Designing better schools: The meaning and measure of enabling school structures

Educational Administration Quarterly

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 296-321

  Hoy, Wayne K ^a   Sweetland, Scott R ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038970139     PISSN: 0013161X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00131610121969334     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Adler, P. S. (1993). The "learning bureaucracy": New United Motors Manufacturing Incorporated. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 12, pp. 111-194). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
2. Adler, P. S. (1999). Building better bureaucracies. Academy of Management Executive, 13, 36-49.
3. Adler, P. S., & Borys, B. (1996). Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 61-89.
4. Aiken, M., & Hage, J. (1968). Organizational interdependence and intra-organizational structure. American Sociological Review, 33, 912-930.
5. Anderson, J. G. (1968). Bureaucracy in education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
6. Arches, J. (1991). Social structure, burnout, and job satisfaction. Social Work, 36(3), 202-206.
7. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
8. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Introduction. In B. M. Bass & B. J. Avolio (Eds.), Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership (pp. 1-10). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Bennis, W., & Nanus, B. (1985). Leaders: The strategies for taking charge. New York: Harper & Row.
10. Blau, P. M. (1955). The dynamics of bureaucracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. Blau, P. M., & Scott, W. R. (1962). Formal organizations: A comparative approach. San Francisco: Chandler.
12. Capper, C. (1993). Educational administration in a pluralistic society. Albany: State University of New York Press.
13. Coleman, J. S. (1974). Power and structure of society. New York: Norton.
14. Covey, S. R. (1990). The seven habits of highly effective people: Restoring the character ethic. New York: Simon & Schuster.
15. Craig, T. (1995). Achieving innovation through bureaucracy. California Management Review, 38(10), 8-36.
16. Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 555-591.
17. De Dreu, C., & Van De Vliert, E. (1997). Using conflict in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. DiPaola, M. F., & Hoy, W. K. (2001). Formalization, conflict, and change: Constructive and destructive consequences of conflict in schools. International Journal of Educational Management, 15, 238-244.
19. Etzioni, A. (1961). A comparative analysis of complex organizations. New York: Free Press.
20. Etzioni, A. (1975). A comparative analysis of complex organizations (Rev. ed.). New York: Free Press.
21. Ferguson, K. E. (1984). The feminist case against bureaucracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
22. Goddard, R. D., Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. K. (in press). Teacher trust in students and parents: A multilevel examination of the distribution and effects of teacher trust in urban elementary schools. Elementary School Journal.
23. Gouldner, A. (1954). Patterns of industrial bureaucracy. New York: Free Press.
24. Hage, J., & Aiken, M. (1970). Social change in complex organizations. New York: Random House.
25. Halpin, A. W. (1959). The leader behavior of school superintendents. Chicago: Midwest Administrative Center.
26. Hirschhorn, L. (1997). Reworking authority: Leading and following in a post-modern organization Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Hoy, W. K., Blazovsky, R., & Newland, W. (1983). Bureaucracy and alienation: A comparative analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, 21, 109-121.
28. Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2001). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
29. Hoy, W. K., & Sweetland, S. R. (2000). School bureaucracies that work: Enabling, not coercive. Journal of School Leadership, 10, 525-541.
30. Hoy, W. K., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (1999). Five faces of trust: An empirical confirmation in urban elementary schools. Journal of School Leadership, 9, 184-208.
31. Isherwood, G., & Hoy, W. K. (1973). Bureaucracy, powerlessness, and teacher work values. Journal of Educational Administration, 9, 124-138.
32. Jackson, S., & Schuler, R. S. (1985). A meta-analysis and conceptual critique of research on role ambiguity and role conflict in work settings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36, 17-78.
33. Kakabadse, A. (1986). Organizational alienation and job climate. Small Group Behavior, 17, 458-471.
34. Larson, C. L. (1997). Is the land of oz an alien nation? A sociopolitical study of school community conflict Educational Administration Quarterly, 33, 312-350.
35. Leithwood, K., & Duke, D. L. (1999). A century's quest to understand school leadership. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp 45-72). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
36. Martin, J., & Knopoff, K. (in press). The gendered implications of apparently gender-neutral theory Rereading Weber. In E. Freeman and A. Larson (Eds.), Ruffin lecturess series: Business ethics and women's studies (Vol. 3). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37. Merton, R. (1957). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.
38. Michaels, R. E., Cron, W. L., Dubinsky, A. J., & Joachimsthaler, E. A. (1988). Influence of formalization on the organizational commitment and work alienation of salespeople and industrial buyers. Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 376-383.
39. Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
40. Mintzberg, H. (1989). Mintzberg on management. New York: Free Press.
41. Moeller, G. H., & Charters, W. W., Jr. (1966). Relation of bureaucratization to sense of power among teachers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 10, 444-465.
42. Nyberg, D. (1993). The varnished truth: Truth telling and deceiving in ordinary life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43. Rizzo, J., House, R., & Lirtzman, S. (1970). Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15, 150-163.
44. Rousseau, D. M. (1978). Characteristics of departments, positions, and individuals: Contexts for attitudes and behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 521-540.
45. Scott, W. R. (1998). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
46. Senatra, P. T. (1980). Role conflict, role ambiguity, and organizational climate in a public accounting firm. Accounting Review, 55, 594-603.
47. Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
48. Sweetland, S. R., & Hoy, W. K. (2000). School characteristics and educational outcomes: Toward an organizational model of student achievement in middle schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36, 703-729.
49. Sweetland, S. R., & Hoy, W. K. (in press). Varnishing the truth in schools: Principals and teachers spinning reality. Journal of Educational Administration.
50. Von Krogh, G., Ichijo, K., & Nonaka, I. (2000). Enabling knowledge creation. New York: Oxford University Press.
51. Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organizations (A. M. Henderson & T. Parsons, Trans.). New York: Free Press.