On determining the P-value in 2×2 multinomial trials

Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 33-49

  Andrés, A Martín ^a   García, J M Tapia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

2 tables; 2 ; Barnard's test; Contingency tables; Double dichotomy; Independence test in 2 ; Unconditional tests

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032091212     PISSN: 03783758     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3758(97)00153-5     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Barnard, G.A., 1947. Significance tests for 2 × 2 tables. Biometrika 34, 123-138.
2. Camilli, G., Hopkins, K.D., 1979. Testing for association in 2 × 2 contingency tables with very small samples sizes. Psychol. Bull. 86 (5), 1011-1014.
3. Davis, L.J., 1986. Exact tests for 2 × 2 contingency tables. Amer. Statist. 40 (2), 139-141.
4. Fisher, R.A., 1935. The logic of inductive inference. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. A 98, 39-54.
5. Fisher, R.A., 1942. The Design of Experiment, Ch. 2, 3rd ed. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.
6. Haber, M., 1986. A modified exact test for 2 × 2 contingency tables. Biometrical J. 28 (4), 455-463.
7. Haber, M., 1987. A comparison of some conditional and unconditional exact tests for 2 × 2 contingency tables. Comm. Statist. Simulation 16 (4), 999-1013.
8. Kroll, N.E.A., 1989. Testing independence in 2 × 2 contingency tables. J. Ed. Statist. 14 (1), 47-79.
9. Lancaster, H.O., 1952. Statistical control of counting experiment. Biometrika 39, 419-422.
10. Lehmann, E.L., 1994. Testing Statistical Hypotheses. Chapman & Hall, New York.
11. Martin, A.A., 1991. A review of classic non-asymptotic methods for comparing two proportions by means of independent samples. Comm. Statist. Simulation Comput 20 (2 and 3), 551-583.
12. Martin, A.A. Silva, M.A., 1994. Choosing the optimal unconditioned test for comparing two independent proportions. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 17, 555-574.
13. McDonald, L.L., Davis, B.M., Milliken, G.A., 1977. A non-randomized unconditional test for comparing two proportions in a 2 × 2 contingency table. Technometrics 19, 145-150.
14. Pirie, W.R., Hamdan, M.A., 1972. Some revised continuity corrections for discrete distributions. Biometrics 28, 693-701.
15. Sahai, H., Khurshid, A., 1995. On analysis of epidemiological data involving a 2 × 2 contingency table: an overview of Fisher's exact test and Yates' correction for continuity. J. Biopharm. Statist. 5 (1), 43-70.
16. Shuster, J.J., 1992. Exact unconditional tables for significance testing in the 2 × 2 multinomial trial. Statist. Med. 11 (7), 913-922. Correction in 11, 1619.
17. Silva, M.A., Martin, A.A., 1997. Simplifying the calculation of the P-value for Barnard's test and its derivatives. Statist. Comput. 7, 137-143.
18. Suissa, S., Shuster, J.J., 1985. Exact unconditional samples sizes for the 2 × 2 binomial trial. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. A 148 (4), 317-327.
19. Yates, F., 1984. Test of significance for 2 × 2 contingency tables. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. A 147 (3), 426-463.