Systematic review of 10 years of systematic reviews in prosthodontics

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 123-127

  Creugers, Nico H J ^a   Kreulen, Cees M ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DENTURE; EVALUATION; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SURVIVAL; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; LITERATURE;

DENTAL IMPLANTS, SINGLE-TOOTH; DENTURE, PARTIAL, FIXED; HUMANS; META-ANALYSIS; PROSTHODONTICS; REVIEW LITERATURE; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0038826542     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR). Acute Pain Management: Operative or Medical Procedures and Trauma. AHCPR 92-0038. Rockville, MD: AHCPR, 1992.
2. Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Sinclair JC, Hayward R, Cook DJ, Cook RJ. Users' guides to the medical literature. IX. A method for grading health care recommendations. J Am Med Assoc 1995;274:1800-1804.
3. Clarke M, Oxman AD. Formulating the Problem. Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook 4.1.5 [updated April 2002], Section 4. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2. Oxford, UK: Update Software, 2002.
4. Dumbrigue HB, Jones JS, Esquivel JF. Control of bias in randomized controlled trials published in prosthodontic journals. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:592-596.
5. Sjögren P, Halling A. Quality of reporting randomized clinical trials in dental and medical research. Br Dent J 2002;192:100-103.
6. Jokstad A, Esposito M, Coulthard P, Worthington HV. The reporting of randomized controlled trials in prosthodontics. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:230-242.
7. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 1960;20:37-46.
8. Antczak-Boukoms AA. Epidemiology of research for temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 1995;9:226-234.
9. Cochran DL. A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces. J Periodontol 1999;70:1523-1539.
10. Creugers NHJ, van't Hof MA. An analysis of clinical studies on resin-bonded bridges. J Dent Res 1991;70:146-149.
11. Creugers NHJ, Mentink AG, Käyser AF. An analysis of durability data on post and core restorations. J Dent 1993;21:281-284.
12. Creugers NHJ, Käyser AF, van't Hof MA. A meta-analysis of durability data on conventional fixed bridges. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1994;22:448-452.
13. Creugers NHJ, Kreulen CM, Snoek PA, De Kanter RJAM. A systematic review of single-tooth restorations supported by implants. J Dent 2000;28:209-217.
14. Crider AB, Glaros AG. A meta-analysis of EMG biofeedback treatment of temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 1999;13:29-37.
15. De Kanter RJ, Truin GJ, Burgersdijk RCW, et al. Prevalence in the Dutch adult population and a meta-analysis of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorder. J Dent Res 1993;72:1509-1518.
16. Downer MC, Azli NA, Bedi R, Moles DR, Setchell DJ. How long do routine dental restorations last? A systematic review. Br Dent J 1999;187:432-439.
17. Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomson P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated implants (I). Success criteria and epidemiology. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:527-551.
18. Goodacre CJ, Campagni WV, Aquilino SA. Tooth preparation for complete crowns: An art based on scientific principles. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:363-376.
19. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:45-64.
20. Kreulen CM, Creugers NHJ, Meijering AC. Meta-analysis of anterior veneer restorations in clinical studies. J Dent 1998;26:345-353.
21. Lee JJ, Rouhfar L, Beirne OR. Survival of hydroxyapatite implants: A meta-analytic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;58:1372-1379.
22. Lindh T, Gunne J, Tillberg A, Molin M. A meta-analysis of implants in partial edentulism. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:80-90.
23. Martin N, Jedynakiewicz NM. Clinical performance of CEREC ceramic inlays: A systematic review. Dent Mater 1999;15:54-61.
24. Obrez A, Turp JC. The effect of musculoskeletal facial pain on registration of maxillomandibular relationships and treatment planning: A synthesis of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:439-445.
25. Payne AG, Solomons YF. The prosthodontic maintenance requirements of mandibular mucosa- and implant-supported over-dentures: A review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:238-243.
26. Rosted P. Practical recommendations for the use of acupuncture in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders based on the outcome of published controlled studies. Oral Dis 2001;7:109-115.
27. Santacatterina A, Paoli M, Peretta R, Bambace A, Beltrame A. A comparison between horizontal splint and repositioning splint in the treatment of "disc dislocation with reduction." Literature meta-analysis. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:81-88.
28. Schwartz-Arad D, Chaushu G. The ways and wherefores of immediate placement of implants into fresh extraction sites: A literature review. J Periodontol 1997;68:915-923.
29. Scurria MS, Bader JD, Shugars DA. Meta-analysis of fixed partial denture survival: Prostheses and abutments. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:459-464.
30. Taylor TD. Prosthodontic problems and limitations associated with osseointegration. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:74-78.
31. Tong DC, Rioux K, Drangsholt M, Beirne OR. A review of survival rates for implants placed in grafted maxillary sinuses using meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:175-182.
32. Verzijden CW, Creugers NHJ, van't Hof MA. A meta-analysis of two different trials on posterior resin-bonded bridges. J Dent 1994;22:29-32.
33. Landis JR, Koch GG. An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement. Biometrics 1977;33:363-374.
34. Richards D, Lawrence A. Evidence based dentistry. Br Dent J 1995;179:270-273.
35. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies. A proposal for reporting. J Am Med Assoc 2000;283:2008-2012.
36. Black N. Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care. Br Med J 1996;312:1215-1218.
37. Egger M, Schneider M, Smith GD. Spurious precision? Metaanalysis of observational studies. Br Med J 1998;316:140-144.
38. Brown JP. Is Moose a loose goose? [editorial]. Evidence Based Dent 2000;2:82-84.
39. Phillips B, Ball C, Sacket D, et al. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence [May 2001]. http://minerva.minervation.com/cebmy.
40. Colditz GA, Burdick E, Mosteller F. Heterogeneity in meta-analysis of data from epidemiological studies: A commentary. Am J Epidemiol 1995;142:371-382.
41. Berlin JA. Benefits of heterogeneity in meta-analysis of data from epidemiological studies. Am J Epidemiol 1995;142:383-387.
42. Song F, Sheldon TA, Sutton AJ, Abrams KR, Jones DR. Methods for exploring heterogeneity in meta-analysis. Eval Health Prof 2001;24:126-151.
43. Thompson SG. Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated. Br Med J 1994;309:1351-1355.
44. Antczak AA, Tang J, Chalmers TC. Quality assessment of randomized control trials in dental research (II). Results: Periodontal research. J Periodontal Res 1986;21:315-321.