The influence of cooperative problem solving on gender differences in achievement, self-efficacy, and attitudes toward mathematics in gifted students

Gifted Child Quarterly

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 268-282

  Garduño, Edna Leticia Hernández ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038895832     PISSN: 00169862     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/001698620104500405     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Allen, S. D. (1991). Ability grouping research review: What do they say about grouping and the gifted? Educational Leadership, 48(6), 60-65.
2. Arlin, M. (1976). Arlin Hills Attitude Toward Mathematics Secondary. Jacksonville, IL: Psychologists & Educators.
3. Armstrong, J. M. (1985). A national assessment of participation and achievement of women in mathematics. In S. F. Chipman, L. R. Brush, & D. M. Wilson (Eds.), Women and mathematics: Balancing the equation (pp. 59-94). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Badger, M. E. (1981). Why aren't girls better at mathematics? A review of research. Educational Research, 24, 11-23.
5. Balacheff, N. (1990). Future perspectives for research in the psychology of mathematics education. In P. Nesher & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics and cognition: A research synthesis by the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 134-148). New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Becker, D., & Forsyth, R. A. (1990, April). Gender differences in academic achievement in grades 3 through 12: A longitudinal analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.
7. Bentzen, W. (1993). Seeing young children: A guide to observing and recording behaviour. New York: Delmar.
8. Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1989). Educational research: An introduction (5th ed.). New York: Longman.
9. Burns, M. (1990). The math solution: Using groups of four. In N. Davidson (Ed.), Cooperative learning in mathematics: A handbook for teachers (pp. 21-46). New York: Addison-Wesley.
10. Caporrimo, R. (1990, August). Gender, confidence, mathematics: Why aren't the girls "where the boys are"?. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Boston.
11. Carpenter, T. (1990). Teaching as problem solving. In R. Charles & E. Silver (Eds.), The teaching and assessing of mathematical problem solving (3rd ed., pp. 187-202). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
12. Cobb, P. (1994). Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 13-20.
13. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Confrey, J. (1987, July). The current state of constructivist thought in mathematics education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Group for Psychology of Mathematics Education, Montreal, Canada.
15. Davidson, N. (1990). Small-group cooperative learning in mathematics. In N. J. Cooney (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematics in the 1990s: 1990 yearbook (pp. 52-61). Reston, VA: : National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
16. Dees, R. L. (1991). The role of cooperative learning in increasing problem-solving ability in a college remedial course. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 409-421.
17. Dolan, D. T., & Williamson, J. (1983). Teaching problem-solving strategies. Reading, CA: Addison-Wesley.
18. Dossey, J. A., Mullis, J. V. S., Lindquist, M. M., & Chambers, D. L. (1988). The mathematics report card: Are we measuring up? Trends and achievement based on the 1986 national assessment. Princeton, NJ: The Nation's Report Card, NAEP, Educational Testing Service.
19. Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5-12.
20. Eccles, J. (1987). Gender roles and women's achievement-related decisions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 135-171.
21. Ernest, J. (1976). Mathematics and sex. Santa Barbara, CA: University of California.
22. Fennema, E. (1974). Mathematics learning and the sexes: A review. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 5, 126-139.
23. Fennema, E. (1982). Girls and mathematics: The crucial middle grades. In J. Smart (Ed.), Mathematics for the middle grades (5-9) (pp. 9-19). Reston, VA: : National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
24. Gallagher, A. M. (1992). Sex differences in problem-solving strategies used by high-scoring examinees on the SAT-M. New York: College Board Publications. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 352 420)
25. Gallagher, S. A. (1996). A new look (again) at gifted girls and mathematics achievement. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 7, 459-475.
26. Gavin, M. K. (1996). The development of math talent: Influences on students at a women's college. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 7, 476-485.
27. Gay, L. R. (1996). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
28. Hunt, B. (1997). The effect on mathematics achievement and attitude of homogeneous and heterogeneous grouping of gifted sixth-grade students. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 8(2), 65-73.
29. Hyde, J. S., & Fennema, E. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance and affect: Results of two meta-analyses. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.
30. Jacobs, D. L., Watson, T. G., & Sutton, J. P. (1996). Effects of a cooperative learning method on mathematics achievement and affective outcomes of students in a private elementary school. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 29, 195-202.
31. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1985). The internal dynamics of cooperative learning groups. In R. Slavin, S. Sharan, S. Kagan, R. Hertz-Lazarowitz, C. Webb, & R. Schmuck (Eds.), Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn (pp. 103-124). New York: Plenum Press.
32. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperative learning in mathematics education. In P. R. Trafon (Ed.), New directions for elementary school mathematics (pp. 234-245). Reston, VA: : National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
33. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1990). Using cooperative learning in math. In N. Davidson (Ed.), Cooperative learning in mathematics (pp. 103-125). New York: Addison-Wesley.
34. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1992). Positive interdependence: Key to effective cooperation. In R. Hertz-Lazarowits & N. Miller (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning (pp. 174-119). New York: Cambridge University Press.
35. Kamii, C. (1990). Constructivism and beginning arithmetic (K-2). In N. J. Cooney (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematics in the 1990s: 1990 yearbook (pp. 22-30). Reston, VA: : National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
36. Kenny, D., Archambault, F., & Hallmark, B. (1995). The effect of group composition on gifted and nongifted elementary students in cooperative learning groups (Report No. 94102). Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, The University of Connecticut.
37. Kulik, C. L. (1985). Effects of inter-class ability grouping on achievement and self-esteem. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles.
38. Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. L. (1989). Effects of ability grouping on student achievement. Equity and Excellence, 23, 22-30.
39. Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. L. (1990). Ability grouping and gifted students. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 178-196). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
40. Leighton, M. S., Slavin, R. E., & Davidson, N. (1989). Achievement effects of individual, small group, and cooperative learning strategies on math problem solving (Report No. 40). Baltimore: Center for Research on Elementary and Middle Schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 332 862)
41. Leikin, R. & Zaslavsky, O. (1997). Facilitating student interactions in mathematics in a cooperative learning setting. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 331-354.
42. Licht, B. G., & Dweck, C. S. (1983). Sex differences in achievement orientations: Consequences for academic choices and attainments. In M. Marland (Ed.), Sex differentiation and schooling (pp. 72-95). London: Heinsman Educational Books.
43. Linn, M, C., & Burbules, N. C. (1993). Construction of knowledge and group learning. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 91-120). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. Ma, X. (1996). The effects of cooperative homework on mathematics achievement of Chinese high school students. Educational Studies in Mathematics: An International Journal, 31(4), 379-387.
45. Moody, J. D., & Gifford, V. D. (1990, November). The effect of grouping by formal reasoning ability levels, group size, and gender on achievement in laboratory chemistry. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
46. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
47. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics: Addenda series grades 5-6: Dealing with data and chance. Reston, VA: Author.
48. Newman, R. (1994). Academic help seeking: A strategy of self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk (Ed.), Self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 283-301). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
49. Norwod, K. S. (1995). The effects of the use of problem solving and cooperative learning on the mathematics achievement of underprepared college freshmen. Primus, 5, 229-252.
50. Okebukola, P. A. (1986). The influence of preferred learning styles in cooperative learning in science. Science Education, 70, 509-517.
51. Owen, S. (1995). MATHConnections Questionnaire: Pre 1 (Unpublished survey). Storrs, CT: School of Education, University of Connecticut.
52. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53. Peterson, P. L., & Fennema, E. (1985). Effective teaching, student engagement in classroom activities, and sex-related differences in learning mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 22, 309-335.
54. Phillips, E., Lappan, G., Winter, M. J., & Fitzgerald, W. (1986). Middle grades mathematics project: Probability. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
55. Qin, Z., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1995). Cooperative versus competitive efforts and problem solving. Review of Educational Research, 65, 129-143.
56. Resnick-Sandler, B., Silverberg, L. A., & Hall, R. M. (1996). The chilly classroom climate: A guide to improve the education of women. Washington, DC: National Association for Women in Education.
57. Robinson, A. (1991). Cooperative learning and the academically talented student (Report No. 9106). Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, The University of Connecticut.
58. Robinson, G. E. (1990). Synthesis of research on class size. Educational Leadership, 47(7), 80-90.
59. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
60. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1987). What's all the fuss about metacognition? In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp. 189-215). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
61. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1994). Reflections on doing and teaching mathematics. In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Mathematical thinking and problem solving (pp. 53-70). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
62. Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 114-145.
63. Simon, M. A., & Schifter, D. (1987). Teacher education from a constructivist perspective: The educational leaders in mathematics project. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 313 361)
64. Slavin, R. E. (1990a). Ability grouping, cooperative learning, and the gifted. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14, 3-7
65. Slavin, R. E. (1990b). Ability grouping in the middle grades: Achievement effects and alternatives. Elementary School Journal, 93, 535-550.
66. Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(1), 43-69.
67. Slavin, R. E., Leavey, M., & Madden, N. A. (1984). Combining cooperative learning and individualized instruction: Effects on student mathematics achievement, attitudes, and behaviors. Elementary School Journal, 84, 409-422.
68. Slavin, R. E., Madden, N. A., & Leavey, M. (1984). Effects of team assisted individualization on the mathematics achievement of academically handicapped and nonhandicapped students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 813-819.
69. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
70. Thompson, P. (1985). Experience, problem solving, and learning mathematics: Considerations in developing mathematics curricula. In E. A. Silver (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 189-236). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
71. von Glasersfeld, E. (1984). An introduction to radical constructivism. In P. Watzlawick (Ed.), The invented reality (pp. 17-40). New York: Norton.
72. von Glasersfeld, E. (1993). Questions and answers about radical constructivism. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 23-38). Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum.
73. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
74. Webb, N. M. (1985). Student interaction and learning in small groups: A research summary. In R. Slavin, S. Sharan, S. Kagan, R. Hertz-Lazarowitz, C. Webb, & R. Schmuck (Eds.), Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn (pp. 147-172). New York: Plenum Press.
75. Webb, N. M. (1992). Testing a theoretical model of student interaction and learning in small groups. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy for group learning (pp. 36-48). New York: Cambridge University Press.
76. Yackel, E., Cobb, P., Wood, T., Wheatley, G., & Merkel, G. (1990). The importance of social interaction in children's construction of mathematical knowledge. In N. J. Cooney (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematics in the 1990s: 1990 yearbook (pp. 12-21). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.