Conceptual Semantics and Cognitive Linguistics

Cognitive Linguistics

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 93-129

  Jackendoff, Ray ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84945413363     PISSN: 09365907     EISSN: 16133641     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/cogl.1996.7.1.93     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Bierwisch, Manfred 1986 On the nature of semantic form in natural language. In Klix, F. and H. Hagendorf, (eds.), Human Memory and Cognitive Capabilities: Mechanisms and Performances. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland, 765-784.
2. Chomsky, Noam 1957 Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.
3. Chomsky, Noam 1981 Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
4. Csuri, P. to appear Generalized referential dependencies. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA.
5. Culicover, P., and Ray Jackendoff 1995 Something eise for the binding theory. Linguistic Inquiry 26: 249-275.
6. Deane, Paul 1991 Limits to attention: A cognitive theory of island phenomena. Cognitive Linguistics 2: 1-64.
7. Culicover, P., and Ray Jackendoff 1995 On Jackendoff's conceptual semantics.
8. Dennett, D. C. 1995 Darwin's Dangerous Idea. New York: Simon and Schuster.
9. Dewell, Robert B. 1994 Over again: Image-schema transformations in semantic analysis. Cognitive Linguistics 5: 351-380.
10. Dixon, R. M. W. 1982 Where Have All the Adjectives Gone? Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
11. Dowty, D. 1979 Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.
12. Emonds, Joseph E. 1991 Subcategorization and syntax-based theta-role assignment. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9: 369-429.
13. Erteschik-Shir, N., and S. Lappin 1979 Dominance and the functional explanation of island phenomena. Theoretical Linguistics 6:41-85.
14. Fauconnier, Gilles 1984 Mental Spaces. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Fauconnier, Gilles, and M. Turner 1994 Conceptual projection and middle spaces. La Jolla, Department of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego.
16. Fillmore, Charles 1992 The Grammar of Home. Linguistic Society of America Presidential Address.
17. Fillmore, Charles and Paul Kay 1993 Construction Grammar Coursebook. University of California, Berkeley: Copy Central.
18. Fillmore, Charles, Paul Kay, and Catherine O'Connor 1988 Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let ahne. Language 64: 501-538.
19. Fodor, Jerry A. 1975 The Language of Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Fodor, Jerry A. 1983 Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Fodor, Jerry A. 1994 Paper given at State University of New York Buffalo Summer Institute on Cognitive Science.
22. Goldberg, Adele 1992a The inherent semantics of argument structure: The case of the English ditransitive construction. Cognitive Linguistics 3: 37-74.
23. Goldberg, Adele 1992b In support of a semantic account of resultatives. (CSLI Technical Report No. 163.) Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
24. Goldberg, Adele 1993 Making one's way through the data. In Aisina, A. (ed.), Complex Predicates. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
25. Gruber, J. S. 1965 Studies in Lexical Relations. (Doctoral dissertation, MIT.) Reprinted by Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, IN.
26. Gruber, J. S. 1976 Reprintedas part of Lexical Structures in Syntax and Semantics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
27. Hinrichs, E. 1985 A compositional semantics for Aktionsarten and NP reference in English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.
28. Hochberg, J. E. 1978 Perception. (2nd edition.) Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall.
29. Jackendoff, Ray 1969 Some rules of semantic Interpretation for English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT.
30. Jackendoff, Ray 1972 Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Jackendoff, Ray 1975 On belief-contexts. Linguistic Inquiry 6(1): 53-93.
32. Jackendoff, Ray 1976 Toward an explanatory semantic representation. Linguistic Inquiry 7(1): 89-150.
33. Jackendoff, Ray 1978 Grammar as evidence for conceptual structure. In Halle, M., J. Bresnan, and G. Miller (eds.), Linguistic Theory and Psychological Reality, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 201-228.
34. Jackendoff, Ray 1981a Senso e referenza in una semantica basata sulla psicologia. Quaderni di Semantica 3: 3-24.
35. Jackendoff, Ray 1984 Sense and reference in a psychologically based semantics. In Bever, T., J. Carroll, and L. Miller (eds.), Talking Minds: The Study of Language in the Cognitive Sciences, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 49-72.
36. Jackendoff, Ray 1983 Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. Jackendoff, Ray 1985 Multiple subcategorization and the theta-criterion: The case of climb. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 271-296.
38. Jackendoff, Ray 1987 Consciousness and the Computational Mind. Cambridge, M A: Bradford/MIT Press.
39. Jackendoff, Ray 1990 Semantic Structures. Cambridge, M A: MIT Press.
40. Jackendoff, Ray 1991a The problem of reality. Noüs 25(4): 411-433. (Also in Jackendoff [1992c])
41. Jackendoff, Ray 1991b Parts and boundaries. Cognition 41: 9-45.
42. Jackendoff, Ray 1992 Reprinted in Levin, B. and S. Pinker (eds.), Lexical and Conceptual Semantics, Cambridge, M A: Blackwell, 9-45.
43. Jackendoff, Ray 1992a Word meanings and what it takes to learn them: Reflections on the Piaget-Chomsky debate, in Jackendoff 1992c.
44. Jackendoff, Ray 1994 Also in Overton, W. and D. Palermo (eds.), The Nature and Ontogenesis of Meaning, 129-144. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. Jackendoff, Ray 1992b Mme. Tussaud meets the binding theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10(1): 1-31.
46. Jackendoff, Ray 1992c Languages of the Mind: Essays on Mental Representation. Cambridge, M A: MIT Press.
47. Jackendoff, Ray 1993 Patterns in the Mind: Language and Human Nature. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf; New York: Basic Books.
48. Jackendoff, Ray to appear a The proper treatment of measuring out, telicity, and perhaps even quantification in Engüsh. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory.
49. Jackendoff, Ray to appear b The architecture of the linguistic-spatial Interface. In Bloom, P., M. Peterson, L. Nadel, and M. Garrett (eds.), Language and Space, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50. Jackendoff, Ray and David Aaron 1991 Review article on Lakolf, G. and M. Turner, More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Language 67(2): 320-338.
51. Jackendoff, Ray, J. Maling, and Annie Zaenen 1993 Home is subject to principle A. Linguistic Inquiry 24(1): 173-177.
52. Katz, Jerrold J. 1972 Semantic Theory. New York: Harper and Row.
53. Koifka, Kurt 1935 Principles of Gestalt Psychology. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.
54. Kosslyn, S. 1980 Image and Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
55. Krifka, M. 1992 Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution. In Sag, L and A. Szabolcsi (eds.), Lexical Matters. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 29-54.
56. Lakoff, George 1970 Jrregularity in Syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. (Publication of 1965 doctoral dissertation.)
57. Lakoff, George 1987 Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
58. Lakoff, George 1990 The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reasoning based on image-schemas? Cognitive Linguistics 1: 39-74.
59. Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson 1980 Metaphor s We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
60. Landau, Barbara and Ray Jackendorf 1993 “What” and “where” in spatial language and spatial cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16(2): 217-238.
61. Langacker, Ronald 1987 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
62. Langacker, Ronald 1991 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 2. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
63. Lerdahl, Fred and Ray Jackendoff 1983 A Generative Theory ofTonal Music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
64. Macnamara, J. 1978 How do we talk about what we see? Unpublished manuscript, McGill University.
65. Maling, J. 1993 Of nominative and accusative: The hierarchical assignment of grammatical case in Finnish. In Holmberg, A. and U. Nikanne (eds.), Case and other Functional Categories in Finnish Syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 49-74.
66. Marantz, A. 1992 The way-construction and the semantics of direct arguments in English: A reply to Jackendoff. In Stowell, T. and E. Wehrli (eds.), Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 26. Syntax and the Lexicon. New York: Academic Press, 179-188.
67. Marr, David 1982 Vision. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
68. Michotte, A. 1954 La perception de la causalité. (2nd edition.) Louvain: Publications Universitaires de Louvain. English translation: New York: Basic Books.
69. Michotte, A., G. Thinés, and G. Crabbé 1964 Les compléments amodaux des structures perspectives. Louvain: Publications Universitaires de Louvain.
70. Neisser, U. 1967 Cognitive Psychology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
71. Pinker, S. 1989 Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: Bradford/MIT Press.
72. Pinker, S. and Paul Bloom 1990 Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13: 707-726.
73. Pustejovsky, James 1991 The generative lexicon. Computational Linguistics 17: 409-441.
74. Ruhl, C. 1989 On Monosemy: A Study in Linguistic Semantics. Albany: SUNY Press.
75. Talmy, Leonard 1978 The relation of grammar to cognition-A synopsis. In Waltz, D. (ed.), Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing 2. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 14-24.
76. Talmy, Leonard 1980 Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Shopen, T. et al., (eds.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 3. New York: Cambridge University Press.
77. Talmy, Leonard 1983 How language structures space. In Pick, H. and L. Acredolo (eds.), Spatial Orientalion: Theory, Research, and Application. New York: Plenum.
78. Talmy, Leonard 1985 Force dynamics in language and thought. In Papers Front the Twenty-First Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
79. Talmy, Leonard 1988 Republished in Cognitive Science 12(1): 49-100.
80. Talmy, Leonard 1995 Fictive motion. In Bloom, P., M. Peterson, L. Nadel, and M. Garrett (eds.), Language and Space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
81. Tenny, C. 1987 Grammaticalizing aspect and affectedness. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT.
82. Tenny, C. 1992 The aspectual interface hypothesis. In Sag, I. and A. Szabolcsi (eds.), Lexical Matters, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 1-28.
83. Meulen, Alice 1994 Representing meaning: magic or logic? (Review of Jackendoff 1990) Semiotica 99: 211-215.
84. Vandeloise, Claude 1986 L'espace enfranfais. Paris: Editions du Seuil.
85. Van Hoek, Karen 1992 Paths through conceptual structure: constraints on pronominal anaphora. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California at San Diego.
86. Verkuyl, H. 1972 On the Compositional Nature of the Aspects. Dordrecht: Reidel.
87. Verkuyl, H. 1985 On semantics without logic (Review of Jackendoff 1983). Lingua 68:59-90.
88. Verkuyl, H. 1989 Aspectual classes and aspectual composition. Linguistics and Philosophy 12(1): 39-94.
89. Wertheimer, M. 1923 Laws of organization in perceptual forms.
90. Wertheimer, M. 1938 Reprinted in Ellis, W. D. (ed.), A Source Book of Gestalt Psychology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 71-88.
91. Wilks, Y. 1992 Review of Jackendoff 1990. Computational Linguistics 18:95-97.
92. Yip, M., J. Maling, and Ray Jackendoff 1987 Case in tiers. Language 63(2): 217-250.
93. Zaenen, Annie, J. Maling, and H. Thrainsson 1985 Case and grammatical functions: The Icelandic passive. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 441-484