School-based accountability in North Carolina: The responses of school principals

Educational Administration Quarterly

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 494-529

  Ladd, Helen F ^a   Zelli, Arnaldo ^b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038891682     PISSN: 0013161X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/001316102237670     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bryk, A. S., & Hermanson, K. (1992). Educational indicator systems: Observations on their structure, interpretation, and use. Review of Research in Education, 19, 451-484.
2. Elmore, R. F., Abelmann, C. H., & Fuhrman, S. H. (1996). The new accountability in state education reform: From process to performance. In H. F. Ladd (Ed.), Holding schools accountable: Performance-based reform in education. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
3. Gibbons, R. (1998). Incentives in organizations. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(4), 115-132.
4. Grissmer, D., & Flanagan, A. (1998). Exploring rapid achievement gains in North Carolina and Texas. Washington, DC: National Education Goals Panel.
5. Haney, W. (2000). The myth of the Texas miracle in education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(41). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n41/
6. Kelley, C. (1997, March). The Kentucky school-based performance award program: School level effects. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual conference, Chicago.
7. Kreps, D. M. (1990). A course in microeconomic theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8. Krug, S. E., Ahadi, S. A., & Scott, C. K. (1991). Current issues and research findings in the study of school leadership. Advances in Educational Administration, 2, 241-260.
9. Ladd, H. F. (Ed.). (1996). Holding schools accountable: Performance-based reform in education. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
10. Ladd, H. F. (1999). The Dallas school accountability and incentive program: An evaluation of its impacts on student outcomes. Economics of Education Review, 18, 1-16.
11. Ladd, H. F. (2001). School-based educational accountability systems: The promise and the pitfalls. National Tax Journal, 54, 385-400.
12. Ladd, H. F., & Walsh, R. P. (2002). Implementing value-added measures of school effectiveness: Getting the incentives right. Economics of Education Review, 21, 1-17.
13. Laffont, J. (1990). Analysis of hidden gaming in a three-level hierarchy. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 6, 301-324.
14. Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1992). Economics, organization and management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15. North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. (n.d.). A guide to the ABCs for principals. Raleigh, NC: Author.
16. Odden, A., & Kelley, C. (1997). Paving teachers for what they know and do: New and smarter compensation strategies to improve schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
17. Smith, S. S., & Mickelson, R. A. (2000). All that glitters is not gold: School reform in Charlotte-Mecklenburg. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(2), 101-128.
18. Toenjes, L. A., Dworkin, A. G., Lorence, J., & Hill, A. N. (2000). The lone star gamble: High stakes testing, accountability; and student achievement in Texas and Houston. Department of Sociology, University of Texas.
19. Wise, A. E., Darling-Hammond, L., & Berry, B. (1987). Effective teacher selection: From recruitment to retention. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.