Macro and micro goal setting: In search of coherence

Applied Psychology

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 579-595

  De Haas, Marco ^a   Algera, Jen ^a   Van Tuijl, Harrie ^a   Meulman, Jacqueline ^b  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039002234     PISSN: 0269994X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1464-0597.00033     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Borg, I., Staufenbiel, T., & Pritchard, R.D. (1995). Identifying strategic objectives in productivity management: Combining features of HISYS and ProMES. In R.D. Pritchard (Ed.), Productivity measurement and improvement: organizational case studies (pp. 312-324). New York: Praeger.
2. Cohen, M.D., March, J.G., & Olsen, J.P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 1-25.
3. Haas, M. de (in press). Strategic dialogue: In search of organizational goal coherence, PhD monograph, Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands (in press).
4. Haas, M. de, & Kleingeld, P.A.M. (1999). Multilevel design of performance measurement systems: Enhancing strategic dialogue throughout the organization. Management Accounting Research, 10, 233-261.
5. Hollenbeck, J.R., Klein, H.J., O'Leary, A.M., & Wright, P.M. (1989). Investigation of the construct validity of a self-report measure of goal commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 951-956.
6. Hronec, S.M. (1993). Vital signs: Using quality, time and cost performance measurements to chart your company's future. New York: Amacom.
7. Imai, M. (1986). Kaizen: The key to Japan's competitive success. New York: Random House Business Division.
8. Locke, E.A., & Latham, G.P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9. Meulman, J.J., & Heiser, W.J. (1999). SPSS Categories 10.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc.
10. Naylor, J.C., Pritchard, R.D., & Ilgen, D.R. (1980). A theory of behavior in organizations. New York: Academic Press.
11. Pritchard, R.D. (Ed.) (1995). Productivity measurement and improvement: Organizational case studies. New York: Praeger.
12. Pritchard, R.D., & Roth, P.J. (1991). Accounting for non-linear utility functions in composite measures of productivity and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 341-359.
13. Rodgers, R.C., & Hunter, J.E. (1991). Impact of management by objectives on organizational productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76 (2), 322-336.
14. Staufenbiel, T., & Borg, I. (1992). HISYS, a program for the scaling and measurement of hierarchical systems. In F. Faulbaum (Ed.), Softstat '91 (pp. 161-166). Stuttgart, Germany: Fischer.
15. Tuijl, H.F.J.M. van, Kleingeld, P.A.M., Schmidt, K.H., Kleinbeck, U., Pritchard, R.D., & Algera, J.A. (1997). Measuring and enhancing organizational productivity by means of ProMES: Three practical implications. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 6, 279-301.
16. Witt, L.A. (1998). Enhancing organizational congruence: A solution to organizational politics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 666-674.