Fun and effective ways to build your students' vocabulary

Intervention in School and Clinic

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 131-139

  Foil, Carolyn R ^a   Alber, Sheila R ^b  

^a Stone High School   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038890131     PISSN: 10534512     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/105345120203700301     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Anderson-Inman, L., & Ditson, L. (1999). Computer-based concept mapping: A tool for negotiating meaning. Learning and Leading with Technology, 26, 6-13.
2. Anderson-Inman, L., Knox-Quinn, C., & Horney, M. A. (1996). Computer-based study strategies for students with learning disabilities: Individual differences associated with adoption level. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 461-484.
3. Atkinson, R. C. (1975). Mnemotechnics in second-language learning. American Psychologist, 30, 821-828.
4. Avila, E., & Sadowski, M. (1996). Exploring new applications of the keyword method to acquire English vocabulary. Language Learning, 46, 379-395.
5. Birch, J., & Hatfield, P. (1995). Direct teaching of multisensory language structure. In C. McIntyre & J. Pickering (Eds.), Clinical studies of multisensory structured language education: For students with dyslexia and related disorders (pp. 44-53). Salem, OR: International Multisensory Structured Language Education Council.
6. Boning, R. (1978). World theatre: Starring the students. New York: Barnell Loft.
7. Bos, C., & Anders, P. (1990). Effects of interactive vocabulary instruction on the vocabulary learning and reading comprehension of junior-high learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13, 31-42.
8. Casale, V., & Manzo, A. (1982). Differential effects of cognitive, affective, and proprioceptive instructional approaches on vocabulary acquisition. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 222 879)
9. Cavenaugh, R. A., Heward, W. L., & Donelson, F. (1996). Effects of response cards during lesson closure on the academic performance of secondary students in an earth science course. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 403-406.
10. Cook, D. (1989). Strategic learning in the content areas. Madison: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
11. Duffelmeyer, F. (1980). The influence of experience-based vocabulary instruction on learning word meaning. Journal of Reading, 24, 35-40.
12. Ellis, E. (1992). LINCS: A starter strategy for vocabulary learning. Lawrence, KS: Edge.
13. Fulk, B. J. M., Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (1992). Mnemonic generalization training with learning disabled adolescents. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 7, 2-10.
14. Gardner, R., III, Heward, W. L., & Grossi, T. A. (1994). Effects of response cards on student participation and academic achievement: A systematic replication with inner-city students during whole-class science instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 63-71.
15. Goldsworthy, C. (1996). Developmental reading disabilities: A language based treatment approach. San Diego: Singular.
16. Guillory, H. G. (1998). The effects of keyword captions to authentic French video on learner comprehension. CALICO Journal, 15, 89-108.
17. Gumpel, T. P., & Frank, R. (1999). An expansion of the peer-tutoring paradigm: Cross-age peer tutoring of social skills among socially rejected boys. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 115-118.
18. Heward, W. L. (1994). Three "low-tech" strategies for increasing the frequency of active student response during group instruction. In R. Gardner III, D. Sainato, J. O. Cooper, T. E. Heron, W. L. Heward, J. Eshleman, & T. A. Grossi (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instruction (pp. 283-320). Monterey, CA: Brookes-Cole.
19. Heward, W. L., Gardner, R., III, Cavanaugh, R. A., Courson, F. H., Grossi, T. A., & Barbetta, P. M. (1996). Everyone participates in this class. Teaching Exceptional Children, 28, 4-10.
20. Hughes, C. A. (1996). Memory and test-taking strategies. In D. D. Deshler, E. S. Ellis, & B. K. Lenz (Eds.), Teaching adolescents with learning disabilities: Strategies and methods (2nd ed.). Denver, CO: Love. Inspiration Software, Inc. (1998). Portland, OR.
21. King-Sears, M. E., Mercer, C. D., & Sindelar, P. T. (1992). Towards independence with keyword mnemonics: A strategy for science vocabulary instruction. Remedial and Special Education, 13, 22-23.
22. Lawson, M. J., & Hogben, D. (1998). Learning and recall of foreign-language vocabulary: Effects of keyword strategy for immediate and delayed recall. Learning and Instruction, 8, 179-194.
23. Lerner, J. (1997). Learning disabilities: Theories, diagnosis, and teaching strategies. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
24. Levin, J. R. (1988). Elaboration-based learning strategies: Powerful theory = powerful application. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 13, 191-205.
25. Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., & Fulk, B. J. M. (1990). Teaching abstract vocabulary with the keyword method: Effects on recall and comprehension. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 92-96.
26. McCormick, S. (1999). Instructing students who have literacy problems. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
27. Miller, A. D., Barbetta, P. M., & Heron, T. E. (1994). START tutoring: Designing, training, implementing, adapting, and evaluating tutoring programs for school and home settings. In R. Gardner III, D. Sainato, J. O. Cooper, T. E. Heron, W. L. Heward, J. Eshleman, & T. A. Grossi (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instruction (pp. 265-282). Monterey, CA: Brookes-Cole.
28. Moore, D., & Readance, J. (1984). A quantitative and qualitative review of graphic organizer research. Journal of Education Research, 78, 11-17.
29. Mortweet, S. L., Utley, C. A., Walker, D., Dawson, H. L., Delquadri, J. C., Reddy, S. S., Greenwood, C. R., Hamilton, S., & Ledford, D. (1999). Classwide peer tutoring: Teaching students with mild mental retardation in inclusive classrooms. Exceptional Children, 65, 524-536.
30. Ranger, L. (1995). Improving reading comprehension through a multi-faceted approach utilizing drama. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 380 758)
31. Richardson, S. (1995). Specific developmental dyslexia: retrospective and prospective views: The history of learning disabilities. In C. McIntyre & J. Pickering (Eds.), Clinical studies of multisensory structured language education: For students with dyslexia and related disorders (pp. 1-15). Salem, OR: International Multisensory Structured Language Education Council.
32. Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1992). Classroom applications of mnemonic instruction: Acquisition, maintenance, and generalization. Exceptional Children, 58, 219-229.
33. Taba, H. (1967). Teacher's handbook for elementary social studies. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
34. Tam, B. K. Y., & Scott, M. L. (1996). Three group instructional strategies for students with limited English proficiency. Journal for Vocational Special Needs Education, 19, 31-36.
35. Wood, K., & Algozzine, B. (1994). Teaching reading to high-risk learners. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
36. Xin, F., Glaser, C., & Rieth, H. (1996). Multimedia reading: Using anchored instruction and video technology in vocabulary lessons. Teaching Exceptional Children, 29, 46-50.