotechnology and the Poor (Washington: CGIAR, 2000). The volume's most noteworthy papers include: "Feeding the Developing World in the Next Millennium: A Question of Science?" by Andrew F. McCalla and Lynn R. Brown, "Genetically Modified Crops and Other Organisms: Implications for Agricultural Sustainability and Biodiversity" by Brian Johnson, "Ethical Challenges of Agricultural Biotechnology for Developing Countries" by Klaus M. Leisinger, and "Intellectual Property Protection: Who Needs It?" by David L. Richer. There are also several papers that pro" vide perspectives on biotechnology from countries in Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East.
    • Intellectual Property Protection: Who Needs It?
    • Richer, D.L.1
  • 10
    • 0002229596 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The pharmageddon riddle
    • April 10
    • In "The Pharmageddon Riddle" (The New Yorker, April 10, 2000), Michael Specter examines how the backlash against genetically modified foods has impacted biotech corporate giant Monsanto. In "A Removeable Feast" (Foreign Affairs, May/June 2000), C. Ford Runge and Benjamin Senauer argue that current trade barriers threaten food security throughout the developing world.
    • (2000) The New Yorker
    • Specter, M.1
  • 11
    • 0008388377 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A removeable feast
    • May/June
    • In "The Pharmageddon Riddle" (The New Yorker, April 10, 2000), Michael Specter examines how the backlash against genetically modified foods has impacted biotech corporate giant Monsanto. In "A Removeable Feast" (Foreign Affairs, May/June 2000), C. Ford Runge and Benjamin Senauer argue that current trade barriers threaten food security throughout the developing world.
    • (2000) Foreign Affairs
    • Runge, C.F.1    Senauer, B.2
  • 12
    • 0002527775 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Ten reasons why biotechnology will not ensure food security, protect the environment, and reduce poverty in the developing world
    • Summer/Fall
    • The World Wide Web provides a wealth of information on biotechnology. The Summer/Fall 1999 issue of the quarterly online magazine AgBioFourm was the venue for a lively debate including "Ten Reasons Why Biotechnology Will Not Ensure Food Security, Protect the Environment, and Reduce Poverty in the Developing World" by Miguel A. Altieri and Peter Rosset and "Ten Reasons Why Biotechnology Will Be Important to the Developing World" by Martina McGloughlin. Many excellent publications on agricultural development and biotechnology can be downloaded from the Web site of CGIAR'S International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), such as "World Food Prospects: Critical Issues for the Early Twenty-First Century" by Per Pinstrup-Andersen, Rajul Pandya-Lorch, and Mark W. Rosegrant (Washington: IFPRI, 2020 Vision Food Policy Report, 1999), as well as a series of issue briefs titled Biotechnology for Developing-Country Agriculture: Problems and Opportunities, Gabrielle J. Persley, ed. (Washington: IFPRI, 2020 Vision Focus 2 Briefs, 1999). A very brief but useful overview of the environmental degradation now taking place in the developing world can be found in Food in the 21st Century: From Science to Sustainable Agriculture, by Mahendra Shah and Maurice Strong (Washington: CGIAR, 1999). Anti-biotech activists have launched a series of Web sites, such as the Greenpeace True Food Campaign and Biodevastation 2000. The biotech industry has responded with its own Web site, the Council for Biotechnology Information.
    • (1999) AgBioFourm
    • Altieri, M.A.1    Rosset, P.2
  • 13
    • 0000400324 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Ten reasons why biotechnology will be important to the developing world
    • Summer/Fall
    • The World Wide Web provides a wealth of information on biotechnology. The Summer/Fall 1999 issue of the quarterly online magazine AgBioFourm was the venue for a lively debate including "Ten Reasons Why Biotechnology Will Not Ensure Food Security, Protect the Environment, and Reduce Poverty in the Developing World" by Miguel A. Altieri and Peter Rosset and "Ten Reasons Why Biotechnology Will Be Important to the Developing World" by Martina McGloughlin. Many excellent publications on agricultural development and biotechnology can be downloaded from the Web site of CGIAR'S International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), such as "World Food Prospects: Critical Issues for the Early Twenty-First Century" by Per Pinstrup-Andersen, Rajul Pandya-Lorch, and Mark W. Rosegrant (Washington: IFPRI, 2020 Vision Food Policy Report, 1999), as well as a series of issue briefs titled Biotechnology for Developing-Country Agriculture: Problems and Opportunities, Gabrielle J. Persley, ed. (Washington: IFPRI, 2020 Vision Focus 2 Briefs, 1999). A very brief but useful overview of the environmental degradation now taking place in the developing world can be found in Food in the 21st Century: From Science to Sustainable Agriculture, by Mahendra Shah and Maurice Strong (Washington: CGIAR, 1999). Anti-biotech activists have launched a series of Web sites, such as the Greenpeace True Food Campaign and Biodevastation 2000. The biotech industry has responded with its own Web site, the Council for Biotechnology Information.
    • (1999) AgBioFourm
    • McGloughlin, M.1
  • 14
    • 0003417712 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Washington: IFPRI, 2020 Vision Food Policy Report
    • The World Wide Web provides a wealth of information on biotechnology. The Summer/Fall 1999 issue of the quarterly online magazine AgBioFourm was the venue for a lively debate including "Ten Reasons Why Biotechnology Will Not Ensure Food Security, Protect the Environment, and Reduce Poverty in the Developing World" by Miguel A. Altieri and Peter Rosset and "Ten Reasons Why Biotechnology Will Be Important to the Developing World" by Martina McGloughlin. Many excellent publications on agricultural development and biotechnology can be downloaded from the Web site of CGIAR'S International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), such as "World Food Prospects: Critical Issues for the Early Twenty-First Century" by Per Pinstrup-Andersen, Rajul Pandya-Lorch, and Mark W. Rosegrant (Washington: IFPRI, 2020 Vision Food Policy Report, 1999), as well as a series of issue briefs titled Biotechnology for Developing-Country Agriculture: Problems and Opportunities, Gabrielle J. Persley, ed. (Washington: IFPRI, 2020 Vision Focus 2 Briefs, 1999). A very brief but useful overview of the environmental degradation now taking place in the developing world can be found in Food in the 21st Century: From Science to Sustainable Agriculture, by Mahendra Shah and Maurice Strong (Washington: CGIAR, 1999). Anti-biotech activists have launched a series of Web sites, such as the Greenpeace True Food Campaign and Biodevastation 2000. The biotech industry has responded with its own Web site, the Council for Biotechnology Information.
    • (1999) World Food Prospects: Critical Issues for the Early Twenty-First Century
    • Pinstrup-Andersen, P.1    Pandya-Lorch, R.2    Rosegrant, M.W.3
  • 15
    • 0003847667 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Washington: IFPRI, 2020 Vision Focus 2 Briefs
    • The World Wide Web provides a wealth of information on biotechnology. The Summer/Fall 1999 issue of the quarterly online magazine AgBioFourm was the venue for a lively debate including "Ten Reasons Why Biotechnology Will Not Ensure Food Security, Protect the Environment, and Reduce Poverty in the Developing World" by Miguel A. Altieri and Peter Rosset and "Ten Reasons Why Biotechnology Will Be Important to the Developing World" by Martina McGloughlin. Many excellent publications on agricultural development and biotechnology can be downloaded from the Web site of CGIAR'S International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), such as "World Food Prospects: Critical Issues for the Early Twenty-First Century" by Per Pinstrup-Andersen, Rajul Pandya-Lorch, and Mark W. Rosegrant (Washington: IFPRI, 2020 Vision Food Policy Report, 1999), as well as a series of issue briefs titled Biotechnology for Developing-Country Agriculture: Problems and Opportunities, Gabrielle J. Persley, ed. (Washington: IFPRI, 2020 Vision Focus 2 Briefs, 1999). A very brief but useful overview of the environmental degradation now taking place in the developing world can be found in Food in the 21st Century: From Science to Sustainable Agriculture, by Mahendra Shah and Maurice Strong (Washington: CGIAR, 1999). Anti-biotech activists have launched a series of Web sites, such as the Greenpeace True Food Campaign and Biodevastation 2000. The biotech industry has responded with its own Web site, the Council for Biotechnology Information.
    • (1999) Biotechnology for Developing-Country Agriculture: Problems and Opportunities
    • Persley, G.J.1
  • 16
    • 0003832097 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Washington: CGIAR
    • The World Wide Web provides a wealth of information on biotechnology. The Summer/Fall 1999 issue of the quarterly online magazine AgBioFourm was the venue for a lively debate including "Ten Reasons Why Biotechnology Will Not Ensure Food Security, Protect the Environment, and Reduce Poverty in the Developing World" by Miguel A. Altieri and Peter Rosset and "Ten Reasons Why Biotechnology Will Be Important to the Developing World" by Martina McGloughlin. Many excellent publications on agricultural development and biotechnology can be downloaded from the Web site of CGIAR'S International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), such as "World Food Prospects: Critical Issues for the Early Twenty-First Century" by Per Pinstrup-Andersen, Rajul Pandya-Lorch, and Mark W. Rosegrant (Washington: IFPRI, 2020 Vision Food Policy Report, 1999), as well as a series of issue briefs titled Biotechnology for Developing-Country Agriculture: Problems and Opportunities, Gabrielle J. Persley, ed. (Washington: IFPRI, 2020 Vision Focus 2 Briefs, 1999). A very brief but useful overview of the environmental degradation now taking place in the developing world can be found in Food in the 21st Century: From Science to Sustainable Agriculture, by Mahendra Shah and Maurice Strong (Washington: CGIAR, 1999). Anti-biotech activists have launched a series of Web sites, such as the Greenpeace True Food Campaign and Biodevastation 2000. The biotech industry has responded with its own Web site, the Council for Biotechnology Information.
    • (1999) Food in the 21st Century: From Science to Sustainable Agriculture
    • Shah, M.1    Strong, M.2
  • 17
    • 0039934012 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • For links to these and other Web sites, as well as a comprehensive index of related FOREIGN POLICY articles, access
    • For links to these and other Web sites, as well as a comprehensive index of related FOREIGN POLICY articles, access www.foreignpolicy.com.


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.