Conceptual framework for document semantic modelling: An application to document and knowledge management in the legal domain

Data and Knowledge Engineering

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 345-375

  Jouve, David ^a,b   Amghar, Youssef ^a   Chabbat, Bertrand ^b   Pinon, Jean Marie ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b Ctr Natl d'Etud Developpements I   (France)

Author keywords

Document semantic modeling; Graphical knowledge representation; Legal document

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; PORTALS; SEMANTICS;

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION;

EID: 0038824829     PISSN: 0169023X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-023X(03)00046-6     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. von Wright G.H. Norm and Action: A Logical Enquiry, International Library of Philosophy and Scientific Method. 1963;Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
2. Royakkers L. Combining deontic and action logics for collective agency. Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, JURIX 2000: The Thriteenth Annual Conference. 2000;135-146 IOS Press, Amsterdam.
3. McCarty L. A language for legal discours I. Basic structures. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. 1989;180-189 ACM, Vancouver, Canada.
4. R.W. van Kralingen, Frame-Based Conceptual Models of Statute Law, Computer/Law series 16, Kluwer Law International, The Hague, 1995.
5. A. Valente, Legal knowledge engineering, a modelling approach, Ph.D. thesis, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1995.
6. T.J.M. Bench-Capon, Arguing with cases, in: Legal Knowledge Based Systems JURIX 97: The Tenth Conference, The Vrije Universiteit, 1997, pp. 85-99.
7. Pietrosanti E., Graziadio B. Advanced techniques for legal documents processing and retrieval. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 7(4):1999;341-361.
8. Winkels R., Bosscher D., Boer A., Hoekstra R. Extended conceptual retrieval. Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, JURIX 2000: The Thriteenth Annual Conference. 2000;85-97 IOS Press, Amsterdam.
9. Moens M.-F. Innovative techniques for legal text retrieval. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 9:2001;29-57.
10. Merkel D., Schweighofer E., Winiwarter W. Exploratory analysis of concept and document spaces with connectionist networks. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 7(2-3):1999;185-209.
11. Jouve D., Chabbat B., Amghar Y., Pinon J.-M. L'archivage des documents réglementaires: mâtrise d'une matière première spécifique. Document Numérique. 4(3-4):2001;315-329.
12. Hart H. The Concept of Law, Clarendon Law Series. 1961;Oxford University Press, Oxford.
13. Ross A. Directives and Norms, Clarendon Law Series. 1968;Humanities Press, New York.
14. Kelsen H. Pure Theory of Law. 1978;University of California Press, Berkley, USA. Translation of "Reine Rechtslehre" (second revised edition, 1960) by Max Knight, First published in 1934.
15. von Wright G. Practical Reason, Philosophical Papers. 1983;Blackwell, Oxford.
16. Kelsen H. General Theory of Norms. 1991;Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK. Translation of "Allgemeine Theorie der Normen" by Hartney.
17. R. van Kralingen, E. Reurings, E. Oskamp, Norm frames in the representation of laws, in: Legal Knowledge Based Systems JURIX 93: Intelligent Tools for Drafting Legislations, Computer-Supported Comparison of Law, Knoinklijke Vermande, Lelystad, 1993, pp. 11-22.
18. D. Jouve, B. Chabbat, Y. Amghar, J.-M. Pinon, Structuration sémantique de la réglementation, in: Proceedings of the XIXème Congrès INFormatique des ORganisations et Systèmes d'Information et de Décision (INFORSID'2001), INFORDSID Editions, Martigny, Suisse, 2001, pp. 5-26.
19. Davis R., Shrobe H., Szolovits P. What is a knowledge representation? AI Magazine. 14(1):1993;17-33.
20. Rand A. Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology. 1979;New American Library, New York, USA.
21. R.K. Stamper, The role of semantics in legal expert systems and legal reasoning, Ratio Juris 4.
22. Stamper R.K. Signs, information, norms and systems. Holmqvist B., Andersen P.B. Signs of Work: Semiotics and Information Processing in Organisations. 1996;349-397 De Bruyter, Berlin, Germany.
23. T.R. Gruber, A translation approach to portable ontology specifications, Knowledge Acquisition 5.
24. Visser P.R.S., Bench-Capon T.J.M. A comparison of four ontologies for the design of legal systems. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 6(1):1998;27-57.
25. P.R.S. Visser, Knowledge Specification for Multiple Legal Tasks; A Case Study of the Interaction Problem in the Legal Domain, Computer/Law serie 17, Kluwer Law International, The Hague, The Netherlands, 1995.
26. R.W. van Kralingen, A Conceptual Frame-based Ontologie for the Law, in: R.G.F. Winkels, P.R.S. Visser, (Eds.), Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Legal Ontologies (LEGONT'97), Melbourne, Australia, 1997, pp. 15-22.
27. Kralingen R.W.V., Visser P.R.S., Bench-Capon T.J.M., Herik H.J.V.D. A principled approach to developing legal knowledge systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 51:1999;1127-1154.
28. B. Chabbat, Modélisation multiparadigme de textes réglementaires, Ph.D. thesis, Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon, Lyon, France, Décembre 1997.
29. Jouve D., Chabbat B., Amghar Y., Pinon J.-M. Modélisation sémantique de la réglementation. Ingénierie des Systèmes d'Information. 6(2):2001;95-119.
30. Sergot M. The representation of law in computer programs: a survey and comparison of past and current projects. Bench-Capon T. Knowledge Based Systems and Legal Applications. 1990;3-67 Academic Press.
31. Valente A., Breuker J., Brouwer B. Legal modeling and automated reasoning with on-line. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 51:1999;1079-1125.
32. Breuker J. Toward a workbench for legal practitioner. van Noortwijk C., Schmidt A., Winkels R.G.F. Legal Knowledge Based Systems: Aims for Research and Development. 1990;25-36 Knoinklijke Vermande.
33. J. Breuker, N. den Haan, Separating world and regulation knowledge: Where is the logic? in: M. Sergot (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on AI and Law, 1991, pp. 41-51.
34. Sowa J.F. Conceptual Structures Information Processing in Mind and Machine, The System Programming Series. 1984;Addison-Wesley.
35. Roberts D.D. The Existential Graphs of Charles S. Peirce. 1973;Mouton, The Hague.
36. Sowa J.F. Knowledge Representation: Logical, Philosophical, and Computational Foundations. 2000;Brooks Cole Publishing Co. Pacific Grove, USA.
37. Mugnier M.-L., Chein M. Représenter des connaissances et raisonner avec des graphes. Revue d'intelligence artificielle. 10(1):1996;7-56.
38. Chein M., Mugnier M.-L. Conceptual graphs: fundamental notions. Revue d'intelligence artificielle. 6(4):1992;365-406.
39. Leclère M. C-CHic: Construction coopérative de hiérarchies de catégories. Revue d'intelligence artificielle. 10(1):1996;57-100.
40. M.L. Mugnier, Knowledge representation and reasonings based on graph homomorphism, in: B. Ganter, G. Mineau (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures (ICCS'00), vol. 1867 of Lecture Notes in AI, Springer, Darmstadt, Germany, 2000, pp. 172-192.
41. Bos C., Botella B., Vanheeghe P. Modeling and simulating human behaviors with conceptual graphs. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Conceptual Structures (ICCS'97). vol. 1257:1997;275-289 Springer Verlag.
42. Wulf W.A., Shaw M., Hilfinger P.N., Flon L. Fundamental Structures of Computer Science. 1981;Addison-Welsey.
43. Mugnier M.-L. On generalization/specialization for conceptual graphs. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence. 7:1995;325-344.
44. Chein M., Mugnier M.L., Simonet G. Nested graphs: a graph-based knowledge representation model with FOL semantics. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR'98). 1998;524-534 Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Trento, Italie.
45. P.W. Brouwer, Samenhang in recht: een analytishe studie, Rechtswetenschappelijke Reeks, Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen, The Netherlands, 1990.
46. P. Bailhache, Authorities and addressees in deontic logic: indexed operators and action, in: J.-J.C. Meyer, R.J. Wieringa (Eds.), Proceedings of the First International Worshop on Deontic Logic in Computer Science, Amsterdam, 1991, pp. 72-88.
47. L. Royakkers, F. Dignum, The idea of obligation or: How to interpret O(p)? in: Legal Knowledge Based Systems, JURIX 95: Telecommunication and AI and Law, Knoinklijke Vermande, Lelystad, 1995, pp. 105-112.
48. Ryu Y.U. Conditional deontic logic augmented with defeasible reasoning. Data and Knowledge Engineering. 16:1995;73-91.
49. Ryu Y.U., Lee R.M. Defeasible deontic reasoning and its applications to normative systems. Decision Support Systems. 14:1995;59-73.
50. International Organization for Standardization, Standard Generalized Markup Language, International Standard ISO 8879:1986(E), 1986.
51. World Wide Web Consortium, Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Second Edition), W3C Recommendation. Available from < http://www.w3.org/tr/rec-xml > 2000.
52. Southey F., Linders J.G. Notio - a Java API for developing CG tools. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Conceptual Structures (ICCS'99). Tepfenhart W., Cyre W. Lecture Notes in AI. 1999;262-271 Springer, Berlin.
53. J.F. Sowa, Conceptual graphs: draft proposed American National Standard, in: W. Tepfenhart, W. Cyre (Eds.), Conceptual Structures: Current Research and Practice, Lecture Notes in AI # 1640, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1999, pp. 1-65, an updated version is available at http://www.jfsowa.com/cg/cgstand.htm.