Teaching women’s history in secondary education: Constructing gender identity

Theory and Research in Social Education

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 71-88

  Dam, Geert ten ^a   Rijkschroeff, Rally ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b Verwey Jonker Institute   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84982176064     PISSN: 00933104     EISSN: 21631654     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00933104.1996.10505770     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Beetsma, J., (1989). Geschiedeniswerkplaats. Examenboek Havo/vwo. [secondary education history examination book] Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.
2. Davies, B. (1989a). The discursive production of the male/female dualism in school settings. Oxford Review of Education, 15(3), 229-241.
3. Davies, B. (1989b). Frogs and snails and feminist tales. Sydney: Allen Sc Unwin.
4. de Groot, A. D. (1974). The problem of evaluating national educational systems. In H. F. Crombag, Sc Dato N. de Gruyter (Eds,), Contemporary issues in educational testing (pp. 9-27). Den Haag: Mouton.
5. Grever, M. (1991). Pivoting the centre. Women's history as a compulsory examination subject in all Dutch secondary schools in 1990-1991. Gender & History, 3, 65-81.
6. Hermsen, J. J. & van Lenning, A. (Eds.). (1991). Sharing the difference. Feminist debates in Holland. London/New York: Routledge.
7. Janssen, J., den Hart, J., den Draak Chr. (1989). Praying practices. The Journal of Empirical Theology, 2(2), 28-39.
8. Janssen, T. & Rijlaarsdam, G. (1990). What do pupils learn from literature teaching? In M. Hayhoe «Sc S. Parker (Eds.), Reading and response (pp. 95-106). Milton Keynes: Open University.
9. Kenway, J. (1994). Making 'hope practical' rather than 'despair convincing': Feminist post-structuralism, gender reform, and educational change. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 15(2), 187-210.
10. Kneedler, P. (1988). Differences between boys and girls on California's new statewide assessment in history-social science. Unpublished paper presented at the annual meeing of the California Council for the Social Studies.
11. Kreeft, H. P. J. (1991). Examens LBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO, 1990. [Secondary education examinations, 1990] Arnhem: Cito.
12. Malson, R., O'Barr, J., Westphal-Wihl, S., Wyer, M. (Eds.). (1989). Feminist theory in practice and process. Chicago: University of Chicago.
13. Ministerie van Onderwijs en Wetenschappen. (1979). Schets van een beleid voor emancipatie in onderwijs en wetenschappelijk onderzoek [Outline of a policy for equal opportunities in education and research]. Den Haag: Author.
14. Nicholson, L. (Ed.) (1990). Feminism/Postmodernism. New York: Routledge.
15. Noddings, N. (1992). Social studies and feminism. Theory and Research in Social Education, 20(3), 230-241.
16. Scott, J. W. (1986). Gender: A useful category of historical analysis. American Historical Review, 91, 1053-1075.
17. ten Dam, G., Farkas Teekens, H., & van Loosbroek T. (1991). Leerverschillen tussen meisjes en jongens. Effecten van vrouwengeschiedenis in het voortgezet onderwijs. [Learning differences between girls and boys. The effects of women's history in secondary education.] Amsterdam: Algemene Hogeschool Amsterdam, Pedagogiek Publikatie, 2.
18. ten Dam, G. T. M. & Volman, M. L. L. (1995). Feminist research and educational policy. Journal of Education Policy, 10.
19. ten Dam, G. T. M., & Farkas Teekens, H. (in press). The gender inclusiveness of a women's history curriculum in secondary education. Women's Studies International Forum.
20. van der Kamp, M. (1980). Wat neemt de leerling mee van kunstzinnige vorming? [What do pupils get out of art education?] Den Haag: Staatsuitgeverij.
21. van der Kamp, M. (1984). Self-assessment as a tool for the evaluation of learning outcomes. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 10, 265-272.
22. van Kesteren, B. (1989). Gebruiksmogelijkheden van het learner report. [Possibilities for using the learner report.] Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch, 14(1), 13-29.
23. Volman, M., ten Dam, G., & van Eck, E. (1993). Girls in the educational research discourse. Comenius, 13(2), 196-217.