Hypothesizing and Theorizing: Challenge in an Early Childhood Curriculum*

Gifted and Talented International

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 38-49

  Hertzog, Nancy B ^a   Klein, Marjorie M ^a   Katz, Lilian G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039137133     PISSN: 15332276     EISSN: 24709565     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15332276.1999.11672904     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Anderson, L. W., Burns, R. B., (1989). Research in classrooms. The study of Teachers, teaching and instruction. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
2. Berk, L. E., & Winsler, A., (1995). Scaffolding children’s learning: Vygotsky and Early Childhood Education. Washington, DC: NAEYC.
3. Bredekamp, S., & Rosegrant, T., (Eds.) (1992). Reaching potentials: Appropriate curriculum and assessment for young children. Vol. 1. Washington, DC: NAEYC.
4. Bredekamp, S., & Rosegrant, T., (Eds.) (1995). Reaching potentials: Transforming early childhood curriculum and assessment. Vol. 2. Washington, DC: NAEYC.
5. Duckworth, E., (1996). The having of wonderful ideas and other essays on teaching and learning (2nd ed.). NY: Teachers College Press.
6. Eisner, E. W., (1997, January). Cognition and representation, A way to pursue an American dream. Kappan, 349–353.
7. Feinburg, S., & Mindness, M., (1994). Eliciting children’s full potential. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
8. Gallas, K., (1995). Talking their way into science. Hearing children’s questions and theories, responding with curricula. NY: Teachers College Press.
9. Hertzog, N. B., (under review). Gifted education in an early childhood context: A secret we should share.
10. Hertzog, N. B., & Fowler, S. A., (1999, February/March). Perspectives; Evaluating an early childhood gifted education program. Roeper Review, 21, (3), 222–227.
11. Kaplan, S., (1986). The grid: A model to construct differentiated curriculum for the gifted. In J. S. Maker, C. J., (1982). Curriculum development for the gifted. Rockville, MD: Aspen Systems Corporation.
12. Katz, L., & Chard, S., (1994). Engaging children’s minds: The project approach. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
13. Katz, L., & Chard, S., (in press). Engaging children’s minds: The project approach. 2nd Edition. Stamford, CT: Ablex.
14. Maker, C. J., (1982). Curriculum development for the gifted. Rockville, MD: Aspen Systems Corporation.
15. New, R. S., (1989). Projects and provocations: Preschool curriculum ideas from Reggio Emilia, Italy. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 318565)
16. Passow, H. A., (1982). Differentiated curricula for the gifted/talented. Ventura, CA: Ventura County Superintendent of Schools Office.
17. Renzulli, J. S., (1977). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
18. Van Tassel-Baska, J., (1992). Planning effettive curriculum for gifted learners. Denver, CO: Love.
19. Vygotsky, L., (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.