Optimal unconditional test in 2×2 multinomial trials

Computational Statistics and Data Analysis

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 311-321

  Andrés, Martín ^a   García, Tapia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Association in 2 2 tables; Barnard's unconditional test; Contingency tables; Double dichotomy; Independence in 2 2 tables; Power* 2 2 tables

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039172654     PISSN: 01679473     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-9473(99)00015-8     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Barnard G.A. Significance tests for. 2 × 2 tables Biometrika. 34:1947;123-138.
2. Camilli G., Hopkins K.D. Testing for association in. 2 × 2 contingency tables with very small samples sizes Psychological Bull. 86(5):1979;1011-1014.
3. Fisher R.A. The logic of inductive inference. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. A. 98:1935;39-54.
4. Haber M. A modified exact test for. 2 × 2 contingency tables Biometrical J. 28(4):1986;455-463.
5. Haber M. A comparison of some conditional and unconditional exact tests for. 2 × 2 contingency tables Comm. Statist. Simulation. 16(4):1987;999-1013.
6. Hirji K.F., Tan S.J., Elashoff R.M. A quasi-exact test for comparing two binomial proportions. Statist. Med. 10:1991;1137-1153.
7. Kroll N.E.A. Testing independence in. 2 × 2 contingency tables J. Educational Statist. 14(1):1989;47-79.
8. Martín Andrés A. A review of classic non-asymptotic methods for comparing two proportions by means of independent samples. Comm. Statist. Simulation Comput. 20(2 & 3):1991;551-583.
9. Martín Andrés A., Herranz Tejedor I. Is Fisher's exact test very conservative? Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 19:1995;579-591.
10. Martín Andrés, A., Luna del Castillo, J.D., 1990. P -value for the optimal version of Fisher's exact test in the comparison of two independent proportions. Biometrical J. 32(2), 213-227. Corrections in Biometrical J. 32 (8), 1018 (1990).
11. Martín Andrés, A., Luna del Castillo, J.D., 1990. P -value for the optimal version of Fisher's exact test in the comparison of two independent proportions. Biometrical J. 32(2), 213-227. Corrections in Biometrical J. 32 (8), 1018 (1990).
12. Martín Andrés A., Silva Mato A. Choosing the optimal unconditioned test for comparing two independent proportions. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 17:1994;555-574.
13. Martín Andrés A., Tapia García J.M. On determining the. P -value in 2 × 2 multinomial trials J. Statist. Plann. Inference. 69(1):1998;33-49.
14. Martín Andrés A., Sánchez Quevedo M.J., Silva Mato A. Fisher's mid-. p -value arrangement in 2 × 2 comparative trials Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 29(1):1998;107-115.
15. Pirie W.R., Hamdan M.A. Some revised continuity corrections for discrete distributions. Biometrics. 28:1972;693-701.
16. Rice W.R. A new probability model for determining exact. p -values for 2 × 2 contingency tables when comparing binomial proportions Biometrics. 44:1988;1-22.
17. Sahai H., Khurshid A. On analysis of epidemiological data involving a. 2 × 2 contingency table: an overview of Fisher's exact test and Yates' correction for continuity J. Biopharmaceutical Statist. 5(1):1995;43-70.
18. Shuster, J.J., 1992. Exact unconditional tables for significance testing in the 2× 2 multinomial trial. Statist. Med. 11 (7), 913-922 Correction in 11, 1619 (1992).
19. Shuster, J.J., 1992. Exact unconditional tables for significance testing in the 2× 2 multinomial trial. Statist. Med. 11 (7), 913-922 Correction in 11, 1619 (1992).