Does MANNER count or not? Manner-of-motion verbs revisited

Linguistics

Volumn 40, Issue 377, 2002, Pages 61-110

  Iwata, Seizi ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038897446     PISSN: 00243949     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/ling.2002.008     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Allerton, D. J. (1982). Valency and the English Verb. London: Academic Press.
2. Aske, Jon (1989). Path predicates in English and Spanish: a closer look. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. 1-14. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
3. Boas, Hans Christian (2000). Resultative constructions in English and German. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
4. _(forthcoming). On constructional polysemy and verbal polysemy in construction grammar. In Proceedings of the Western Conference on Linguistics 2000.
5. Bouchard, Denis (1995). The Semantics of Syntax: A Minimalist Approach to Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6. Brugman, Claudia (1988a). The Story of Over: Polysemy, Semantics, and the Structure of the Lexicon. New York: Garland.
7. _(1988b). The syntax and semantics of HAVE and its complements. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.
8. _(1990). What is the invariance hypothesis? Cognitive Linguistics 1, 257-266.
9. Davis, Anthony (1996). Lexical semantics and linking in the hierarchical lexicon. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.
10. Declerck, Renaat (1979). On the progressive and the "imperfective paradox." Linguistics and Philosophy 3, 267-272.
11. Dewell, Robert (1994). Over again: image-schema transformations in semantic analysis. Cognitive Linguistics 5, 351-380.
12. Dowty, David (1991). Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67, 547-619.
13. _(2000). "The garden swarms with bees" and the fallacy of "argument alternation." In Polysemy: Theoretical and Computational Approaches, Yael Ravin and Claudia Leacock (eds.), 111-128. New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Fillmore, Charles (1975). An alternative to checklist theories of meaning. In Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 123-131. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
15. _(1977a). The case for case reopened. In Grammatical Relations, Peter Cole (ed.), 59-81. Syntax and Semantics 8. New York: Academic Press.
16. _(1977b). Topics in lexical semantics. In Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, Peter Cole (ed.), 76-138. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
17. _(1982). Frame semantics. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), 111-138. Seoul: Hanshin.
18. _; and Atkins, B. T. S. (1992). Toward a frame-based lexicon: the semantics of RISK and its neighbors. In Frames, Fields, and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization, A. Lehrer and E. F. Kittay (eds.), 75-102. Hillsadale, N J: Erlbaum.
19. _; and Atkins, B. T. S. (2000). Describing polysemy: the case of 'crawl'. In Polysemy: Theoretical and Computational Approaches, Yael Ravin and Claudia Leacock (eds.), 91-110. New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Flickinger, Daniel (1987). Lexical rules in the hierarchical lexicon. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.
21. Fong, Vivienne: and Poulin; Christine (1998). Locating linguistic variation in semantic templates. In Discourse and Cognition. J.-P. Koenig (ed.), 29-39. Stanford: CSLI.
22. Goldberg, Adele (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. Hale, Ken; and Keyser, Jay (1997). On the complex nature of simple predicators. In Complex Predicates, A. Alsina, J. Bresnan, and P. Sells (eds.), 29-65. Stanford: CSLI.
24. _; and Keyser, Jay (1999). Bound features, merge and transitivity alternation. In Papers from the UPenn/MIT Roundtable on the Lexicon, 49-72. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 35. Cambridge, MA: Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT.
25. Iwata, Seizi (1996). Motion and extent: two sides of the same coin. Studia Linguistica 50, 256-282.
26. _(1998). A Lexical Network Approach to Verbal Semantics. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
27. _(2001). The role of verb meaning in locative alternations. Paper read at the First International Conference on Construction Grammar, University of California at Berkeley.
28. Jackendoff, Ray (1987). Consciousness and the Computational Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. _(1990). Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. _(1996a). Conceptual semantics and cognitive linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics 7, 93-129.
31. _(1996b). The proper treatment of measuring out, telicity, and perhaps even quantification in English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14, 305-354.
32. _(1997a). The Architecture of the Language Faculty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. _(1997b). Twistin' the night away. Language 73, 534-559.
34. Kiparsky. Paul (1997). Remarks on denominal verbs. In Complex Predicates, Alex Alsma, Joan Bresnan, and Peter Sells (eds.), 473-499. Stanford: CSLI.
35. Koenig Jean-Pierre (1999). Lexical Relations. Stanford: CSLI.
36. Kreitzer, Anatol (1997). Multiple levels of schematization: a study in the conceptualization of space. Cognitive Linguistics 8, 291-325.
37. Lakoff, George (1987). Women. Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38. Langacker, Ronald (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
39. _(1991). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 2: Descriptive Applications, Stantord: Stanford University Press.
40. Levin, Beth (1993). English Verb Classes and Alternations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41. _(2000). Aspect, lexical semantic representation, and argument expression. Paper read at the 26th meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society.
42. _; and Rapoport, Tovav (1988). Lexical subordination. In Papers from the 24th Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 275-289. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
43. _; and Rappaport Hovav, Malka (1991). Wiping the slate clean: a lexical semantic exploration. Cognition 41, 123-151.
44. _; and Rappaport Hovav, Malka (1995). Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45. _; and Rappaport Hovav, Malka (1998). Morphology and lexical semantics. In Handbook of Morphology, Andrew Spencer and Arnold Zwicky (eds.), 248-271. Oxford: Blackwell.
46. _; Song, Grace; and Atkins, B. T. S. (1997). Making sense of corpus data: a case study of verbs of sound. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 2, 23-64.
47. Lindner Susan (1982). What goes up doesn't necessarily come down: the ins and outs ot opposites. In Papers from the 18th Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 305-323. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
48. _(1983) A lexico-semantic analysis of verb-particle constructions with up and out. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California, San Diego. (Available from IULC.)
49. Maruta, Tadao (1998). Shieki-Dooshi no Anatomii [Anatomy of Causative Verbs]. Shohakusha: Tokyo.
50. Matsumoto, Yo (1996a). Subjective motion and English and Japanese verbs. Cognitive Linguistics 7, 183-226.
51. _; (1996b) How abstract is subjective motion? A comparison of coverage path expressions and access path expressions. In Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language, A. Goldberg (ed.), 359-374. Stanford: CSLI.
52. _(2000). Causative alternation in English and Japanese: a closer look. English Linguistics 17, 160-192.
53. McKoon, Gail; and Macfarland, Talke (2000). Externally and internally caused change of state verbs. Language 76, 833-858.
54. Nemoto, Noriko (1998). On the polysemy of ditransitwe save: the role of frame semantics in construction grammar. English Linguistics 15, 219-242.
55. Norvig, Peter; and Lakoff, George (1987). Taking: a study in lexical network theory. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 195-205. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
56. Petruck, Miriam (1996). Frame semantics. In Handbook of Pragmatics, J. Verschueren, J.-O. Ostman. J. Blommaert, and C. Bulcaen (eds.), 1-13. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
57. Pinker, Steven (1989). Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
58. Pollard, Carl; and Sag, Ivan (1987). Information-Based Syntax and Semantics, vol. 1: Fundamentals. Stanford: CSLI.
59. _; and Sag, Ivan (1994). Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago and San Diego: University of Chicago Press and CSLI.
60. Rapoport, Tovav (1999). Structure, aspect, and the predicate. Language 75, 653-677.
61. Rappaport Hovav. Malka; and Levin, Beth (1998). Building verb meanings. In The Projection of Arguments, M. Butt and W. Geuder (eds.), 97-134. Stanford: CSLI.
62. Rudzka-Ostyn, Brygida (1989). Prototypes, schemas, and cross-category correspondences: the case of ask. Linguistics 27, 613-661.
63. Sag, Ivan; and Wasow, Thomas (1999). Syntactic Theory: A Formal Introduction. Stanford: CSLI.
64. Sandra, Dominiek; and Rice, Sally (1995). Network analyses of prepositional meaning: mirroring whose mind - the linguist's or the language user's? Cognitive Linguistics 6, 89-130.
65. Slobin, Dan (1996). Two ways to travel: verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning, M. Shibatani and S. Thompson (eds.), 195-219. Oxford: Clarendon.
66. _; and Hoiting, Nini (1994). Reference to movement in spoken and signed languages: typological consideration. In Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 487-505. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
67. Sweetser, Eve (1986). Polysemy vs. abstraction: mutually exclusive or complementary? In Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 528-538. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
68. Talmy, Leonard (1983). How language structures space. In Spatial Orientation: Theory, Research and Application. H. Pick and L. Acredolo (eds.), 225-282. New York: Plenum.
69. _(1985). Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. 3: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, T. Shopen (ed.), 57-149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
70. _(1988). The relation of grammar to cognition. In Topics in Cognitive Linguistics, B. Rudzka-Ostyn (ed.). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
71. _(1991). Path to realization: a typology of event conflation. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 480-519. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
72. _(2000a). Toward a Cognitive Semantics, vol. 1: Concept Structuring Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
73. _(2000b). Toward a Cognitive Semantics, vol.2: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
74. Tanaka, Shigenori (1997). Kuukan-hyougen-no imi-kinou [Semantic functions of spatial expressions]. In Nichi-ei-go Hikaku-sensho, vol. 6: Kuukan-to Ido-no Hyougen [Expressions of Space and Motion], S. Tanaka and Y. Matsumoto (eds.), 2-125. Tokyo: Kenkyusha.
75. Taylor, John (1989). Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Clarendon.
76. _(1996). On running and jogging. Cognitive Linguistics 7, 21-34.
77. Vandeloise, Claude (1990). Representation, prototypes, and centrality. In Meanings and Prototypes: Studies in Linguistic Categorization, S. L. Tshohatzidis (ed.), 403-437. London: Routledge.
78. van der Leek, Frederike (1996). Rigid syntax and flexible meaning: the case of the English ditransitive. In Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language. A. Goldberg (ed.), 321-332. Stanford: CSLI.
79. van Voorst, Jan (1993). Against a composite analysis of certain causative constructions. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 8, 145-165.
80. Yaguello, Marina; and Sweetser, Eve (1999). Grammar and metaphor. Paper read at the Paris-Berkeley Enunciative and Cognitive Linguistics Workshop, Round 3, University of California at Berkeley.