The gender inclusiveness of a women's history curriculum in secondary education

Women's Studies International Forum

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 61-75

  Ten Dam, Geert ^a   Hanneke, Farkas Teekens ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039164834     PISSN: 02775395     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0277-5395(96)00065-9     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Baxter Magolda, Marcia. (1992). Knowing and reasoning in college. Gender-related patterns in students' intellectual development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
2. Belenky, Mary, Clinchy, Blythe, Goldberger, Nancy, & Tarule, Jill. (1986). Women's ways of knowing. The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.
3. Busato, Vittorio, ten Dam, Geert, van den Eeden, Pieter, & Terwel, Jan. (1995). Gender-related effects of cooperative learning in a mathematics curriculum for 12 to 16 year-olds. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 26, 667-686.
4. Chodorow, Nancy. (1978). The reproduction of mothering. Berkeley: University of California Press.
5. Collins, Pat Hill. (1989). The social construction of black feminist thought. Signs, 14(4), 745-773.
6. Grever, Maria. (1991). Pivoting the center. Women's history as a compulsory examination subject in all Dutch secondary schools in 1990-1991. Gender & History, 3, 65-81.
7. Janssen, Jacques, den Hart, J., den Draak, Chr. (1989). Praying practices. The Journal of Empirical Theology, 2(2), 28-39.
8. Klein, Renate. (1987). The dynamics of the women's studies classroom: a review essay of the teaching practice of women's studies in higher education. Women's Studies International Forum, 10(2), 187-206.
9. Kramarae, Cheris, & Treichler, Paula. (1990). Power relationships in the classroom. In S.L. Gabriel & I. Smithson (Eds.), Gender in the classroom. Power and pedagogy (pp. 41-59). Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
10. Rosser, Sue. (1989). Teaching techniques to attract women to science: applications of feminist theories and methodologies. Women's Studies International Forum, 12(3), 363-377.
11. Rosser, Sue. (1990). Female friendly science. Applying women's studies methods and theories to attract students. New York: Pergamon Press.
12. Scott, Joan. (1988). Deconstructing equality versus difference: or, the uses of poststructuralist theory for feminism. Feminist Studies, 14(1), 33-50.
13. Severiens, Sabine, & ten Dam, Geert. (1994). Gender differences in learning styles: A narrative review and a quantitative meta-analysis. Higher Education, 27, 487-501.
14. te Poel, Yolanda. (1982), Meisjes van het huishoudonderwijs: hun belevingswereld en socialisatie. [Girls from home economics secondary education: their experiences and socialization] In E. Diekerhof (Ed.), Leren, wat moet je ermee? (pp. 79-98). Muiderberg: Countinho.
15. ten Dam, Geert, Hanneke, Farkas Teekens, & van Loosbroek, Tineke. (1991). Leerverschillen tussen meisjes en jongens. Effecten van vrouwengeschiedenis in het voortgezet onderwijs. [Learning differences between girls and boys. The effects of women's history in secondary education.] Amsterdam: Algemene Hogeschool Amsterdam, Pedagogiek Publikatie, no. 2.
16. ten Dam, Geert, & Rijkschroeff, Rally. (1996). Teaching women's history in secondary education. Constructing gender identity. Theory and Research in Social Education, 24, 71-89.
17. ten Dam, Geert, & Volman, Monique. (1995). Feminist research and educational policy. Journal of Education Policy, 10(2), 209-220.
18. Turkle, Sherry. (1984). The second self, computers and the human spirit. New York: Simon & Schuster.
19. Turkle, Sherry. (1988). Computentional reticence: why women fear the intimate machine. In: C. Kramarae (Ed.), Technology and women's voices (pp. 41-61). New York/London: Routledge.
20. Volman, Monique, ten Dam, Geert, & van Eck, Edith. (1993). Girls in the Educational Research Discourse. Comenius, 13(2), 196-217.