In-plane magnetodrag between dilute two-dimensional systems

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 90, Issue 22, 2003, Pages 2268011-2268014

  Pillarisetty, R ^a   Noh, Hwayong ^a   Tutuc, E ^a   De Poortere, E P ^a   Tsui, D C ^a   Shayegan, M ^a  

^a Princeton University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MAGNETIC FIELDS; MAGNETORESISTANCE; POLARIZATION; SCATTERING;

IN-PLANE MAGNETODRAG;

MOLECULAR DYNAMICS;

EID: 0038792193     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. S. V. Kravchenko et al., Phys. Rev. B 50, 8039 (1994).
2. E. Abrahams et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 673 (1979).
3. For a recent review, see B. L. Altshuler et al., Physica (Amsterdam) 9E, 209 (2001); E. Abrahams et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 251 (2001).
4. For a recent review, see B. L. Altshuler et al., Physica (Amsterdam) 9E, 209 (2001); E. Abrahams et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 251 (2001).
5. D. Simonian et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2304 (1997).
6. J. Yoon et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4421 (2000).
7. Y. Y. Proskuryakov et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4895 (2001); X. P. A. Gao et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 016801 (2002).
8. Y. Y. Proskuryakov et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4895 (2001); X. P. A. Gao et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 016801 (2002).
9. H. Noh et al., cond-mat/0206519.
10. T. J. Gramila et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1216 (1991).
11. See, for a review, A. G. Rojo, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 11, R31 (1999).
12. R. Pillarisetty et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 016805 (2002).
13. J. P. Eisenstein et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 57, 2324 (1990).
14. Single layer transport data is presented for only the top layer. However, all properties of this layer differed by less than 10% from those in the bottom layer.
15. E. Tutuc et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2858 (2001).
16. We point out that in-plane transport in Si metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor systems exhibit a saturation of the resistivity for B > B*. There still exists much controversy as to why the GaAs and Si systems show different behavior at high field.
17. -2 had a slight bit of leakage error. However, the ground swaps differed only by roughly 15%.
18. Y. Meir, Phys. Rev. B 61, 16 470 (2000).
19. V. T. Dolgopolov and A. Gold, JETP Lett. 71, 27 (2000).
20. X. G. Feng et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 368 (1999).
21. J. S. Meyer et al., cond-mat/0206024.
22. S. Das Sarma and E. H. Hwang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5596 (2000).
23. A. Jauho and H. Smith, Phys. Rev. B 47, 4420 (1993).
24. T. J. Gramila et al., Phys. Rev. B 47, 12957 (1993); H. Noh et al., Phys. Rev. B 59, 13114 (1999).
25. T. J. Gramila et al., Phys. Rev. B 47, 12957 (1993); H. Noh et al., Phys. Rev. B 59, 13114 (1999).
26. M. Kellogg et al., Solid State Commun. 123, 515 (2002).