Adaptive models and electoral instability

Journal of Theoretical Politics

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 393-419

  De Marchi, Scott ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Complexity theory; Computational models; Elections; Voting

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038850188     PISSN: 09516298     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0951692899011003007     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bernhardt, M. Daniel and Daniel E. Ingberman (1985) 'Candidate Reputations and the Incumbency Effect', Journal of Public Economics 27: 47-67.
2. Black, Duncan (1958) The Theory of Committees and Elections. New York: Cambridge University Press (reprinted 1987; Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic).
3. Calvert, Randall (1985) 'Robustness of the Multidimensional Voting Model: Candidate Motivations, Uncertainty, and Convergence', American Journal of Political Science 29: 69-95.
4. Davis, Otto, Morris DeGroot and Melvin Hinich (1972) 'Social Preference Orderings and Majority Rule', Econometrica 40: 147-57.
5. Della Carpini, Michael and Scott Keeter (1991) 'Stability and Change in the U.S. Public's Knowledge of Politics', Public Opinion Quarterly 27: 133-41.
6. Downs, Anthony (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
7. Enelow, James and Melvin Hinich (1983) 'On Plott's Pairwise Symmetry Condition for Majority Rule Equilibrium', Public Choice 40: 317-21.
8. Enelow, James and Melvin Hinich (1984) The Spatial Theory of Voting. New York: Cambridge University Press.
9. Ferejohn, John (1986) 'Incumbent Performance and Electoral Control', Public Choice 50:5-25.
10. Ferejohn, John (1993) 'The Spatial Model and Elections', in B. Grofman (ed.) Information, Participation, and Choice, pp. 107-24. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
11. Fiorina, Morris (1981) Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
12. Hinich, Melvin and Munger, Michael (1994) Ideology and the Theory of Political Choice. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
13. Kollman, Ken, John Miller and Scott Page (1992) 'Adaptive Parties in Spatial Elections', American Political Science Review 86: 929-38.
14. Kollman, Ken, John Miller and Scott Page (1998) 'Political Parties and Electoral Landscapes', British Journal of Political Science 28: 139-58.
15. Kramer, Gerald (1973) 'On a Class of Equilibrium Conditions for Majority Rule', Econometrica 41: 285-97.
16. McKelvey, Richard (1976) 'General Conditions for Global Intransitivities in Formal Voting Models', Econometrica 47: 1085-111.
17. McKelvey, Richard and Peter Ordeshook (1985a) 'Sequential Elections with Limited Information', American Journal of Political Science 29: 480-512.
18. McKelvey, Richard and Peter Ordeshook (1985b) 'Elections with Limited Information: A Fulfilled Expectations Model Using Contemporaneous Data as Information Sources', Journal of Economic Theory 36: 55-85.
19. Page, Benjamin (1977) 'Elections and Social Choice: The State of the Evidence', American Journal of Political Science 21: 639-68.
20. Plott, Charles (1967) 'A Notion of Equilibrium and Its Possibility under Majority Rule', American Economic Review 57: 787-806.
21. Schelling, Thomas (1978) Micromotives and Macrobehavior. New York: W. W. Norton.
22. Schofield, Norman (1984) 'Social Equilibrium and Cycles on Compact Sets', Journal of Economic Theory 33: 59-71.
23. Stokes, Donald (1963) 'Spatial Models of Party Competition', American Political Science Review 57: 368-77.
24. Zaller, John (1992) The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.